Unity Venus's Club [v9.5.0.1] [Disgruntler]

[Tobe]

And maybe add the cowgirl position on the same occasion ?

Unfortunately, it is not at all the same kind of work... Adding a new performance isn't exactly something the game was made for. I'm still trying to find a way to do it without having to redesign and rebalance half of the game.

One mechanic that I would like to see, is an option tu assign random girls to clients during the working time.
As it is, it is quite tedious to manage 6 girls simultaneously. If you assing random girls to random clients, independantly of their openness, you can enjoy a more "hand free" experience of the girls working. It would be a fine addition to have when you are done upping the openness of your girls and just want to enjoy random clips of porn.

It has been asked a few times now. I'm not a fan of it because it destroys the gameplay aspect of the game... It could maybe be added as a very late game improvement.

 

[dusty stu]

Unfortunately, it is not at all the same kind of work... Adding a new performance isn't exactly something the game was made for. I'm still trying to find a way to do it without having to redesign and rebalance half of the game.



It has been asked a few times now. I'm not a fan of it because it destroys the gameplay aspect of the game... It could maybe be added as a very late game improvement.

Give the people what they want. (Make it an option in the settings menu. )

 

[Loganfin]

Before I started making Girlpacks, I noted that various others included Cowgirl in the missionary folder. Honestly, if a girl is going to do one, its not a stretch to say that she'll do the other. And in some cases, it can be hard to find a lot of scenes of one of them for certain girls, so combining them into one works out well.

 

[taler]

How about a mac build and android build?

 

[Tobe]

Before I started making Girlpacks, I noted that various others included Cowgirl in the missionary folder. Honestly, if a girl is going to do one, its not a stretch to say that she'll do the other. And in some cases, it can be hard to find a lot of scenes of one of them for certain girls, so combining them into one works out well.

That's one solution I've considered. I'll need to rename a few things but it is doable.

How about a mac build and android build?

Mac build is something I want to do but MacOS doesn't seem to agree with my attempts. I'll keep on trying though.
I'm not working on and do not intend to work on an Android port though.

Give the people what they want. (Make it an option in the settings menu. )

I doubt this would take the form of an option. I like more and more the idea of adding an improvement for that though.

 

[SlightlyTitillated]

A lot of the girls from girlpacks have all stats at 100. Is that intended?

 

[Loganfin]

A lot of the girls from girlpacks have all stats at 100. Is that intended?

Its up to the person who makes the pack. I go in and edit them so that they aren't. I think its more fun to build them up.

 

[Kevinyip93]

got a problem, I can't see the picture of the girls, but the video seems to work, how can I fix that?

 

[Tobe]

got a problem, I can't see the picture of the girls, but the video seems to work, how can I fix that?

Make sure that the path to the game folder does not contain a special character (like # or %).

 

[Vicissitudo]

Just asking, since sometimes you said it can be done others it could be hard to implement: would be hard to add categories?
Once you said you wanted to add Cowgirl, if I recall correctly. Could it be done with others like, for example: Double Penetration and Bukkake?
Old packs could be easily updated (and eventually implemented).

Thanks!

 

[Tobe]

Just asking, since sometimes you said it can be done others it could be hard to implement: would be hard to add categories?
Once you said you wanted to add Cowgirl, if I recall correctly. Could it be done with others like, for example: Double Penetration and Bukkake?
Old packs could be easily updated (and eventually implemented).

Thanks!

I assume by "category" you mean a group of three performances (like "oral", "dancing", stuff like that). I'd have to think about it but I believe it wouldn't be easy to add. Game mechanics wise it would change the pace and logic and the game. Technically, the game was made for 6 categories so adding one would be a rework of a lot of code. As for the girlpacks, this would be a lot of work for the packmakers (as for what I understand, there are more than 500 packs at this point...).

Adding just another performance (like cowgirl in the "sex" category) would be a lot of technical work too, plus an imbalance between categories(as it would mean that one of them would have 4 performances and the other only 3).

The exception here is for finishers. Adding one shouldn't be a big issue (in fact, I already partially added one in the next update) and wouldn't change the game mechanics much. The only problem left is for packmakers, as it would be a lot of work for them (again, more than 500 packs). Plus, I don't know if I should make this finisher available by default (meaning that for the moment, all the packs would use the default clips for it) or not.

