Bella's visit is optional and this scene is fixed.
Bella was just an example. Fucking is not the only thing people get in trouble for. You'll never know what sort of skeletons your target is hiding in his closet unless you spy on him.
I'm onboard this train. Besides, if Quinn were really the antagonist she would be neither out for the HOTS nor fuckable. Everything she has done has been motivated by keeping the HOTS funded. Her methods may be scrutable but anyone who says they wouldn't let her fuck them silly is lying. She is that kind of girl and guys like that. We're not talking serious relationship or marriage material here. We're talking she probably takes it in the ass and the face. She is the antithesis of, say, Jill.
Someone is dimming the lights. Probably the one who walked past the windows before. After a magnification and a little more contrast and brightness you can see that.
if it was just voyeurism it wouldn't matter, the DIKs know that MC is alone that night, who would they expect to catch him with?
then we see a shadow pass in front of the lights, don't go near the window and he sees worse from outside than we see him from inside
to me it seems much more significant that there is a DIk who for some reason goes out secretly (for evidently personal business) in the middle of the night, not that there is someone who at every opportunity goes to spy on Mc hoping to catch him with someone, when with Bella it is optional, and that night there is clearly no one and the DIKS know this
No one actually. There are two rooms only above and Jamie's room is above the bathroom next to MC's room.Someone is dimming the lights. Probably the one who walked past the windows before. After a magnification and a little more contrast and brightness you can see that.
View attachment 1123236
My interpretation of the shadow is that someone is sneaking into the house. Since it is probably a DIK, he does not want to be seen leaving and/or entering the house.
Who has the room directly above MC Library?
Yep, OFT absolutely nailed it. This one is now fact and no longer theory imo. The only thing that remains a mystery is who is the painting/picture of? Seems like the most likely possibilities would be: 1) James 2) Bella's child 3) Bella's father
It's not for lack of memory that he won't have mentioned Lynette's surname, it's simply not been necessary. I'd say it's far more likely for Neil to have said something along the lines of, "Your mother's name was Lynette", than to say, "You mother's name was Lynette [surname]". Even for the MC, to ask after the first statement, "what was her last name?" does not seem like a natural follow-up. It's irrelevant information to a child who may also naturally assume that their parents were married and therefore shared the same last name.
This game is not The Blacklist. It's one of the furthest things that DPC could possibly gleam any inspiration for this game from. Stop using it as a reference point for theories.Why not?
"The Blacklist" inspired me to the theory.
We know from Jade that Stephen cheated to get his doctorate. We don't know how. I'm also happy to accept another theory, with appropriate arguments.
Protagonists and antagonists having romantic or even just sexual relationships is not something new or unheard of. Batman fucks Catwoman on the regular and she's been considered an antagonist for most of her existence. Another most famous example is Gone with the Wind where Scarlett O'Hara (the protagonist) has a relationship with and even marries the antagonist Rhett Butler.
Maybe you explained it better than I can how we see the same things differently. In Gone With The Wind, I considered Scarlett to be the antagonist. CatWoman also fucked with Batman's head just because she could. In that way I do see a lot of resemblance with Quinn, who does the same to certain parties just because she can. But even if we take DPC at face value that Quinn is an antagonist, even if not the primary antagonist, I'm more interested in the endgame. She obviously can't continue to fund the HOTS through specious means. It would be ridiculous to have the MC save both the DIKS and the HOTS.It's not for lack of memory that he won't have mentioned Lynette's surname, it's simply not been necessary. I'd say it's far more likely for Neil to have said something along the lines of, "Your mother's name was Lynette", than to say, "You mother's name was Lynette [surname]". Even for the MC, to ask after the first statement, "what was her last name?" does not seem like a natural follow-up. It's irrelevant information to a child who may also naturally assume that their parents were married and therefore shared the same last name.
