OZtheW1ZARD

Member
Aug 24, 2021
173
425
I found you to be an asshole cheater.

The number 2328 for 2020 year that you wrote is the same as mine.

However, the 2019 year number 2480 you wrote was different from mine, and I found that you arbitrarily omitted the number 295.
(This is why you didn't write down the numbers for each year until the end.)

And I also found the reason why you wrote that the % in 2019 year compared to 2018 year was 7.3%.
You listed the total number of renders for 2018 divided by 365 (one years), not as a relative year percentage.
(This is why you didn't write down the numbers for each year until the end.)

You are either a truly retarded fool or a fraud.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
AGINAIN IN BOLD, I USED NUMBERS PROVIDED BY THIS PERSON IN THIS POST:
https://f95zone.to/threads/a-wife-and-mother-v0-201-lust-passion.5944/post-14051756

Here is the screen capture:

1718960712072.png


I will walk you through my process step by step because you clearly do not understand. I will use 2019 - 2020 as an example:

2019 - 2480
2020 - 2328

We want to know how much % wise 2020 (2328) is when compared to 2020 (2480).
We can do that using this equation:

(2019/100% = 2020/X%) and solve for X.

We know the values for 2019 and 2020 so lets put these into the equation:

2480/100% = 2328/X%
X = 232800/2328
X = 93.87%

Now, to get the % difference we need to subtract the X% value from 100%:

% = 100 - 93.87 = 6.12% (6.1% when rounded down)

This is 2ndary level Maths.


Also, to challenge your method how can you have 16.1% for 2019 - 2020?

2019 = 2480 renders, 10% of that is 248 renders,
2020 = 2328 renders, 2480 - 2328 = 152

When you subtract 2019 - 2020 you will get 152 renders. The difference is way less than 248 renders needed to achieve 10%,
How the fuck did you get 16%? To achieve 16% you need the difference to be 372 renders!
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,413
3,300
AGINAIN IN BOLD, I USED NUMBERS PROVIDED BY THIS PERSON IN THIS POST:
https://f95zone.to/threads/a-wife-and-mother-v0-201-lust-passion.5944/post-14051756

Here is the screen capture:

View attachment 3756064


I will walk you through my process step by step because you clearly do not understand. I will use 2019 - 2020 as an example:

2019 - 2480
2020 - 2328

We want to know how much % wise 2020 (2328) is when compared to 2020 (2480).
We can do that using this equation:

(2019/100% = 2020/X%) and solve for X.

We know the values for 2019 and 2020 so lets put these into the equation:

2480/100% = 2328/X%
X = 232800/2328
X = 93.87%

Now, to get the % difference we need to subtract the X% value from 100%:

% = 100 - 93.87 = 6.12% (6.1% when rounded down)

This is 2ndary level Maths.


Also, to challenge your method how can you have 16.1% for 2019 - 2020?

2019 = 2480 renders, 10% of that is 248 renders,
2020 = 2328 renders, 2480 - 2328 = 152

When you subtract 2019 - 2020 you will get 152 renders. The difference is way less than 248 renders needed to achieve 10%,
How the fuck did you get 16%? To achieve 16% you need the difference to be 372 renders!
I clearly said, “You are not doing anything on your own.”

And even if calculated based on the above data, the difference in 2019 compared to 2018 is not 7.3%.

If you don't want to be called an asshole, recalculate the data and apologize.

*And I “already” stated that I calculated from January 1st to December 31st.*
*The above data is not mine.*
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Also, even if calculated based on the above data, the figure for 2023 compared to 2022 is also not 12.5%.
 
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: Alea iacta est

OZtheW1ZARD

Member
Aug 24, 2021
173
425
I clearly said, “You are not doing anything on your own.”

And even if calculated based on the above data, the difference in 2019 compared to 2018 is not 7.3%.

If you don't want to be called an asshole, recalculate the data and apologize.

*And I “already” stated that I calculated from January 1st to December 31st.*
*The above data is not mine.*
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Also, even if calculated based on the above data, the figure for 2023 compared to 2022 is also not 12.5%.
You are correct, it is 7.6 and not 7.3. No idea what happened, must have mistyped a number or something.
I will get this updated and correct the massive 0.3 mistake.
 

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,413
3,300
You are correct, it is 7.6 and not 7.3. No idea what happened, must have mistyped a number or something.
I will get this updated and correct the massive 0.3 mistake.
You should also apologize for the incorrect numbers for 2019 compared to 2018.
 

holy_cat

Newbie
Dec 9, 2020
70
216
The game started with her looking like 32, then he changed her into a 30ish face and late 20ish body. Now she is mid 20s face and very low 20s body (the gym scenes are ridiculous). By the time she has sex, she will look like an 8 yo.
You seem to be right. The problem is in growing discrepancy... Sophia is say ten years younger then she was at the beginning of the game. We are seven years older. Thus the age difference has increased to 17 years.

