Someone

Active Member
Jun 3, 2017
928
1,090
The art looks like AI art? I am not sure, but if it is AI art then I won't want to play
Resistance is futile, it will become more efficient and widespread.
And is a good thing for small indy developers like usually are those who make hentai games. AI assistance will become the norm for every "traditional" (if using a graphic tablet and SAI can be considered traditional) artist cause it actually speed up the process a lot. And this technology is still embryo. The potential is massive.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Frank1415

alibaba34

Member
Mar 11, 2018
160
224
I like AI art. I want to figure out how to make my own, in order to coom to that. After decades of experience in porn consumption, I'm sure I can come up with some degenerate stuff that can get me hard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cairen56

SupaHot

New Member
Oct 6, 2017
12
24
I do not care about the use of generative neural networks vs. manual work beyond what the end result looks like. That being said, to me this game just seems like a poor use of the technology. The whole point should be that you cut down on the amount of manual work required and can thus create something better with the same amount of effort. For example, you could automatically generate the unimportant parts of an image, then draw the important parts yourself. Or you could relatively easily create multiple variations of the same scene using img2img. But to me it seems that for this game the intent was just to produce something that is "good enough" with low effort.

For context: I would have hoped that with the comparatively lower effort needed to create the images the game would have a pregnancy system and pregnant CG variations. But instead it seems that there is only a single scene with pregnancy.
 

Kuljackero

Newbie
Apr 22, 2020
55
124
In the end, AI is a tool. Most people are trying to use it and some suck at it. But i'll gladly praise anyone who uses AI that is used good on translations (dazedanon) or AI art (never seen one good yet, This is like, at least passable)

Again, As long as the results are good for porn games, Then why the fuck not am i right? This isnt some triple A games where you can shit on devs because you paid $60. This is a pirate forum site ffs.
 

Spiculuz

Newbie
Sep 22, 2018
35
26
i dont have any problems with ai being used for translations and stuff but i just cant get down with ai art, i cant explain it but whenever i see ai cgs i just dont feel anything. cant fap to it
 

Zappky

Member
Jul 19, 2017
245
349
AI art is definitely a controversial topic nowadays. Especially in this small thread, whether you voice your approval or not disapproval of the advancement in AI, it will be akin to a squeak in a market full of chaos.

There is only one thing I hope to convey: and that is for anyone who read this, please do feel and think, be honest with yourself, what does AI art actually means for us, and our future?

I have two main points to present:
1. Lost of current talent, and stiffening of future talent.
2. Promoting growth of generic products.

With the ease of creating AI art, at a pleasing level of quality, using just a few prompts, do anyone of you here still any burning desire to learn art from scratch? What about the kids growing up? If you are learning art now, do you have the motivation to continue your path?
The effect of AI art is clearly discouraging the budding young talents and the shakening the veteran artists.

If you are thinking at this point, this is not a problem, right? AI can replace these outdated skillset eventually. AI will be perfect for creating art that is indistinguishable from human-drawn art.

You are right, and I do agree that AI will eventually become so advanced that it will eventually be close to perfect. Almost indistinguishable.
However, you are forgetting that AI, as a machine, doesn't have imagination. Machines runs on maths, relying on raw datas. It will never produce anything innovative. It will give you the most optimal result. The most calculated, precise piece of product. But, in the domain of creative work, which are art and game, this is just an imitation of human's imagination.

Without a healthy amount of passionate new artist, we will see a decline in new artstyle, decline in the continuation of some artstyle, hindering the development of new artstyle and art theory. All of these decline will also affect the data for the AI art . AI art will become stagnant without the emerging artist. We art we see around us, such as Pixvix, will be stagnant.

These leads to my second point.
As the ease of making game becoming even more advance. Game can be almost entirely made using AI, such as generative text, to generate ideas, and scenarios. Generative art to make CG, standing character art, background...
Game that has this kind of skewered ration of human input to machine input, the end result will be a generic game.
Why innovate? why think of a new exciting story and scenario? A new fetish?
This is the problem with generating a creative product. The desire to grow, to create, to innovate, will be cheapened.
The convenience of Ai, will likely create an increasing amount of generic game. Game that has very similar artstyle, very similar mistake, very similar story and scenario.
The data after all, came from us, the human. If we as human don't continue to be creative and innovate, stagnation and decline will happen.