All in all, modifying the packs in any way is a bit of a pain and a lot of work for me and the packmakers. Just changing names though (like renaming the "Missionary" performance to something that would include different positions) is an easier solution as it would give the packmakers the possibility to redo their packs if they want without being an issue if they don't. Plus some packs already include different positions in the "Missionary" performance.

That is what I'm thinking right now, and that is why I'm hesitant to do it. When I said adding a Cowgirl performance would be doable, I didn't give it enough thought and didn't realize how complex (both technically and for the game mechanics) it would be.

tl;dr Technically, the game is made for 6 categories and 3 performances per category, there are a ton of girlpacks, and changing that would require a lot of work, from me and packmakers.

 

[Vicissitudo]

I assume by "category" you mean a group of three performances (like "oral", "dancing", stuff like that). I'd have to think about it but I believe it wouldn't be easy to add. Game mechanics wise it would change the pace and logic and the game. Technically, the game was made for 6 categories so adding one would be a rework of a lot of code. As for the girlpacks, this would be a lot of work for the packmakers (as for what I understand, there are more than 500 packs at this point...).

Adding just another performance (like cowgirl in the "sex" category) would be a lot of technical work too, plus an imbalance between categories(as it would mean that one of them would have 4 performances and the other only 3).

The exception here is for finishers. Adding one shouldn't be a big issue (in fact, I already partially added one in the next update) and wouldn't change the game mechanics much. The only problem left is for packmakers, as it would be a lot of work for them (again, more than 500 packs). Plus, I don't know if I should make this finisher available by default (meaning that for the moment, all the packs would use the default clips for it) or not.

All in all, modifying the packs in any way is a bit of a pain and a lot of work for me and the packmakers. Just changing names though (like renaming the "Missionary" performance to something that would include different positions) is an easier solution as it would give the packmakers the possibility to redo their packs if they want without being an issue if they don't. Plus some packs already include different positions in the "Missionary" performance.

That is what I'm thinking right now, and that is why I'm hesitant to do it. When I said adding a Cowgirl performance would be doable, I didn't give it enough thought and didn't realize how complex (both technically and for the game mechanics) it would be.

tl;dr Technically, the game is made for 6 categories and 3 performances per category, there are a ton of girlpacks, and changing that would require a lot of work, from me and packmakers.

Understood. Thanks a lot for taking so much time to explain that to me, I appreciate!

Actually I haven't explained myself well. I didn't mean one of the "main" categories but just adding a finisher or a position.

There is something that bugs me a bit but I understand is 100% personal taste, so it's only my point of view.
As "swallow" finisher isn't really that useful for some reasons. Mostly because "real" swallow scenes are extremely rare and then because these mostly take really long in therms of seconds. So aren't actually easy to be put in that 30 seconds window if the game (I know the full clip can be played if zoomed).
Then because it lacks of "multi cumshot/bukkake" wich is much more common but would be a bit out of place to be unlocked while "oral" is playing and "sex" still has to be unlocked.

I don't know if you get what I mean but that's why I asked if it was possible to add a category and to add this one unlockable with same amount of Openess of Orgy.

But again, that's just MY personal preference/thought.

 

[Tobe]

Understood. Thanks a lot for taking so much time to explain that to me, I appreciate!

Actually I haven't explained myself well. I didn't mean one of the "main" categories but just adding a finisher or a position.

There is something that bugs me a bit but I understand is 100% personal taste, so it's only my point of view.
As "swallow" finisher isn't really that useful for some reasons. Mostly because "real" swallow scenes are extremely rare and then because these mostly take really long in therms of seconds. So aren't actually easy to be put in that 30 seconds window if the game (I know the full clip can be played if zoomed).
Then because it lacks of "multi cumshot/bukkake" wich is much more common but would be a bit out of place to be unlocked while "oral" is playing and "sex" still has to be unlocked.

I don't know if you get what I mean but that's why I asked if it was possible to add a category and to add this one unlockable with same amount of Openess of Orgy.

But again, that's just MY personal preference/thought.

The "multi-cumshot" finisher is the one I'm currently working on adding. It will indeed require the same amout of openness as threesome/foursome/orgy.

 

[pronzcowboy]

Having a really weird issue with the game. The audio turns off as soon as I load a game or start a new game, at least the music, then there's no music accompanying the performers and the audio for the performances can't be muted once it's been enabled. I deleted my entire app data folder created new save same issues.

