VN Ren'Py Where the Heart Is [S1 Rev1] [CheekyGimp]

[Geralt_R]

I don't understand your reasoning so much....

All I am trying to say is... yes, there is a LOT of choice. You can be faithful, you can be nice, you can be a greedy bastard and I appreciate it all very much! The number of choices in the game is exemplary! Almost nothing is forced on the player. I mean, what other game gives you options for minor things like "dirty talk" or "no dirty talk" here and there? You can even affect how other characters speak (Katie).

BUT: the game (in my opinion only of course) still heavily encourages you to go after as many women as possible, and if you don't... you are penalized with a lack of content. It's not a major nitpick, it's just an observation and it's nothing that really annoys me, it's just a pet peeve.
I just generally feel most VNs would greatly benefit from fewer LIs and fewer random encounters and instead more fleshed out main LIs with more scenes. I feel you are encouraged to be the sleazeball and liar and that can make you feel uneasy eventually, which is of course also a sign of good writing, you feel uneasy because of the writing (since the game more or less has the characters behave in believable ways when they find out certain things, they are upset, hurt, devastated etc). But again, it's nothing super major, just an observation. I felt like the worst person in the world when Jo found out about the spyware and how the scene then unfolded. Again, it's more praise really than anything else of course.

The movie night scene when you try to romance all three of the women in the house is also utter insanity in a very fun way, if you like juggling chainsaws... but also highlights the fact what a complete ass the MC has become (or you, the player). And if you really manage to focus on just 1-3 characters... you miss out on so much. That is maybe only something for the 2nd playthrough. Who wants to play a game only to never see 70+% of the content? People play these games to see as much content as possible?

If you do it here... it can make you feel uneasy because the game is more realistic than the usual power fantasies. Which is absolutely not a bad thing, the opposite. But maybe a game (any game) shouldn't encourage the Pokemon approach then and make it a lot more satisfying to just go after 1-3 LIs? Instead you meet Mabel and Porsche (both very attractive, probably more attractive than most main characters), you have characters like Wanda and Angel which do nothing really for the main story (they are lots of fun of course, but not essential), you have the super thirsty neighbor, the religious nutjob Theresa etc. and because of the number of characters in the game there are long stretches where you will never interact with any of your favorite characters. If you also ignore Monica (to focus on the sisters) you get even less content. Who wants that from a pure gameplay perspective? So you will engage with them all in the end. Or most at least. Which in turn makes the MC an asshole. I ditched Monica before movie night (I reloaded), it was too much for me

If the writing was worse, if it was the stereotypical power fantasy with paper thin characters none of that would be of any concern, but since the characters are much better written than in many other games it does matter, I think.

About the points... you never know how many points you need for anything, you are absolutely encouraged to give the "best" reply with the most points, as in any other game with a points system. There is a tracker for the points for a reason. Especially early in the game on any path I would assume most people are concerned with maxing out points so you don't accidentally lock out a character or a scene, it doesn't matter as much later in the game when certain relationship statuses have been locked in. It's never revealed in the game how many points you need for anything or ff the points even matter at all.

 

[NakedSingularity]

so what are the chances of an incest patch?

already an incest/WT mod that rewrites the story/dialog to make incest work (mom isn't dead, just living in other house you move to with MC's 2 sisters). Too bad it's usually an episode behind the latest release (ep21 for now, won't work for ep22).

 

[Vannhh]

All I am trying to say is... yes, there is a LOT of choice. You can be faithful, you can be nice, you can be a greedy bastard and I appreciate it all very much! The number of choices in the game is exemplary! Almost nothing is forced on the player. I mean, what other game gives you options for minor things like "dirty talk" or "no dirty talk" here and there? You can even affect how other characters speak (Katie).

BUT: the game (in my opinion only of course) still heavily encourages you to go after as many women as possible, and if you don't... you are penalized with a lack of content. It's not a major nitpick, it's just an observation and it's nothing that really annoys me, it's just a pet peeve.

You mean like in real life? Where if you make it a numbers game you will get to go on more dates and experiences instead of just shooting your shot twice and maybe get nothing? And if you string lots of women along you will get shit eventually? Gasp!

