tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,407
3,288
I found something interesting again.

In the last update, the progress was changed from "75% complete/25% incomplete" to "55% complete/45% incomplete" and 20% rendering was added.

And before version 0.190 was released, I complained, "It looks like the ending of version 0.190 will be the same as the ending of version 0.185," and after version 0.190 was released, I said, "It looks like a handjob scene was added."
(For anyone who will "challenge" me: I'd mentioned the possibility of a handjob scene when I found out about the 20% rendering addition. Maybe)

I checked it now, and assuming that approximately 82 or 83 renderings were added in the last update, there was a possibility that the last update would end before the handjob scene started.

If my guess was correct, this means that the developer had no plans to provide handjob scenes in the last update.

And in this update, the developer said he is adding 100 renderings.
(I said almost nothing about this update, Maybe)

It's also possible that this developer added something he didn't want (but what subscribers wanted).

(If you want something, you should say “I want it,” not “I believe it.”)
 
Last edited:

Couto25

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2023
1,033
2,206
(If you want something, you should say “I want it,” not “I believe it.”)
[/QUOTE]
I want sophia sex...and I am talking on behalf of whole AWAM community.....maybe beside dylan/teen fanbase aside:ROFLMAO:
 
  • Like
Reactions: tofhdns

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,407
3,288
The point where LP changed his mind was initially planning for Sophia to undress completely but then reconsidered.
We can see in the scene where Sophia initially takes off her pants while sitting with Dylan and then puts them back on :ROFLMAO:
I interpreted the scene the other way.

This is what I thought, this developer didn't plan on taking their clothes off in the first place, but he needed to show his subscribers something, so he took them off and put them back on.

But even if that's not the case, this isn't the first time the developer has taken off a character's clothes and put them back on.

Additionally, there doesn't need to be 20% more rendering from the last update for that scene.
 
Last edited:

Radoslaw Wolf

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,918
6,070
We can see in the scene where Sophia initially takes off her pants while sitting with Dylan and then puts them back on :ROFLMAO:
Which was a complete nonsense - just like Dylan's doing the same thing in the bathtub before - and totally spoiled the mood, the rhythm, etc.
OK, we get it: you're trying to painfully slowly hint on the progress, but can it, kindly please, at least make some sense...?
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,407
3,288
Technically you can be both right, I guess..? :unsure:
I can't accept it.

If we accept that statement, it means that this developer tried to take the character's clothes off, put them back on, and then added a handjob scene.

I'm now saying that this developer had no intention of stripping the character, but did so (even though briefly) and included a handjob scene.

It's a completely different thing.

The only thing I can compromise is “This developer may have rehashed the scene shown in version 0.185.”

But your thoughts are your choice.
 
Last edited:

Radoslaw Wolf

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,918
6,070
I can't accept it.

If we accept that statement, it means that this developer tried to take the character's clothes off, put them back on, and then added a handjob scene.

I'm now saying that this developer had no intention of stripping the character, but did so (even though briefly) and included a handjob scene.

It's a completely different thing.

The only thing I can compromise is “This developer may have rehashed the scene shown in version 0.185.”

But your thoughts are your choice.
If you mean that he is an unstable liar with nothing actually planned or written down even for the upcoming instalment, then...
i-could-not-agree-more-jake-peralta.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: athreusclouds

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,407
3,288
If you mean that he is an unstable liar with nothing actually planned or written down even for the upcoming instalment, then...
View attachment 3145485
I didn't mean to imply that this developer doesn't have any plans, and I'm not that stupid.

I said this developer "added" and most people on this forum are aware of this developer's published schedule.

Of course I criticize this developer as a "liar", but it's not about the schedule, it's about his "words".

My fundamental view on the issue of taking off and putting on a character's clothes is this:

This developer described himself as a religious person or briefly sought God.
This developer also used words such as "guilt/repentance" in reference to making a porn game.
And this developer said that he is making, or wants to make, a work of art, not porn.

Based on this preliminary information, I would say that this developer gave subscribers something they wanted but he didn't want.

And the addition of 80 renderings of handjob scenes is clearly a change/addition to the plan, but that doesn't mean "this developer didn't have any plans."

When we ask for a fork in a restaurant, we don't explain that we are "not intending to kill anyone, but to eat the food."
 

Radoslaw Wolf

Well-Known Member
May 23, 2017
1,918
6,070
I didn't mean to imply that this developer doesn't have any plans, and I'm not that stupid.
I can take that burden on my shoulders and be "that stupid": ha has next to no solid plan for this version (AWAM) - his focus is currently 100% on Steam.
Moreover, this event is being created exactly having in mind it will be a filler for the content removed from Part 2.
Change my mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JustAUser89
3.20 star(s) 466 Votes