 

[Kevinyip93]

Make sure that the path to the game folder does not contain a special character (like # or %).

Oh, my bad, problem solved, thanks!

 

[Tobe]

This is mostly a question for packmakers but I'm interested in anyone's opinion.
As I said before, I'm thinking about renaming the "Missionary" and "Doggystyle" performances to something that would include more positions. That would allow to have more diversity in sex positions without having to add more performances.
I'm currently thinking of renaming those into "Vaginal" and "Vaginal from behind". I'm not a big fan of the second one, but it feels like it does the job.
I'm here to ask what do you think of those, and maybe give me what you would consider a better name, that I might use in the game.

As a note, the folders in the girlpacks will also change names, BUT I will make sure that old names will still work, so you don't have to remake already existing packs (in other words, both "Missionary" and "Vaginal" will work for the name of the folder containing those performances, with priority given to "Vaginal" if the folder exists).

 

[High_Imperceptor]

I'm currently thinking of renaming those into "Vaginal" and "Vaginal from behind". I'm not a big fan of the second one, but it feels like it does the job.
I'm here to ask what do you think of those, and maybe give me what you would consider a better name, that I might use in the game.

How about "Vaginal Passive" and "Vaginal Active"? First can cover missionary, prone-bone, etc., and second covers doggy, cowgirl, and so on.

 

[gaston2020]

I'm currently thinking of renaming those into "Vaginal" and "Vaginal from behind". I'm not a big fan of the second one, but it feels like it does the job.
I'm here to ask what do you think of those, and maybe give me what you would consider a better name, that I might use in the game.

I think it will just add confusion to the packmakers, which will lead to wrong scenes in categories. Just like the "closer" category (look at some packs, you will notice that most packmakers supply closeups on boobs or ass instead of body-to-body scenes).

Please just leave doggy and missionary as they are, it's straightforward to understand.

I am no dev (but I work in IT, so development is not that foreign to me), but I don"t really see what the big issue is if the sex category has 4 subcategories (if cowgirl is added) instead of 3 for the others: if the sex category is selected in the booth, the game will randomly select a scene within the 4 subfolders (is that so hard to change ?) instead of 3. The other thing to change would be to add the cowgirl feature that we would have to buy to access it in the booth, but I guess it wouldn't be that hard to change in the code.

And for the fact that packmakers would have to add a line in the json file and a new cowgirl folder, it's up to them to take care of it, or anyone else willing to do so on their own computer or share with other players. That's why the game community is made for.

Am I wrong thinking that way ?

 

[nujol23]

This is mostly a question for packmakers but I'm interested in anyone's opinion.
As I said before, I'm thinking about renaming the "Missionary" and "Doggystyle" performances to something that would include more positions. That would allow to have more diversity in sex positions without having to add more performances.
I'm currently thinking of renaming those into "Vaginal" and "Vaginal from behind". I'm not a big fan of the second one, but it feels like it does the job.
I'm here to ask what do you think of those, and maybe give me what you would consider a better name, that I might use in the game.

As a note, the folders in the girlpacks will also change names, BUT I will make sure that old names will still work, so you don't have to remake already existing packs (in other words, both "Missionary" and "Vaginal" will work for the name of the folder containing those performances, with priority given to "Vaginal" if the folder exists).

That's essential how I did my packs with missionary being any face to face position (so missionary or cowgirl) and doggy being non face to face (doggy or reverse cowgirl). So the change wouldn't really make any differences to my packs but I do also see how it could cause some confusion for future pack makers.

 

[CruddySculpin]

I'm currently thinking of renaming those into "Vaginal" and "Vaginal from behind". I'm not a big fan of the second one, but it feels like it does the job.

Maybe have the forward vaginal descriptive as well "Vaginal from front"", "Vaginal front entry", "Forward vaginal"? Having it make sense for new pack makers is key, current pack makers can easily adjust to whatever it's changed to.

As a note, the folders in the girlpacks will also change names, BUT I will make sure that old names will still work, so you don't have to remake already existing packs (in other words, both "Missionary" and "Vaginal" will work for the name of the folder containing those performances, with priority given to "Vaginal" if the folder exists).

Awesome!!!! Please do, that would be fabulous!

As a side note, having extra position categories would be a great add for game progression (new policies to get etc), however, I am also fine with the category rename idea if you choose to go that route. Thanks for all your efforts thus far Tobe!! Me likey very much!! Cheers