I understand your complaint about the content, but honestly it's a bit of a moot point. More options means more replayability. I like that we have all these options. I like that the devs throw in subtle little changes along the way as well. It shows how dedicated they are to the game. I can't imagine keeping track of everything this far into the story.
Instead of banging everyone, having to actually choose carefully makes the interactions with the characters MUCH more impactful too, it puts them a peg above the characters of other games.

I honestly can't really think of anything I would like them to change. They have a pretty great formula and structure going on as it is.

 

[Geralt_R]

Instead of banging everyone, having to actually choose carefully makes the interactions with the characters MUCH more impactful too, it puts them a peg above the characters of other games.

This is certainly true. Almost all characters are much better written than in most other games I have played. As I mentioned before, that scene with Jo when she finds out about the software on her laptop and Jenna's snooping was pretty impactful.
Yet the game still eggs you on to go after all of them (for example via MC's inner monologue), maybe out of mischief so you see how things can blow up. Movie night was funny... but things can become nuclear very easily and then you feel like the complete idiot you are, because yes, the game does give you more than enough hints. The dialogue choices when Katie and Monica are both in your room (Monica in the bathroom) after movie night are hilarious, when the MC hopes this may be one of the situations with typical VN porn logic and a threesome is one of the dialogue options.

That being said, the game is generally very nice to players, you are provided with various exit points to break up and still keep things friendly, so once you realize that building a harem may be the worst idea ever, you can begin to focus on the characters you care about the most. I wonder how many do that or how many players still try to pursue almost everyone.

 

[acewinz]

This is certainly true. Almost all characters are much better written than in most other games I have played. As I mentioned before, that scene with Jo when she finds out about the software on her laptop and Jenna's snooping was pretty impactful.
Yet the game still eggs you on to go after all of them (for example via MC's inner monologue), maybe out of mischief so you see how things can blow up. Movie night was funny... but things can become nuclear very easily and then you feel like the complete idiot you are, because yes, the game does give you more than enough hints. The dialogue choices when Katie and Monica are both in your room (Monica in the bathroom) after movie night are hilarious, when the MC hopes this may be one of the situations with typical VN porn logic and a threesome is one of the dialogue options.

That being said, the game is generally very nice to players, you are provided with various exit points to break up and still keep things friendly, so once you realize that building a harem may be the worst idea ever, you can begin to focus on the characters you care about the most. I wonder how many do that or how many players still try to pursue almost everyone.

Hehe... To try and put your mind at ease. We and the MC are definitely not "trying" to get you into trouble, but that doesn't always mean what the MC thinks is a good idea, actually is. Definitely use your own judgement. But as far as egging you on to go after everyone... We did actually encourage that for the majority of the game for several reasons. The number 1 being it is the easiest way to see all the content and it was easy to dodge getting caught. Even so a lot of players had separate playthroughs because they saw what can happen if you get caught. We also have been sending a lot of signals now about starting to sort your relationships, or be ready for risk.

We also have provided a nice quickstart option for people who need it (or just want to see other content they avoided), as we are getting near the end... The player has to make some choices on who he really wants to end up with, or try and add multiples to his polyamory basket and hope it doesn't sour some of the other delicious girls inside. There are multi girl endings, but not all girls are down with that, and some may not be compatible together, some require a lot of work to convince, etc. Most of all, you can break some hearts, and even trying to make it work requires a bit of moral elasticity. lol

As for penalizing you for not going after everyone... well that is a bit of a glass half empty way of saying you want more content with the girls you prefer, but I'm afraid as I said before, we aren't a dating sim. We are telling a story, and some girls have more involvement in that than others. But I like to think when you consider that girls who were never more than side arcs/girls can still be endgame LI's (and have the content at present to allow that to be belieavable), well I think we gave a lot overall. Not many games have our amount of content or episodes, and none have our depth of choice, but I might be biased.

 

[snakeplisskin]

Hehe... To try and put your mind at ease. We and the MC are definitely not "trying" to get you into trouble, but that doesn't always mean what the MC thinks is a good idea, actually is. Definitely use your own judgement. But as far as egging you on to go after everyone... We did actually encourage that for the majority of the game for several reasons. The number 1 being it is the easiest way to see all the content and it was easy to dodge getting caught. Even so a lot of players had separate playthroughs because they saw what can happen if you get caught. We also have been sending a lot of signals now about starting to sort your relationships, or be ready for risk.

