Tbh one thing he needs to focus on and that will piss some people off because it takes time and doesn't give many scenes is the coherence. Sister let's you watch her topless, but doesn't let you in on her room in the weekend when she's just wearing panties... mom let's you massage her naked, but don't you dare try to see her naked in the shower at night... Older sister let's you watch her cam shows and her naked top in the pool but don't you dare walk in on her changing her top...
Small little events and small little aspects but it would really bright up the game to see all of these small little things added. So you really see a progress in the house at all times instead of just seeing the progress when you start a new step of an opportunity.
Hey thats really good, I remember in 0.3 if Max give in to Eric , and on the 4th(i think) peep on them, Max got caught , but Eric actually managed to convince Ann thats good sex-ed for Max. And thats the end (with end of version msg), I thought . Usually Max get kick out of Ann room for watching her change , but on the next day , when Ann kicking him out , Max actually brought up the issue , and Ann relent and think maybe its a good idea for him to watch Ann change for sake of his "developement" . Its a small thing but not even a big sexual scene, but the efforts make to make the continuation really make me "whoa" , now that some great story flow and game continuity attention to minor details. In fact it actually pique my "naughty" interest what else can Eric convince Ann do for the sake of her son's "development" hehehe. Unfortunately that line story pretty much died-ed there... maybe too distracted or obstructed to continue I guess.
I've had this NTR discussion far too many times, so forgive my reluctance to start it again. I hope this will be the last time. NTR doesn't have a specific definition. You're making it very specific because Max doesn't have an established relationship with anyone in this game. That's not the point. NTR is labeled with any jealous feeling that makes one FEEL like their interest was taken from them. Whether it's their's to be stolen or not is irrelevant and that's the point. NTR is based strictly on a feeling, most of the time, an irrational feeling, not a specification. That's what makes it so controversial. Either way, the NTR definition topic was NOT the point I was making whatsoever in my previous discussion.
So what happen to "cuck the fuck outta you" , now its a transient jealous feeling??
Now your argument is NTR doesn't have specific definition , and you can change whatever u want and whenever you want to suit your argument?
Really then , I play to your (now) tune , and see what NTR change later to your "not specific definition".
So "NTR is labeled with any jealous feeling that makes one FEEL like their interest was taken from them" your quote now before you change to any new context base on the argument that NTR has no specific definition. Do you think Eric will feel jealous if u steal Ann away from him?
question to yourself - "Are you okie in taking Ann away from Eric"?
Frankly we all know the answer to that.. if you say OK , u are OK to NTR.. simple full stop fact. If you say yes and still wanna argue some silly pt to push into your definition of NTR , u either belong to
a) I am okie with NTR as long as I am the one doing it , and I don't like to be NTRed
b) I just wanna screw every girl myself (regardless they are sombody's else wives , gf , sweetheart , bitches) , NO other guys can show their dicks in MY game.
Given that grp A ppl just don't want to share what are theirs , and don't mind sharing what is not theirs (don't trigger jealousy). And judging by so call anti NTR responses , lets be honest , its (b) right?
Why on earth do guys keep using anti-NTR to mask your true fantasy , thats is to screw everyone without competition is beyond my understanding. Its not even a bad thing.
All I'm saying is that this very discussion is proving my point that I was making in my statement about Eric being a "great villain". The everlasting argument of NTR is the reason for Eric's relevance as someone said he was a great villain and I wanted to shut that BS down. It had nothing to do with definitions or specifics. I simply made a general statement to debunk Eric being called a "great villain" due to the hate he generates.
Sorry I am not being a troll or anything , but I really can't understand what you trying to convey .. and I apologize first in case you think I am trolling you and cannot give a comment on this.
I think it goes on the line of "He is successful at doing bad things , but he's not a great villain?" Again I am really not trolling , I really trying to figure that out tbh.