easy85
Member
- Apr 16, 2018
- 328
- 638
- 297
Acerola released patches on their blog in quick succession, often a few of them per day, fixing minor issues. As you can imagine, you can't release something like that on DLsite. So they did release only major fixes and compilations of smaller patches. The game wasn't broken at release so there was no hurry but if you wanted the newest patch, you could go to Acerola's blog and download it. You could even say that blog patches are "beta versions" while DLsite patches are "releases".Exactly, we can assume, but don't know for sure. At first I didn't even know the version number of the japanese version is actually v1.18 and guessed that v1.05 is the game version and not the version translation. Only after digging through the blog I found out about the v1.18 part.
Also, there's that Kagura Games released a V4 patch and both DLsites, english and japanese, have four patches listed, all the while the developer has... another twelve on top of that on their blog.
Hence my confusion about the version numbering and change-logs. Something I've said before and simply gave Mizukipon what I found for them to make their own judgement and maybe something to read out of curiosity, since they claimed to be interested in the change-logs for the game and Kagura Games didn't seem to release any.
All of this is irrelevant since Kagura version is independent. Their game version is always v1.00 (unless they patch it before initial release) no matter what number is japanese or english dlsite version. And since they were working on it long after Acerola finished fixed it (Acerola released another game even before we got Colette...), we can safely assume Kagura got the newest files from the developer.
If you are playing Kagura's version, it's best to not even look at DLsite (english or japanese) or japanese developer's blog.