We also have provided a nice quickstart option for people who need it (or just want to see other content they avoided), as we are getting near the end... The player has to make some choices on who he really wants to end up with, or try and add multiples to his polyamory basket and hope it doesn't sour some of the other delicious girls inside. There are multi girl endings, but not all girls are down with that, and some may not be compatible together, some require a lot of work to convince, etc. Most of all, you can break some hearts, and even trying to make it work requires a bit of moral elasticity. lol

As for penalizing you for not going after everyone... well that is a bit of a glass half empty way of saying you want more content with the girls you prefer, but I'm afraid as I said before, we aren't a dating sim. We are telling a story, and some girls have more involvement in that than others. But I like to think when you consider that girls who were never more than side arcs/girls can still be endgame LI's (and have the content at present to allow that to be belieavable), well I think we gave a lot overall. Not many games have our amount of content or episodes, and none have our depth of choice, but I might be biased.

Which i greatly appriecate i only play as a manwhore at the beginning of games because i have no idea who anyone is yet. So i pursue eveyone to figure out who my solo routes will be once we get to know everyone.

 

[Vannhh]

As for penalizing you for not going after everyone... well that is a bit of a glass half empty way of saying you want more content with the girls you prefer, but I'm afraid as I said before, we aren't a dating sim. We are telling a story, and some girls have more involvement in that than others. But I like to think when you consider that girls who were never more than side arcs/girls can still be endgame LI's (and have the content at present to allow that to be belieavable), well I think we gave a lot overall. Not many games have our amount of content or episodes, and none have our depth of choice, but I might be biased.

Not biased at all. I'm all caught up with WTHI and trying some other titles now. The quality difference is staggering, from character design and writing to the amount of choices and even the writing quality of the story itself.

WTHI might not be a dating simulator, but by gawd do you guys do a better job with it than most of the full fledged DS I have played. Especially because you actually include side characters as LIs which caters to a majority of tastes.

Can't wait to see what you guys have up your sleeves next, for chapters as well as new titles when this story unfortunately reaches it's end.

 

[Geralt_R]

Not many games have our amount of content or episodes, and none have our depth of choice, but I might be biased.

This is not biased in my opinion. WTHI is exemplary when it comes to character depth and depth of choices. Nothing, literally nothing, is ever forced on the player. You can even screw all characters over and go for the money if you are a heartless psychopath like the dad

And though I moaned about the lack of content if you are on a true solo path, I do of course still very much appreciate the general approach, it's certainly a daunting task if you wanted to replay WTHI from scratch to explore other paths, that game is LONG. So giving players the option to pursue everyone up to a certain point is certainly the best choice from a pure gameplay perspective. And then you get hints that you may have to show some restraint. It's up to the player to pick up on those (very obvious) hints. I still laugh at seeing Monica barge in with her nurse costume while Katie is grinding on the MC. All the chainsaw juggling eventually resulted in a few lost limbs after all And still, it's easily remedied... And the episode quickstart is a real boon if you want to check out other paths before you return to your main savegame.

 

[felicemastronzo]

All I am trying to say is... yes, there is a LOT of choice. You can be faithful, you can be nice, you can be a greedy bastard and I appreciate it all very much! The number of choices in the game is exemplary! Almost nothing is forced on the player. I mean, what other game gives you options for minor things like "dirty talk" or "no dirty talk" here and there? You can even affect how other characters speak (Katie).

BUT: the game (in my opinion only of course) still heavily encourages you to go after as many women as possible, and if you don't... you are penalized with a lack of content. It's not a major nitpick, it's just an observation and it's nothing that really annoys me, it's just a pet peeve.
I just generally feel most VNs would greatly benefit from fewer LIs and fewer random encounters and instead more fleshed out main LIs with more scenes. I feel you are encouraged to be the sleazeball and liar and that can make you feel uneasy eventually, which is of course also a sign of good writing, you feel uneasy because of the writing (since the game more or less has the characters behave in believable ways when they find out certain things, they are upset, hurt, devastated etc). But again, it's nothing super major, just an observation. I felt like the worst person in the world when Jo found out about the spyware and how the scene then unfolded. Again, it's more praise really than anything else of course.

