In this instance it has the correct world scale, and can even let you configure it. Everything in regular wildlife is around 25% too big when viewed in VR. UEVR, the christmas VR demo, and the old UE4 versions from around 2019 all have the correct scale as well, but at some point the they broke it after moving to UE5, and it would appear noone with any ability to fix that has even noticed.
Unreal Engine Wild Life [2024.12.13 Full Build 1] [Adeptus Steve]
- Thread starter Pepé Le Pew
- Start date
RIGHT?!?! That's what i'm saying I think i know who you are from our interactions on the paypig lounge we had (You know the discord for us eccentrics the ones that pay $110 a month) there is so much going on here that the ill informed amatuers and their toxic opinions would have you think here.
Steve and the team are probably top 5 developer teams in the world, possibly even the BEST. INFACT I would state and bet on my wife's son's life that IF steve was the head of CONCORD it would have never failed and been an avengers franchise equvalent in the video game sphere. Instead he has given his talents to porn the naysayers here should be grateful and become eccentrics to understood properly wildlife teams expertise.
- Nov 24, 2020
- 46
- 19
Did you ever fix the textures in the VR mode on UE5? It always seems to load a super low-res fallback for me, it's keeping me on UE4 for now.
- Nov 4, 2023
- 7
- 1
- Feb 21, 2020
- 25
- 52
Could a moderator please remove messages from this guy for blatant trolling? They're bloating the thread.
- Aug 1, 2017
- 156
- 56
One thing you might try is to lower your VR resolution / density.
This seems to be a workaround with UE versions 5.4 and lower.
I have found that the textures loading in are synonymous with a higher frame rate. But is just from my setup / experience.
- Jan 30, 2018
- 15
- 17
Dude's talking about low-res textures, which is usually indicative of GPU VRAM exceeding the requested limit.
This may be of use to you as a temporary solution:
https://f95zone.to/threads/wild-life-patreon-2024-08-22-adeptus-steve.3810/post-14517872
- Aug 1, 2017
- 156
- 56
Actually it’s an issue with VR and UE 5~5.4. In this case, WildLife does not have specific development for VR, but is allowed via UE’s engine.
With a little optimization, we would have proper texture streaming, as well as, a functional UI in VR.
But, as a workaround, and per users VRAM / setup, reducing pixel density allows for them to be loaded in or ‘streamed’ without bottlenecking
- Aug 1, 2017
- 156
- 56
Wherever you have the WildLife folder, either the root folder or drive it is on, does not have read/write permissions enabled
- Sep 24, 2017
- 90
- 82
Hello friends
anyone knows what should i do for this?
I can't find Lt Palmer
where is he\she??
anyone knows what should i do for this?
I can't find Lt Palmer
where is he\she??
- Aug 1, 2017
- 156
- 56
- Jan 30, 2018
- 15
- 17
Your statement about Pixel Density is nonsense. It determines render resolution based on pixel density on a scale, where a value of 1 equals 100%. That said, it is useful to change that value for performance reasons as it can have a large impact on it. It does, however, in no way affect texture resolution, LOD or image sharpness. If you want texture streaming to stay at an unimpeded constant, under circumstances where it is being impeded by fallback measures from UE 5 itself, the startup parameter
-notexturestreaming or a GPU replacement with one that has more VRAM are the only 2 working solutions for any such cases atm.The example you give above is simply a potential result that might occur, where lowering density would free enough VRAM to fall below the treshold again - in which case textures immediately start streaming in again.
As for bottlenecking; that is by design, Wild Life not being optimized for now and the foreseeable future. So if you don't have an extremely odd hardware setup, your CPU is always going to be the bottleneck.
- Aug 1, 2017
- 156
- 56
I understand the implementation of:
You must be registered to see the links
However, and as you have said, the optimization for WildLife (and other games) in Virtual Reality for UE 5.xx, is actually slightly different an issue than one based off of a GPU/RAM issue; it is an engine issue itself from my experience. LOD does play a role, and that is per user setup, it’s why density level in VR can reduce strain on the bandwidth between the VR/HMD set and the PC.
To call my solution Nonsense is to say you have my same setup.
- Jan 30, 2018
- 15
- 17
UEVR is no doubt not up to date in version 5.3+ and neither is the WL plugin but that's deviating from the issue OP was experiencing, so i don't understand why you brought that up in the first place.
LOD is controlled by other cvars and afaik there is no fallback that infers VR pixel density. There's nothing on record for that anywhere and i've not experienced that in any game while using a VIVE or Rift at any time.
If you are having issues with distance scaling, appending this in engine.ini
r.StaticMeshLODDistanceScale= (Values between 0.1 and 1) where 0.1 draws at the farthest distance, might help.For bandwidth issues, the launch parameter
-nohmd might help. Other than that there isn't much you can do. It's debatable whether it's an engine issue itself or a WL game issue. You may ask the devs. if they're willing to disclose some information regarding that. After all it also depends on whether they used the correct cvars for their project.
- Aug 1, 2017
- 156
- 56