"and for every one who liked being thirsted over by Jean after repeatedly turning her down and her quirks, there was someone else complaining about it being forced down your throat which is going to be exponentialized with more characters"
		
		
	 
Jean's thirstiness isn't tied to a quirk. She's just like that even with no quirks. But sure, it's worse with quirks. I do agree and am thankful for the approach they have done with quirks so it doesn't seem default. Well, it does for Laura a bit but social restraint isn't really something she's learned well yet so it makes sense. And Rogue gives it to you like a kink talk about what you're comfortable with. Jean is a bit more subtle and weaves the sibling thing into dialogue.
	
		
	
	
		
		
			Looks like they will add non-relationship quirk events for platonic playthroughs in the future but I'm thinking more about why section off already existing content that previously worked just fine in platonic playthroughs.
		
		
	 
I mentioned it, but considering that quirks are labels that give alternate dialogue that is all shared under the quirk label, it is strange for a platonic Rogue to be pulling a "punish me harder daddy".
We can say that Jean or Laura being dominant is an expression of them needing control over their lives, the sibling thing is non kinky, or that Rogue's submissiveness is preferring others deal with the burden of deciding things or Laura's protectiveness could work platonically. But even with those, remember that all of the dialogue is shared with their sexual counterparts.
So Ron would need to have it where new Jean dominant dialogue never has a sexual tone outside of sex scenes.
Anyway, I can see why they are hesitant, but yeah I'd like something going on so it doesn't feel like you're getting less.