The movie night scene when you try to romance all three of the women in the house is also utter insanity in a very fun way, if you like juggling chainsaws... but also highlights the fact what a complete ass the MC has become (or you, the player). And if you really manage to focus on just 1-3 characters... you miss out on so much. That is maybe only something for the 2nd playthrough. Who wants to play a game only to never see 70+% of the content? People play these games to see as much content as possible?

If you do it here... it can make you feel uneasy because the game is more realistic than the usual power fantasies. Which is absolutely not a bad thing, the opposite. But maybe a game (any game) shouldn't encourage the Pokemon approach then and make it a lot more satisfying to just go after 1-3 LIs? Instead you meet Mabel and Porsche (both very attractive, probably more attractive than most main characters), you have characters like Wanda and Angel which do nothing really for the main story (they are lots of fun of course, but not essential), you have the super thirsty neighbor, the religious nutjob Theresa etc. and because of the number of characters in the game there are long stretches where you will never interact with any of your favorite characters. If you also ignore Monica (to focus on the sisters) you get even less content. Who wants that from a pure gameplay perspective? So you will engage with them all in the end. Or most at least. Which in turn makes the MC an asshole. I ditched Monica before movie night (I reloaded), it was too much for me

If the writing was worse, if it was the stereotypical power fantasy with paper thin characters none of that would be of any concern, but since the characters are much better written than in many other games it does matter, I think.

About the points... you never know how many points you need for anything, you are absolutely encouraged to give the "best" reply with the most points, as in any other game with a points system. There is a tracker for the points for a reason. Especially early in the game on any path I would assume most people are concerned with maxing out points so you don't accidentally lock out a character or a scene, it doesn't matter as much later in the game when certain relationship statuses have been locked in. It's never revealed in the game how many points you need for anything or ff the points even matter at all.

I understand better now.

and in some respects I agree with you. so many LIs, they mean either micro content for each one at each chapter or a minimum of turn-around at least for the more minor ones. and I say all this as a fan of Lily, my only waifu in the game.

however, finding the right balance is really tricky, even with a few LIs, the importance of content for each of them in each chapter is unlikely to be fair, there will always be cycles that overwhelmingly take over and others that get crushed. moreover, almost every time I've played an AVN with one LI clearly being the main one over the others, I've had that feeling of arranged marriage that annoyed me anyway.

a game like WTHI gives you the illusion of choice, if you really want to cultivate the dream of living with lots of money and two models by your side (Wanda + Angel) you can do that, sure you will have many half-empty chapters, but I don't see it as a big deal between mechanism to decide where to start and the fact that you can skip what you have already seen.

other point on which you are basically right is that the game pushes you to feel out the field with more girls, this is clearly in the interest of the writer of the story, as we know at the end that there will be several showdowns, and it is true that to date MC has managed to get away with the most impossible situations, which gives us a false sense of security, but I still chickened out already at the first opportunity, when Monica bursts into the room with Wanda hiding under the desk...

one point I less agree with you on is the anxiety about the perfect score, it's nonsense, if there was no report at the end of the chapter having a guide would become too important, but we know you don't need perfect scores, but in case even we find ourselves in the case of "your score doesn't allow you to..." peace, restarting from that chapter with all the requirements ok. WTHI is a game that is experienced without great anxiety, that is its beauty

 

[CallumTheMan]

anyone got the dev update from 2 days ago?

 

[ename144]

Hehe... To try and put your mind at ease. We and the MC are definitely not "trying" to get you into trouble, but that doesn't always mean what the MC thinks is a good idea, actually is. Definitely use your own judgement. But as far as egging you on to go after everyone... We did actually encourage that for the majority of the game for several reasons. The number 1 being it is the easiest way to see all the content and it was easy to dodge getting caught. Even so a lot of players had separate playthroughs because they saw what can happen if you get caught. We also have been sending a lot of signals now about starting to sort your relationships, or be ready for risk.

