- Nov 13, 2022
- 2,590
- 8,615
Do you think you have a chance against Ser Theobald de Burke, the Duke de Preps?
So naive...
What an impudent impostor!
This peasant attack on a person of noble blood will not go unpunished.
Think before you speak sir KARAMABA. I am of Noble lineage my dad may be come from a family of peasant. But my Mother is of a Noble lineage. Do not forget that your so called, do not posses of any Noble lineage, he is just by adopted by the Burke Dukedom
He is not qualified to become the Head of the Burke. His sister Lady Sage of Burke is far more suited to become the true heir.
These are all insinuations.
It is impossible to doubt the nobility of the generous Ser Theobald.
His name is already worthy of mention among the most noble lords, such as Tancred of Hauteville , Godfrey of Bouillon, Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar and King Richard the Lionheart himself.
Due to the fact that Lady Jill was deaf to reason, Ser Theobald had to resort to deception.
But it was a lie for the good.
Of course you can deny it.
I see your desire to defame Ser Theobald's honor.
This is, of course, out of envy for his impeccable reputation and noble birth.
Well, it doesn't matter.
If his father considered Ser Theobald worthy of the title, no one can dispute that.
And yes, that ugly watermelon story.
In fact, there is no crime in this. It's just a rush of passion.
Nothing human is alien, even to such noble and impeccable heroes as Ser Theobald.
With his countless exploits, he redeems it.
Countless exploits of what we all know he takes credit for the accomplishment of the others. He doesn't have anything to prove he is worthy of the you mention. He is nothing but impostor
His father is not the only responsible if his mother deemed Theobald unworthy of his title Lady Jade Dutchess of Burke can revoke his title and her sister Lady Sage will be the new ruler of the dukedom.
Also because of the incident of water melon the evidence of thievery is also proven. The under garment of Lady Jill is being used as an instrument for this so called rush of passion you mention
Funny you mention Sir Trent, I heard from Lady Jill that Sir Trent never plan on suing Tremolo in the first place. He mention to Lady Jill that he is the one who stopped Sir Tyballs on his stupid tantrum because of a ruined suit.
In the incident lady Jill also mention that there was a fire during one of the gathering in the dukedom, but Sir Trent denied any statement Sir Tyballs mention. Because of this Lady Jill and Sir Trent confronted Sir Tyballs and they've seen the what he did to the poor water melon
Witnesses?
And who are these witnesses?
Isn't that the crooked peasant who envies Ser Theobald and wants to defame him?
The testimony of such a witness is invalid.
I protest.
This is an abuse of private information.
No character in the game sees this.
Which means it can't be evidence of a crime.
Your Sir Tyballs has been caught red handed and now your telking me this evidence can't be used don't make laugh we have enough evidence to remove him to his position and no one can stop us
Return to Lady Jill? Tha Sur Tyballs of yours mention that there are Burglars and the under garment was stolen and he try to take it back but did not suceed. Now you are telling me that he return them to Lady Jill.
Would you like me to ask Lady Jill if the stolen under garment are returned???
Seriously the replacement for darkwen is role playing games like fucking british.
Last edited:
