Others Corruption of Champions II [v0.7.15] [Savin/Salamander Studios]

[jfmherokiller]

i wonder if i can somehow run tits inside of CoC2. tho the other way around sounds better

 

[Biostar]

Even if Evelyn had a vagina I would still be less interested in her than I am in Vivianne, which is saying a lot.

And once Grainne gets plowed in what I'm told is a rather... 'intense' scene, dependent on execution, I might end up disregarding the entire grove.

Goddammit, what are those fucks trying to ruin now?

Speaking of nothing, we know (some) of the plans regarding that 'less slutty' route. However, this

Alypia is fitting in just fine with the other dumbasses.

 

[Martin2]

Who the fuck is Evelyn again?

A noble lady with a penis you can meet in the Frosthound.

 

[Doran]

I have a completely different rant on Brienne and the type of player that I think, personally, shouldn't be catered to at all - but that's a much longer conversation so I'll cut it off there.

Now, I am curios as to what you mean by this.

 

[claralover]

Not that i don't get it, but at the same time Skow turned her lesbian and Tobs had her raped. Which make up for two out of three times she was written by other people. That's not writers caring about the characters or other people's work and trying to get it right, it's people actively giving no shits and doing whatever - because (my OC's awesome so let's get her another girlfriend/my OC's better so fuck this cow also i'm out of meds).

Which again, not that you're wrong, would certainly be a lot of pressure and honestly as things stand you're probably right in that anything of the like is best left to Wsan, but as things stand. Had Tobs respected his colleague's work like he does his own then we wouldn't be talking about a rape scene but rather some longwinded Brienne/Kiyoko threesomes.

But, not the reality we live in so i guess Brienne's best left safe in the cow bubble. Which, great bubble but shit's just cartoony. Like great companion in AAA RPG living on their own side of the camp because every other writer is in it for themselves and at any chance might put the dumbest shit in their mouth cartoony (see Etheryn for what happens when everyone's allowed their take - and also her main guy's take changes overtime for reasons ).

did you reply to the wrong comment by any chance?

 

[MoneyMan181]

Excuse me if I'm being dense, this was only very lightly glossed over: Hasn't Sera proven that you can make a sub route to an otherwise dominant character(and have it be their defining trait) and have it work?

If Sera released without her sub route, you'd obviously think that's antithetical to her character right? But we can see with her that you can develop a character's appeal to be more than just if you dominate or submit to them.

Even if a route can be considered antithetical to the character, that can be the ENTIRE reason something is more attractive, no? Role reversal itself can oftentimes be more appealing than having just the one option. I know I for one find the idea of turning the tables on a dommy futa(because no dommy vagina havers lol) very attractive, but that's not really a common option in these games which is pretty sad.

 

[Wrynn13]

Everyone wan

Evelyn as a character is sold to players as a dom. People that like Evelyn like her because she is a dom. Making her a sub would be an entirely different ballpark in terms of appeal-

And doing so would put her in the same place as characters like Arona and Sera, expanding her appeal to people that aren't into doms. Why is this a problem? I hate almonds so all you fuckers who keep buying almond joys are ruining my mounds. Like seriously?

 

[Skandranon]

Excuse me if I'm being dense, this was only very lightly glossed over: Hasn't Sera proven that you can make a sub route to an otherwise dominant character(and have it be their defining trait) and have it work?

If Sera released without her sub route, you'd obviously think that's antithetical to her character right? But we can see with her that you can develop a character's appeal to be more than just if you dominate or submit to them.

Even if a route can be considered antithetical to the character, that can be the ENTIRE reason something is more attractive, no? Role reversal itself can oftentimes be more appealing than having just the one option. I know I for one find the idea of turning the tables on a dommy futa(because no dommy vagina havers lol) very attractive, but that's not really a common option in these games which is pretty sad.

And doing so would put her in the same place as characters like Arona and Sera, expanding her appeal to people that aren't into doms. Why is this a problem? I hate almonds so all you fuckers who keep buying almond joys are ruining my mounds. Like seriously?

Think we've gotten slightly off track here.

The discussion isn't - or at least wasn't - about whether or not it could work. It probably could.

It was about hypocrisy of people being down on one significant character change but championing the other.

Whether or not it should actually happen is a whole 'nother kettle of worms (and a discussion I believe we've had before).

Now, I am curios as to what you mean by this.

Always leave 'em wanting more, that's my motto.

 

[Thatguymercy]

Ok this Eve and Brieanne argument is getting ridiculous especially since both sides are essentially saying the same thing. Guys we all hate when specific fethishes we don't like enter our favorite fetish characters story but kinkshaming each other isn't really doing anything.

Now I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate here and your all gonna stone me when I say it but this is a porn game at the end of the day, a porn game where the main appeal is how open ended it gets hence why it has every tag under the planet. I think a character getting more optional content regardless of whenever you like the fetish or not is a truly good thing, keyword OPTIONAL.

Wherever it's a sub route for Evelyn, a ntr path with Brieanne or a monogamous relationship with Cait. I think coc 2 would be at its best if it allowed the player to truly have the freedom (or the illusion of it) to choose how they want to interact with the characters and fetish content the character has, as long as the OPTIONAL situations makes sense character wise, whats truly the harm in it?