I don't think the game encourages us to cheat on everyone with everyone, at least not directly. The MC's internal dialog aside, the game is pretty even handed about the many opportunities we face: we know we can try it, but it's also made clear there are reasons trying it might end badly. It's definitely up to us how much trouble we're willing to court.

That said, I do think the game tends to assume we have been sleeping around. There's rarely alternate dialog (much less an alternate scene) to handle situations where a would-be trap is entirely harmless. For example, even if the MC never had anything to do with Katie, Lily or Debbie - even if he left in the middle of the beach house sleepover - he'll still **Gulp** (and monologue about needing OJ's defense team) when Katie asks to talk with him the next morning.

In the grand scheme this sort of thing isn't really a big deal, but when it happens consistently it does contribute to the sense that a solo run is playing the game 'wrong.' It's rare that the game acknowledges an MC who has been entirely above board; avoiding the big orgy by declaring love for Debbie or Lily alone is the only major occurrence I can think of so far. Otherwise, things tend to play out as if the MC has something to hide regardless of what his actual situation is. Even seemingly loyal actions, like declaring his commitment to Katie in Episode 20, are undermined by the way the MC will behave exactly the same when he intends to talk Debbie and Lily into continuing their respective affairs in private. Sure, our choices can technically prove our words true, but how important is that when the game will still react as though we had our fingers crossed?

I'd love it if the game had more chances for the MC to commit proactively to his chosen path. Imagine how different the game would feel if an MC who was only dating Lily called her to set up the date in Episode 22 rather than the scene everyone else gets where she reminds him of his promise. Even if the rest of the conversation and subsequent date played out the same either way, it would instantly make the solo path feel distinct and meaningful.

Now the reality is that would require a whole bunch of additional code to handle extra branches; it's arguably a poor use of resources given how few players are likely to play solo routes. So I'm willing to pick my battles. As long as the game will ultimately let us play a loyal solo path through our actions, I can live with the fact that the MC will adopt the sketchiest possible portrayal of loyalty he can find.

But if the devs happen to encounter a low cost opportunity to highlight when an MC has taken a path less traveled, I hope they'll seize it.

We also have provided a nice quickstart option for people who need it (or just want to see other content they avoided), as we are getting near the end... The player has to make some choices on who he really wants to end up with, or try and add multiples to his polyamory basket and hope it doesn't sour some of the other delicious girls inside. There are multi girl endings, but not all girls are down with that, and some may not be compatible together, some require a lot of work to convince, etc. Most of all, you can break some hearts, and even trying to make it work requires a bit of moral elasticity. lol

All praise the quick start system!

That said, I have noticed one awkward thing about it: when the game asks us additional questions after setting the basic quick start parameters, those questions are specific to the episode being started. There's no sense of continuity. For example, Episode 22 asks us if we did anything with Mabel at the carnival in Episode 18, because Mabel appears in Episode 22. But if you started Episode 21 instead, the game won't ask because the information wasn't relevant then. This means that if you continue that quick start into Episode 22, you'll never get to choose what happened with Mabel because the game never asks you.

Instead of coding each episode with specific list of questions, it would be nice if each question was flagged with the episode in which it first becomes relevant. That way the game could run through a single list of all the questions and ask the ones that matter. From the above example, the question about Mabel would be asked when starting any episode after 18. For bonus points you could also list an episode where the question stops being relevant (so that if, say, Mabel was dropped from the game after Episode 22, you wouldn't need to ask about her in subsequent episodes).

Then again, I have no idea how much programming time that would take. Maybe it's not worth worrying about when we're closing in on the end?

As for penalizing you for not going after everyone... well that is a bit of a glass half empty way of saying you want more content with the girls you prefer, but I'm afraid as I said before, we aren't a dating sim. We are telling a story, and some girls have more involvement in that than others. But I like to think when you consider that girls who were never more than side arcs/girls can still be endgame LI's (and have the content at present to allow that to be belieavable), well I think we gave a lot overall. Not many games have our amount of content or episodes, and none have our depth of choice, but I might be biased.