I've known people who don't care to know much about estranged family members. An ex-gf was adopted and I asked her once about her real parents and she said she "couldn't give a flying fuck" who they were or where they were, and a friend who's Dad left when her Mom was pregnant said she had no interest to meet him or know who he was. Granted, the death of a parent is somewhat different, but the MC's been told by Neil about how Lynette's family disapproved of him and pretty much shunned her for running away with him, so I can see how, because of that, the MC doesn't care to know who these people are and therefore to know what her surname is.
This game is not The Blacklist. It's one of the furthest things that DPC could possibly gleam any inspiration for this game from. Stop using it as a reference point for theories.
Protagonists and antagonists having romantic or even just sexual relationships is not something new or unheard of. Batman fucks Catwoman on the regular and she's been considered an antagonist for most of her existence. Another most famous example is Gone with the Wind where Scarlett O'Hara (the protagonist) has a relationship with and even marries the antagonist Rhett Butler.
An antagonist is not always the same as a villain, they're just the character who pushes back against the protagonist, blocking them from certain things, and proving to be a veritable thorn in the protag's side. The antagonist's efforts to reach their goal can often determine the story’s path and the escalating conflict, and this description seems to fit Quinn perfectly.
Probably fully unlocked chapter 8.I saw this image and I thought "What are the other requirements to be able to unlock this image in the game completely? Because there were 3 and I had only one completed
And I think I remember that DPC had published an image of the new phone where he had Cathy in the wallpaper
So if each girl has 3 requirements to complete, does that mean that each girl will have 2 events for this episode?
And can we unlock all the drawings in this chapter or just some girls?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
but this is not the case, Mc was not abandoned or given in adoption, he has no reason to have negative feelings towards his mother.
Eh, it might be possible, but that's a stretch and we basically have no proof. It could have been anybody outside and I don't remember seeing anything different in the mansion to be able to claim that someone sneaked in.What if Jamie is gay?
That, like Troy, he's sneaking out of the house?
Leon had to really talk Jamie into fucking Arieth. He has a feminist for a girlfriend. Maybe in the hope that he won't have to fuck his girlfriend so often. (Yes I know she thought she was pregnant).
Just a few thoughts.
Jamie being gay or straight or a woman or a ghost or whatever the fuck doesn't matter.What if Jamie is gay?
That, like Troy, he's sneaking out of the house?
Leon had to really talk Jamie into fucking Arieth. He has a feminist for a girlfriend. Maybe in the hope that he won't have to fuck his girlfriend so often. (Yes I know she thought she was pregnant).
Just a few thoughts.
It makes me want to play an alternate version of this game with that drawing styleEven in 2D, Maya is hot!
Whenever there is a free-roam I try to get as much money as possible (But DPC always looks for a way to make us spend money on other things)
I think the entire Lynette thing is being overthought. There has been no mention of her since the prologue. There has been no mention of any of her family, even in passing. One would think there would at least be some reference to her side of the family, even at the funeral, if that was to be part of the story. If something about Lynette's past shows up in this story this far in, out of fuck all nowhere, it's not good writing. I have family I've never met at all but I know their names and can trace their lineage and could contact them if I so desired. The MC hasn't made the slightest effort to do any such thing nor has anyone from Lynette's family made any effort to contact him. It's not as though Neil could prevent that now, even if he was preventing it previously. So, if her family was any kind of royalty in this story they would have knowledge the MC was attending B&R and ways of contacting him. All of this nonsense would take the plot so far off course that it simply doesn't make any sense to include it. The name of the game is "Being A DIK", something Lynette obviously could never have done.
in the first part of the story he is also MC's antagonist. everything we are told about her is negative, she has to do with drugs, together with Tommy they conspire against their superiors, she always has a harsh attitude against poor Riona (who is the only one with whom she has an apparently more sincere relationship)...
In regards to MC not making the effort to contact his extended family, some people are just like that. Being Indian, I have a huge extended family. I could not tell you a single name or how I'm related to any of them. I don't even know my mother's sisters' children's names. When they have no direct impact or presence in your life... for some people, there's no desire to go find out. Your attention is on the things within your immediaite grasp.