To wrap this up, do think about what does AI means to you. Personally, I think AI is wonderful in reducing laborious work, and that is to be supported. However, when it comes to the creative domain, it will bring more harm in the long run than the immediate benefits. AI art, is like a pandora box, it is already opened. It is a power that cannot be stop. But where and how we as public wants to use is entirely within out hands.

To finally end this discussion, I want to say that whether you enjoy or do not enjoy ai art, it is your own enjoyment, you own choice. There is no right or wrong to it.

I personally, do not enjoy a game that is largely produced with calculation, and not with passion or creativity. It is no fun to me.
 

♍VoidTraveler

Forum Fanatic
Apr 14, 2021
5,392
13,859
AI art is definitely a controversial topic nowadays. Especially in this small thread, whether you voice your approval or not disapproval of the advancement in AI, it will be akin to a squeak in a market full of chaos.

There is only one thing I hope to convey: and that is for anyone who read this, please do feel and think, be honest with yourself, what does AI art actually means for us, and our future?

I have two main points to present:
1. Lost of current talent, and stiffening of future talent.
2. Promoting growth of generic products.

With the ease of creating AI art, at a pleasing level of quality, using just a few prompts, do anyone of you here still any burning desire to learn art from scratch? What about the kids growing up? If you are learning art now, do you have the motivation to continue your path?
The effect of AI art is clearly discouraging the budding young talents and the shakening the veteran artists.

If you are thinking at this point, this is not a problem, right? AI can replace these outdated skillset eventually. AI will be perfect for creating art that is indistinguishable from human-drawn art.

You are right, and I do agree that AI will eventually become so advanced that it will eventually be close to perfect. Almost indistinguishable.
However, you are forgetting that AI, as a machine, doesn't have imagination. Machines runs on maths, relying on raw datas. It will never produce anything innovative. It will give you the most optimal result. The most calculated, precise piece of product. But, in the domain of creative work, which are art and game, this is just an imitation of human's imagination.

Without a healthy amount of passionate new artist, we will see a decline in new artstyle, decline in the continuation of some artstyle, hindering the development of new artstyle and art theory. All of these decline will also affect the data for the AI art . AI art will become stagnant without the emerging artist. We art we see around us, such as Pixvix, will be stagnant.

These leads to my second point.
As the ease of making game becoming even more advance. Game can be almost entirely made using AI, such as generative text, to generate ideas, and scenarios. Generative art to make CG, standing character art, background...
Game that has this kind of skewered ration of human input to machine input, the end result will be a generic game.
Why innovate? why think of a new exciting story and scenario? A new fetish?
This is the problem with generating a creative product. The desire to grow, to create, to innovate, will be cheapened.
The convenience of Ai, will likely create an increasing amount of generic game. Game that has very similar artstyle, very similar mistake, very similar story and scenario.
The data after all, came from us, the human. If we as human don't continue to be creative and innovate, stagnation and decline will happen.

To wrap this up, do think about what does AI means to you. Personally, I think AI is wonderful in reducing laborious work, and that is to be supported. However, when it comes to the creative domain, it will bring more harm in the long run than the immediate benefits. AI art, is like a pandora box, it is already opened. It is a power that cannot be stop. But where and how we as public wants to use is entirely within out hands.

To finally end this discussion, I want to say that whether you enjoy or do not enjoy ai art, it is your own enjoyment, you own choice. There is no right or wrong to it.

I personally, do not enjoy a game that is largely produced with calculation, and not with passion or creativity. It is no fun to me.
Don't say.png :coffee:
 

Plusice

New Member
Mar 4, 2023
6
40
Even though its AI art its not that bad maybe the artist draw rough sketch then using AI to complete it, The translation is MTL edited still readable, the game is like alissa havenots cavern maybe because to reach place is by selecting it not by exploring...
correct me if i'm wrong though
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vandiana

ZenEvadoni77

Member
Aug 24, 2020
133
264
I can read nothing but the title and just know that there's going to be NTR.

See the word "wife" anywhere? NTR. It takes black magic to create a game with a married woman as a chief character and to not have NTR in the game.
 
3.20 star(s) 6 Votes