lol they are just dumb whiners, the games they like also has lazy devs who barely make updates on timeWith which better looking Games at which performance targets you comparing it exactly ?
I'm not sure about "performance targets," but if I can run a game on high-to-max settings and have it run good, that's all I need.With which better looking Games at which performance targets you comparing it exactly ?
Ok i rather compare it currently with Final Fantasy XV not the MMO optimization of Luminous in Final Final Fantasy XIV , i can though understand what you mean but as you said artistic style optimzation.I'm not sure about "performance targets," but if I can run a game on high-to-max settings and have it run good, that's all I need.
As for the games in particular, it might be "unfair" to compare Wild Life to stuff that's "professionally" developed, but off the top of my head, games like Final Fantasy XIV, Tekken 7, and Guilty Gear -Strive- are all miles ahead graphically and I can run them looking great and playing smoothly (minus one area in FFXIV... under a certain lighting condition that thankfully got removed permanently as part of the storyline.) Hell, in Killer Instinct there's characters whose projectiles shit out a million particle effects on impact and my comp won't even worry about it. Granted, some of these games also have stylistic choices that makes me consider them to be "better-looking" (FFXIV and Guilty Gear, particularly) but at the same time a good aesthetic also matters.
If you want a less "professional" example, I'd say... Breeders of the Nephelym, as "meh" as that game is, looks vaguely better and runs better than this. Has its own issues of course, like the reused face model on all the women, but in terms of graphics and aesthetics I prefer it over this game, and most importantly I can run it on Ultra settings without issue. (Also the controls don't make me want to rip my limbs off, which is a plus)
But that game looks like world of warcraft... I guess at that point we are talking about personal taste because I really dont like the graphics of botn and prefer wild life much much more.If you want a less "professional" example, I'd say... Breeders of the Nephelym, as "meh" as that game is, looks vaguely better and runs better than this. Has its own issues of course, like the reused face model on all the women, but in terms of graphics and aesthetics I prefer it over this game, and most importantly I can run it on Ultra settings without issue. (Also the controls don't make me want to rip my limbs off, which is a plus)
Breeders of Nephelym has no content bruhIf you want a less "professional" example, I'd say... Breeders of the Nephelym, as "meh" as that game is, looks vaguely better and runs better than this. Has its own issues of course, like the reused face model on all the women, but in terms of graphics and aesthetics I prefer it over this game, and most importantly I can run it on Ultra settings without issue. (Also the controls don't make me want to rip my limbs off, which is a plus)
This is why you don't support the game on patreon .. instead, if you like it and think it is going somewhere .. look for it on itch.io or steam .. support it with a one time buy-in. If it isn't there .. let it rideThey get $103,993 a month, $1.2 million dollars a year (give or take after taxes) and still cant put a story in the game after almost 5 years of development. Straight up cash grab and ive been following this game since the begining.
how about freedom to think about something before trying ?Maybe you should try the build before reacting like that, just saying.
Eh, I've never complained about Patreon. People have to get funded somehow.So many people here throw complaints about how slow these devs are and how dumb of a funding system patreon is... why? Whats the alternative? A great utopia where the best sex games ever just grown on trees and all your wishes are fulfileld by the selfless AAA developers of adult genre? Get realistic...
The real alternative is no patreon, no wild life, no breederes of the nephelym, no f95. Thanks but no thanks. Id rather have slow patreon devs that at least make something I can enjoy for what it is than none at all.
...and? While it is lacking in content, the only reason I brought it up was that it looks better (in my opinion), and runs better on its respective highest graphics settings. I could go on my own separate rant about things I find disappointing about BotN but this isn't really the thread for that. The BotN patreon also has a not-insignificant 4,000-ish less patrons than Wild Life's but I'd still rather play its limited content than whatever the fuck's going on in this game.Breeders of Nephelym has no content bruh![]()
we never know...Daz Renpy Render Games are in another Direction macadam you must be wrong here![]()
I don't really follow development of this game too closely, I download newest build like once per year. Also I don't want to be toxic or attack devs but from my perspective, looking back and checking change log... well I must agree that patrons should expect more. With serious and constant founding they are really still just a sandbox with some minimal gameplay. I get it that it takes time but looking how things are going we are looking for 10+ years project... Even for small team that too much time for things to go south somehow. And then it all will go to waste.Eh, I've never complained about Patreon. People have to get funded somehow.
But I do think criticism is warranted, when the devs make $100k per month, and four years in, when all that seems to be in the changelogs for each update is "sex scene with ugly monsterman and hot lady added. added another sex scene to a different previously-existing ugly monsterman and different hot lady." I see minimal quality-of-life improvements, but no fixes or changes to actually make the game more enticing to play. After years I see nothing resembling a cohesive story, just different areas to spawn into, talk to an NPC, and then have sex with as both characters clip slightly into the floor.