Let me emphasize that a bit differently:
No. If you play the scene to completion and allow her to talk then you find out she wasn't cheating, although the choice to believe her or not is up to you.
So yeah, he more or less said she wasn't cheating. He did not say anything like "she explains to you" or similar but plain old "she wasn't cheating".
I get that, I feel like I explained the same thing 5 times already. My point was that the dev acknowledges he let it up to the player to draw their own conclusion IN THE GAME, because you know a cheater would hardly admit outright they were planning to cheat, and the whole situation is very suspicious: getting together with your old fuckbuddy for a trip without making things clear for him from the start, not telling your bf, the fact that they have talked before to plan the trip, yet he still talks to her as if they were going to fuck, and she is letting it happen because she wants to explain in person????
Come one thats fucking suspicious, thats why the dev admits it is up to the player.
Sure, from the dev's comment it seems like she didn't cheat (or planning to cheat) after all, he basically confirms it. But you only know this
if you read his comment here, someone that just played the game wouldn't know that, because that information is NOT IN THE GAME.
And the argument we were having initially is that it was somehow "retarded" to think she was cheating with the information that was in the game, so I showed it wasn't, as the dev himself admits it is up to the player to decide. Thats why I focus on the possibility of it, as you said, because that was the whole point.
I never claimed she was cheating "100% no doubt", thats why I put the cheating in quotation marks, I dont know how many times I have to repeat this but here it is a third a time.
I am guessing this confusion stems from not knowing that in
fallen roads the "cheating" isn't confirmed either or is basically expected that it somehow didnt happen, despite all the evidence pointing that way, it was just a way for the dev to add a little drama at the start of the game hence the similarity:
Second, I put cheating in "" because in both games, the cheating itself is not confirmed, but its still what they were going for, the drama that it entails is still part of the backstory in this case.
About Simone being a LI I already said that I dont think it will happen, if you think the odds are in favor then ok. Again, I never said it wouldn't happen, I said
claiming she is a LI right now wouldn't be correct. The whole LI talk came because the other guy was using it as "proof" of why she couldn't have cheated because she was a LI and dev said no ntr, so it was ridiculous of anyone to believe she cheated.
And, I was saying that you cant use that as proof because its not been confirmed, and, imo, the game doesnt really suggest she is a LI as she is, well... gone, nowhere to be seen or heard of since she left. He mentioned something about love points being in the game data but come on, that is not indisputable evidence of anything.