- Dec 8, 2020
- 779
- 935
hmm, i'd argue since they were in a dating/childhood sweetheart type relationship with MC it most certainly counts as NTR. regardless of vaginal sex itself being there or not, mainly due to the presence of a romantic intent on MC's part and the 'reciprocation' on the twins' part.My last 2 cents on this. How long they've known each other has absolutely no merit or factor. You could have known your wife since kindergarten but not become sexually active until late teens (which still isn't really a factor imho), so any of her previous affairs are negated. I won't debate the issue beyond this post as I'm keenly aware folks have different opinions but I will say that anytime in life that someone is cheated on or betrayed does not necessarily equal NTR. They just aren't the same thing. Coercion of the cheater against their will via the instigator and that cheater continuing and accepting it is the main ingredient that changes a scenario into technical NTR (as a brief summary). I personally fail to see that case in this particular situation. But again, it's simply my point of view which doesn't mean a damn thing at the end of the day, and I acknowledge that. So, joke's on me for even writing this paragraph.
but hey we're arguing definitions here so it's mostly moot thing to do. keep up the good work man! i use and abuse your mod!
back to the topic, i'm also of the faction that don't care if they were virgins or not. the lies and actions matter to me. and as of the previous update (1.6) i found them to be irredeemable sociopaths and a bit poorly written for this kind of twist. i hope 1.6.1 changes things enough for me... but i remain skeptical. especially if they're still making mass graves... though i might consider giving them a second chance if they are already having doubts when they meet MC again. (ie: thought they were doing shit 'for the greater good' but questioning the method)