- Thread starter DearLegend37
- Start date
Errors I've noticed:
- Emilia's group scene endings play Scarlett's endings instead.
- Margot's anal scenes only play the first clip.
- Scarlett group scenes arent moving past 3.
- Scarlett group scenes end with handjob finishes.
So in V1.21 the codes look like
<<set $patreona to true>>
<<elseif _hash is 474455424>>
which means it is hash, but I ran it through a decoder, but nothing came up any way to get through this?
- Mar 13, 2018
- 123
- 97
- Nov 21, 2017
- 20
- 45
How is supporting someone publishing a game that features celebrity deep fakes on their platform open Patreon to lawsuits more than publishing a game that features regular porn? News flash: Games that feature porn clips blatantly violate copyright laws. So why are deepfakes magically worse? They are based on publicly available images of celebrities. If anything the party that's being hurt by this is are the porn studios that produced the clips. Their content is being shared illegally. Which brings me back to my previous point, why pron clips and images being illegally shared are not a problem, but sharing porn clips with parts of publicly available images photoshopped on them is a big problem?
- Jul 10, 2017
- 6,158
- 6,556
Why don't you contact Patreon and ask why its worse?
So, with porn games, while yes, it is still technically copyright infringement to include those videos, the actresses in said videos gave written and legal consent to appear in and have their likeness used in those videos. Porn itself is also legal. With deepfakes, however, those are much more dangerous because, while the act of deepfaking itself isnt illegal, the usage of the actors likeness without permission, by technicality, is, and if the actor wanted, they could press charges. These kinds of charges go through Patreon, rather than directly at the creators, similar to YouTube, so it would be safer for Patreon to just take the project down rather than fight the suit.
Celebrities also have a public image to maintain, so the lawsuit could also be a claim towards defamation, which is much harder to dispute. If disputing the fact that it's their likeness isnt hard enough. Hope that helps explain things.
- Nov 21, 2017
- 20
- 45
I don't think this is a very constructive response.
Sure. But they did not agree to have their likeness used in Patreon games. They gave specific permission to appear in a specific video published by a specific company. They did not give blanket permission to everyone to use out-of-context clips of their work in their own games. In other words, the permission they gave to the porn studio doesn't apply in the least to the person who steals the porn studio work and publishes it in their own game.
Using the porn actor's likeness without permission is also illegal. Like I stated above. None of the porn actors who appear in patron games gave permission that their work and likeness would be used in such away.
How is it different from suits filed by porn actors or porn studios? By that logic, Pateron should prohibit all copyright-infringing games.
Why is Paparazzi photography legal then? They use images of celebrities without their consent (Sometimes even naked images) without any permission to use their likeness.
About defamation. I think a defamation suit will only fly if it can be proven that people actually think this is the person in the video. For example, if Emilia Clarke wants to sue for defamation she needs to prove that the author of the game is saying it actually is her in the video.
In other words, if a reasonable consumer of this game boots it up and then sees a deepfake hardcore video of Emilia Clarke and thinks "Oh my god, I can't believe she did a hardcore porn video. She's a mainstream actor my opinion of her is changed." then it's defamation. However, if he thinks "Gee those deepfakes sure did come a long way. This really looks like Emilia Clarke. Though it's obvious to me it isn't actually her" then it's not really defamation.
And if you put a huge disclaimer at the start of your game saying "This is a work of fiction, all characters are imaginary and any similarity between appearance, names, places in the game and reality is purely a coincidence."
You significantly minimize the number of people who might have actually thought it is really the actual mainstream actor in the hardcore porn video. To the point where if someone does think this is really Emilia Clarke, it would be proper to call them unreasonable.
- Jul 10, 2017
- 6,158
- 6,556
Paparazzi is legal in PUBLIC SPACE. When using means to take photos of someone in their "private sphere" (no public space), its not. And there been countless of cases where newspapers and other magazines been sued over and over and over for publish such images.
You don't see very often porn actress's and such sue for copyright violation of images. At a point in time the adult movie industry was going hard after people pirating porn movies on torrent etc though. People got sent letters of "pay x or we sue you", but doubt that occur much these days as the industry moved towards streaming and just internet services.
Regular movie actress's and such they didn't sign up to be portrayed and used in porn. It doesn't matter if people really believe it is them or not, it is how they are being portrayed. It's pointless to argue this because it just go off topic and posts get deleted, but to make it short. "you are wrong..."
to get codes, edit Celebrity_Brothel.html with a text editor:
1) find lines where code is converted and tested (~l5439)
if _hash is 663010138
...
elseif _hash is 474455424
...
elseif _hash is 794950207
2) instead of testing hashed string, just test variable _answer and set simple paswords;
if _answer is "code1"
...
elseif _answer is "code2"
...
elseif _answer is "code3"
...
password are now code1, code2, ...
1) find lines where code is converted and tested (~l5439)
if _hash is 663010138
...
elseif _hash is 474455424
...
elseif _hash is 794950207
2) instead of testing hashed string, just test variable _answer and set simple paswords;
if _answer is "code1"
...
elseif _answer is "code2"
...
elseif _answer is "code3"
...
password are now code1, code2, ...
- Feb 14, 2018
- 36
- 7
if yall want cheats (also works on any games using Sugarcube) you can use the console to edit your money
1. Right click on page > Inspect
2. Click console tab
3. type (or paste, duh) Sugarcube.State.active.variables
4. expand the answer and search for the variable you want to edit (in this game's case it's dinero)
5. double click the number (it's probably 400 by the time you're just made the first mask) to whatever you like
6. to update the number just simply move somewhere or bet small money at casino
7. hopefully this is easy enough for yall
I did this on chrome, might be different for other browsers tho
1. Right click on page > Inspect
2. Click console tab
3. type (or paste, duh) Sugarcube.State.active.variables
4. expand the answer and search for the variable you want to edit (in this game's case it's dinero)
5. double click the number (it's probably 400 by the time you're just made the first mask) to whatever you like
6. to update the number just simply move somewhere or bet small money at casino
7. hopefully this is easy enough for yall
I did this on chrome, might be different for other browsers tho
To improve/make easier tototutu's solution you can just add the unlock line to the incorrect password code line:
<<set $patreona to true>><<set $patreona5 to true>><<set $patreona15 to true>>
just after the: <<run UI.alert("You did not supply a password!"
>> row. (create a new row)
That way you have nothing to type and just click the "check password" button.
<<set $patreona to true>><<set $patreona5 to true>><<set $patreona15 to true>>
just after the: <<run UI.alert("You did not supply a password!"
>> row. (create a new row)That way you have nothing to type and just click the "check password" button.