I think you do a good job handling the vast amount of choices in the game. The cast is too large to add alternative content for every rejected opportunity. Even if you somehow did, people who also skipped the alternative would be right back in same boat. Less eventful episodes is an unavoidable consequence of rejecting opportunities. The question is how to make the choice feel relevant despite the lowered runtime. As I said above, I think the best way to compensate is to add a few small tweaks to normal dialog/art that acknowledges the difference when such alternatives are feasible.

 

[NotNeeded!]

Did eek! games copy a character; Click the link and scroll and look at the bottom left character.

You must be registered to see the links

 

[acewinz]

I don't think the game encourages us to cheat on everyone with everyone, at least not directly. The MC's internal dialog aside, the game is pretty even handed about the many opportunities we face: we know we can try it, but it's also made clear there are reasons trying it might end badly. It's definitely up to us how much trouble we're willing to court.

That said, I do think the game tends to assume we have been sleeping around. There's rarely alternate dialog (much less an alternate scene) to handle situations where a would-be trap is entirely harmless. For example, even if the MC never had anything to do with Katie, Lily or Debbie - even if he left in the middle of the beach house sleepover - he'll still **Gulp** (and monologue about needing OJ's defense team) when Katie asks to talk with him the next morning.

In the grand scheme this sort of thing isn't really a big deal, but when it happens consistently it does contribute to the sense that a solo run is playing the game 'wrong.' It's rare that the game acknowledges an MC who has been entirely above board; avoiding the big orgy by declaring love for Debbie or Lily alone is the only major occurrence I can think of so far. Otherwise, things tend to play out as if the MC has something to hide regardless of what his actual situation is. Even seemingly loyal actions, like declaring his commitment to Katie in Episode 20, are undermined by the way the MC will behave exactly the same when he intends to talk Debbie and Lily into continuing their respective affairs in private. Sure, our choices can technically prove our words true, but how important is that when the game will still react as though we had our fingers crossed?

I'd love it if the game had more chances for the MC to commit proactively to his chosen path. Imagine how different the game would feel if an MC who was only dating Lily called her to set up the date in Episode 22 rather than the scene everyone else gets where she reminds him of his promise. Even if the rest of the conversation and subsequent date played out the same either way, it would instantly make the solo path feel distinct and meaningful.

Now the reality is that would require a whole bunch of additional code to handle extra branches; it's arguably a poor use of resources given how few players are likely to play solo routes. So I'm willing to pick my battles. As long as the game will ultimately let us play a loyal solo path through our actions, I can live with the fact that the MC will adopt the sketchiest possible portrayal of loyalty he can find.

But if the devs happen to encounter a low cost opportunity to highlight when an MC has taken a path less traveled, I hope they'll seize it.


All praise the quick start system!

That said, I have noticed one awkward thing about it: when the game asks us additional questions after setting the basic quick start parameters, those questions are specific to the episode being started. There's no sense of continuity. For example, Episode 22 asks us if we did anything with Mabel at the carnival in Episode 18, because Mabel appears in Episode 22. But if you started Episode 21 instead, the game won't ask because the information wasn't relevant then. This means that if you continue that quick start into Episode 22, you'll never get to choose what happened with Mabel because the game never asks you.

Instead of coding each episode with specific list of questions, it would be nice if each question was flagged with the episode in which it first becomes relevant. That way the game could run through a single list of all the questions and ask the ones that matter. From the above example, the question about Mabel would be asked when starting any episode after 18. For bonus points you could also list an episode where the question stops being relevant (so that if, say, Mabel was dropped from the game after Episode 22, you wouldn't need to ask about her in subsequent episodes).

Then again, I have no idea how much programming time that would take. Maybe it's not worth worrying about when we're closing in on the end?


I think you do a good job handling the vast amount of choices in the game. The cast is too large to add alternative content for every rejected opportunity. Even if you somehow did, people who also skipped the alternative would be right back in same boat. Less eventful episodes is an unavoidable consequence of rejecting opportunities. The question is how to make the choice feel relevant despite the lowered runtime. As I said above, I think the best way to compensate is to add a few small tweaks to normal dialog/art that acknowledges the difference when such alternatives are feasible.

Spoiler: minor game spoils

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[acewinz]

Did eek! games copy a character; Click the link and scroll and look at the bottom left character.

