Having just played Broken Hearts Club I feel compelled to post my comments on the game because of one, to me, glaring flaw: the assertion that a police force would not prosecute an accusation of rape, when full physical evidence has been gathered, due to budget scrutiny (and the reaction of MC to that fact).
Firstly, let me say that I really enjoyed the game otherwise. As with most players I found the MC to be one of the most mature and likeable I have ever encountered in a porn game. I also really liked the character models (that for Sandi in particular) because they are all new and unique, and am keen to see where the game goes (I hope Shane doesn't become too in-your-face in her pursuit of MC !).
However, having worked for nearly 20 years as a forensic scientist specifically in the field of DNA analysis/profiling I can assure you that whilst budget pressures have put a severe strain on police forces (in my country at least, which is England) they are more concerned about conviction rates in regards to expense. The cost of a single split pref extraction would not be that great, and in the circumstances shown, would probably be all that was required to yield a full profile, almost certainly guaranteeing a conviction.
A far more plausible method of negating the DNA evidence would be if the chain of continuity from sample collection to presentation of the profile at court could be broken. As an example of what I mean, a common trick of defence lawyers was to summon every operator who worked on a case to give expert witness testimony confirming their work (and theoretically there could be one for each stage: extraction, quantification, PCR, electrophoresis, analysis, genotyping and final check) in the hopes that one would be unable to attend - this would mean that the continuity would be cast in doubt and the evidence inadmissible. In my opinion a far, far more convincing reason for the lack of prosecution would be if the Chief of Police, a pal of the rapist's father, arranged for the labelling/unique identifiers on the evidence bags to be tampered with, or 'lost'.
Also, I found MC's reaction to the news ("good old home justice") very unconvincing. If my daughter had been raped and I was told the police were not going to pursue the criminal because of cost, my reaction would be much, much more intense. As in violently furious. It would not be that difficult to stir up some kind of media interest in the story of a police force unwilling to investigate a rape - a crime they had categorised as low priority and of "minimal damage" - due to cost !