When she might experience her first extramarital affair (not counting HJs, BJs and Antonio), we would be by another 7-8 years older. Hope Sophia won't look younger than 20 (no, please do not assume she would be underage... though the tendency is clear and this way she might find common language with the sex ed kids). The age difference would be close to thirty.

When L&P finishes the game, we will be a bunch of old timers drooling over a barely legal Sophia. I can imagine this nice view.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: alicesp

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,413
3,300
Oh my God. It is the same formula as provided few posts up.
I found your calculation formula. So I deleted my post.

Oh my God. It is the same formula as provided few posts up.
I had overlooked the difference between relative and decline rates so far, so I didn't wonder about your formula.

Now that I have looked it up, the relative ratio formula does not yield a rate of decline.

So recalculate using the formula to derive the decline rate.
Your formula doesn't fit this situation.
 

OZtheW1ZARD

Member
Aug 24, 2021
173
425
I had overlooked the difference between relative and decline rates so far, so I didn't wonder about your formula.

Now that I have looked it up, the relative ratio formula does not yield a rate of decline.

So recalculate using the formula to derive the decline rate.
Your formula doesn't fit this situation.
No, calculation is correct. Year on year % difference in the render count.
Also the graph confirms it.

1718967213905.png

Feel free to share your findings together with methodology if you disagree.
 

sphynks80

Member
Dec 9, 2017
164
275
I have noticed a trend in the Anglo-Saxon world to count, for example, the number of words contained in a text, or as in this case, the number of renders contained in an upgrade. This attention to a purely quantitative aspect is funny for someone who does not belong to your culture. But if the quality is high, how many renders are included in an upgrade, what does it matter? Well, the world is beautiful because it is varied...
 
  • Yay, new update!
Reactions: 1879

hmc15

Active Member
Apr 4, 2019
535
906
The game started with her looking like 32, then he changed her into a 30ish face and late 20ish body. Now she is mid 20s face and very low 20s body (the gym scenes are ridiculous). By the time she has sex, she will look like an 8 yo.
Simultaneously the boys have become literal men.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: alicesp

tofhdns

Well-Known Member
Jan 25, 2021
1,413
3,300
You know it is. Why are you asking?
You know it is the same as 1646/100=1883/X right?)
This is the relative ratio you calculated.
"=((1646/1883)*100)-100"
And the result is 12.58%.

This is the decline rate I calculated.
"=(1646-1883)/1646*100"
And the result is 14.39%.

And I included 760 in the above calculation (for your benefit), but again, that is a January 2024 figure so it should not be included in the above calculation.
 

palmtrees89

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2021
1,645
10,256
Go argue with the person who provided the numbers.
I've actually made a little oopsie when I added the numbers together. Added a missing update from 2019 (aswell as the percentages);

2018: 2685 renders
2019: 2775 renders - 3.35196% increase compared to 2018
2020: 2328 renders - 16.1081% decrease compared to 2019
2021: 1872 renders - 19.5876% decrease compared to 2020
2022: 1646 renders - 12.0726% decrease compared to 2021
2023: 1123 renders - 31.774% decrease compared to 2022

Or alternatively, if you wanna add v0.195 from January 6th 2024 to 2023;

2023(v2): 1887 renders - 14.6416% increase compared to 2022

Now you guys can continue ... :p
 

OZtheW1ZARD

Member
Aug 24, 2021
173
425
I've actually made a little oopsie when I added the numbers together. Added a missing update from 2019 (aswell as the percentages);

2018: 2685 renders
2019: 2775 renders - 3.35196% increase compared to 2018
2020: 2328 renders - 16.1081% decrease compared to 2019
2021: 1872 renders - 19.5876% decrease compared to 2020
2022: 1646 renders - 12.0726% decrease compared to 2021
2023: 1123 renders - 31.774% decrease compared to 2022

Or alternatively, if you wanna add v0.195 from January 6th 2024 to 2023;

2023(v2): 1887 renders - 14.6416% increase compared to 2022

Now you guys can continue ... :p
Thanks :) I know, right? :D

To be honest I wasn't sure about including those 700ish renders in 2023, but since these were allegedly done in 2023 and only came out in 2024 because of some rework or something, and you have included them yourself, I decided to follow your numbers (y)
 
3.20 star(s) 466 Votes