You must be registered to see the links

Probably not, a lot of Daz models have some default settings that can look alike unless you tweak them. IIRC Intertwined also used Katie's base model for one char. Just something you get used to with Daz. Just like you can find Jolina's base in other games, and especially the "Mom/Landlady" from Dreams of Desire (she is everywhere!) Haha, and Perv's Tales from the Unending Void had their Purple Futa Alien (a side villian, not the one that joins you) come out looking like Elaine (at least above the waist), and as far as I am aware it was just a fluke.

We try to do a lot to make our models unique, but there is only so many assets and variations you can combine if your putting them together like a Mr. Potato Head.

Thankfully we have Cell now and he is one of the best character creators out there IMHO.

 

[Deleted member 1961891]

"Reused" Daz characters have never bothered me much. I've always found it fun to try and remember which models I've seen in other games and then pretend it's like an actor in a movie.

Though I will say that games that try to go the extra mile in creating more uniquely shaped characters are really appreciated. Inceton's games are nice but the models end up feeling very repetive, almost like they're cannabalizing their own designs. (And don't even get me started on honey select games.) Vns like this one, power vacuum, and sexbot are off-the-top-of-my-head examples of creating more unique facial and body designs from daz models. With more and more games doing so increasingly.

Like I said, overall it doesn't bother me, but the extra work is noticed, appreciated, and I think, adds something unique to the overall feel of the game.

 

[Night Hacker]

"Reused" Daz characters have never bothered me much. I've always found it fun to try and remember which models I've seen in other games and then pretend it's like an actor in a movie.

Though I will say that games that try to go the extra mile in creating more uniquely shaped characters are really appreciated. Inceton's games are nice but the models end up feeling very repetive, almost like they're cannabalizing their own designs. (And don't even get me started on honey select games.) Vns like this one, power vacuum, and sexbot are off-the-top-of-my-head examples of creating more unique facial and body designs from daz models. With more and more games doing so increasingly.

Like I said, overall it doesn't bother me, but the extra work is noticed, appreciated, and I think, adds something unique to the overall feel of the game.

Same here. To me, it's like having movie stars who play different roles in different movies. I always thought it could be fun to have a credits section that had "Starring MODEL_ASSET_NAME as CHARACTER_NAME" or whatever...

 

[snakeplisskin]

Probably not, a lot of Daz models have some default settings that can look alike unless you tweak them. IIRC Intertwined also used Katie's base model for one char. Just something you get used to with Daz. Just like you can find Jolina's base in other games, and especially the "Mom/Landlady" from Dreams of Desire (she is everywhere!) Haha, and Perv's Tales from the Unending Void had their Purple Futa Alien (a side villian, not the one that joins you) come out looking like Elaine (at least above the waist), and as far as I am aware it was just a fluke.

We try to do a lot to make our models unique, but there is only so many assets and variations you can combine if your putting them together like a Mr. Potato Head.

Thankfully we have Cell now and he is one of the best character creators out there IMHO.

No wonder i wanted that evil side character to do whatever she wanted with me.

 

[Geralt_R]

"Reused" Daz characters have never bothered me much. I've always found it fun to try and remember which models I've seen in other games and then pretend it's like an actor in a movie.

I feel exactly the same. If I like one character model a lot, say the digital equivalent of seeing someone like Scarlett Johansson in the Avengers or in Ghost in the Shell etc, I am happy when I see her in a different game. People are ok with actors appearing in various movies. VNs aren't that much different? So why do people always call for 100% unique characters? Unique characters are certainly also very welcome of course. Things shouldn't get too samey where you only have a small roster of ever returning DAZ models.

I also don't mind reused set pieces like that one park, the supermarket etc. One can always pretend all these DAZ models live in the same town.

While we talk about the models... is there a list that tells you what character models are used in the games? Like some kind of VN IMDB That could be fun. But I guess the scope of that list and the amount of work required would be stupendous.

 

[acewinz]

Scarlett Johansson

ScarJo you say huh? We sorta have a thing for her too...

 

[HornyyPussy]

ScarJo you say huh? We sorta have a thing for her too...

Well, you have a pulse so...........