Yes. Technically it is without a doubt. In a more practical way, regardless of your post-christian prejudices, there is no doubt it requires creativity. And that was my point.
Actually, that's unfair for christianity, you will be amazed on the ammount of pornoraphy there is in medieval classical literature.
That it's the mid/late part of the story, after an uber-duper dramatic choice built up by DCP for all of S2, yet suddenly we're taking a u into ex territory.
You keep describing what happened but you still cannot make a point on how that's bad.
Make it a zombie apocalypse, then, if all drama is good. Or maybe don't, since it'd come out of nowhere.
And that's a succesfull genre, isn't. But anyhow as an anlogy, yours doesn't really work. The problem to insert a zomby apocalyps in the middle of this story it's that change the nature of the story itself and not that adds more drama. Zoey ads conflict but doesn't change the nature of the story, romantic conflict in a college context.
To make Zoey comes back as disruptive element is not only acceptable, its a fucking classic. And it's couse it works. That's why you still can think of a narrative reason to reject this.
In context, i was comparing this character to others, in relation to what your argument that somehow people who are concerned about what's coming are 'selfish' because they'd rather be dealing with the ramifications of the crossway, rather than be shoved in a love-triangle.
Then don't complain about "drama", it doesn't have any sense and it doesn't make your point.
Now your concern has no ground since anyone knows that next episode we will have both.
Because Quinn, like other side-girls, has the most to lose from the introduction of a new major player, or those of a few minor ones.
No, it's because is your favorite. Period.
Again you should considerer there is a world outside the small length of your own dick.
