- Dec 17, 2017
- 940
- 584
Sorry for late replying.
This was mostly sarcastic & jokingly meant and a bit as a slap on the wrist because i know he tends to ignore no-cheat warnings of some people or even defends it. More clear: I wanted to imply oCATo didn understand because he did'n want or did not care.
I can understand why this came somewhat wrong across. Should have made this more clear.

Yes. It's very much known to me.
This should be checksum based i think. Otherwise it would need some amount of coding work to check every change. And too much perhaps. So thats a simple "one for all" message.
I see....the problem was your tone. The saying " I am not surprised at all" may not make people comfortable. And you put an underline at "you", which I am not sure how oCATo would understand the underline "you"...
This was mostly sarcastic & jokingly meant and a bit as a slap on the wrist because i know he tends to ignore no-cheat warnings of some people or even defends it. More clear: I wanted to imply oCATo didn understand because he did'n want or did not care.
I can understand why this came somewhat wrong across. Should have made this more clear.
My whole problem is not the help you give with cheating and advice for it. No. Never. I cheat or edit games also sometimes. I find it just important to state"very" clearly if the users do it, they should know what they do or stay away from it! That's all.NLT not say, "do not". NTL say, "we not help".
And here, this is my Job.
For some months i see: Here, noone want help the gamers, not love grinding. Many doused these poor people with scolding, laughing and insulting them. And helped them not !
And i had pity with then and start to help....
*Cough*... Here is UnRen from Sam the programm, the most use.
Yes. It's very much known to me.
Indeed.The IC patch will give you the same message even if you did not edit your save. You won't get that message if you only change some inventory items and money.
This should be checksum based i think. Otherwise it would need some amount of coding work to check every change. And too much perhaps. So thats a simple "one for all" message.