 

[Wrynn13]

Ok this Eve and Brieanne argument is getting ridiculous especially since both sides are essentially saying the same thing. Guys we all hate when specific fethishes we don't like enter our favorite fetish characters story but kinkshaming each other isn't really doing anything.

Now I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate here and your all gonna stone me when I say it but this is a porn game at the end of the day, a porn game where the main appeal is how open ended it gets hence why it has every tag under the planet. I think a character getting more optional content regardless of whenever you like the fetish or not is a truly good thing, keyword OPTIONAL.

Wherever it's a sub route for Evelyn, a ntr path with Brieanne or a monogamous relationship with Cait. I think coc 2 would be at its best if it allowed the player to truly have the freedom (or the illusion of it) to choose how they want to interact with the characters and fetish content the character has, as long as the OPTIONAL situations makes sense character wise, whats truly the harm in it?

*Throws a stone that says YES*

 

[yuzuyo]

Ok this Eve and Brieanne argument is getting ridiculous especially since both sides are essentially saying the same thing.

Not even remotely. The discussion, as Skandranon said, was about how some people here act. Rules for thee and not for me. "Brienne shouldn't get rammed by anyone else because that's out of character, but please, please, change x, I don't like them, appeal to meeeee."

That's what this is about and it runs rampant here because of the circlejerk. The hate-boner is out of control.

If Sera released without her sub route, you'd obviously think that's antithetical to her character right?

You have to purposefully put her in debt and then buy her, basically enslaving her. And she's still not that "subby." I guess you could make a corrupt character do that here, I don't see any other reasonable way.

Well, I'm tired of this shit now, so I'll leave it here.

 

[Alterism]

Excuse me if I'm being dense, this was only very lightly glossed over: Hasn't Sera proven that you can make a sub route to an otherwise dominant character(and have it be their defining trait) and have it work?

I brought her up multiple times

But I still feel like I didn't make good enough points.
The 'point' being that a character losing their monogamous status would potentially be a 'bridge too far' when compared to a dom becoming a sub or gaining sub scenes.

The hill I was previously willing to die on was that you can't compare the asks of one to the other as they're fundamentally different in weight.
e.g; making a route, even if optional that makes Brienne like Cait in regards to sexual promiscuity, would ruffle significantly more feathers than if Evelyn got a sub route. Using evidence of other characters in the past that were dom and became sub as examples of how that's been quite literally proven to be more digestible.

Then it spun off with having to address more minute points like "no that character isn't going to be ruined narratively look at how this other character was able to maintain their core with good enough penmanship" and trying (and failing) to establish the differences in meta appeal.

Edit: Although now that I think on it, I guess I could have shown factual appeal in regards to 'multiple partners' by just bringing up the old patreon polls where group sex and threesomes were consistently some of the lowest voted content consistently.

Though that runs into the issue in that those are like 3 years old at this point and the audience then is in no way indicative of the audience now. Bleh.

 

[Skandranon]

Ok this Eve and Brieanne argument is getting ridiculous especially since both sides are essentially saying the same thing. Guys we all hate when specific fethishes we don't like enter our favorite fetish characters story but kinkshaming each other isn't really doing anything.

Now I'm gonna play Devil's Advocate here and your all gonna stone me when I say it but this is a porn game at the end of the day, a porn game where the main appeal is how open ended it gets hence why it has every tag under the planet. I think a character getting more optional content regardless of whenever you like the fetish or not is a truly good thing, keyword OPTIONAL.

Wherever it's a sub route for Evelyn, a ntr path with Brieanne or a monogamous relationship with Cait. I think coc 2 would be at its best if it allowed the player to truly have the freedom (or the illusion of it) to choose how they want to interact with the characters and fetish content the character has, as long as the OPTIONAL situations makes sense character wise, whats truly the harm in it?

Oh, I'm not opposed to any of those things in principle. I'm up for almost anything. There is, however quite often a LOT of bitching in this thread about certain kinks every time they come up, whether its people complaining about futa, people complaining about NPCxNPC stuff, or people complaining about sub/dom dynamics. SO clearly, not everyone is quite as saintly as I am.

I'm good with most everything when it comes to what kind of stuff makes it into the game.



That being said...there's the issue of time.

Wsan took, what, a year and a half to finish this Brihaus stuff? And mind you, this isn't even the last big hoorah for Brienne - her actual character quest is supposed to concern the cursed armor (and Brint is supposed to have his own equivalent). And then he has to do several more areas in KM still...

Gardeford and Aly took about the same amount of time to work on the valks. Jstar took about a year to do Tetsuya. Savin took like 8 months to do Ryn's quest, and still isn't even done with the follow-up stuff. It's consistently taken around a year for any largish project.

There's already been several things scrapped because backlogs are too big. There comes a point where every time X thing gets added, Y thing stands an increasingly worse making it in, and I'm honestly pretty sure we're well past that point.

Wsan already alluded to that, when he suggested that alternate routes for Eve (or any of his characters) would be the first thing on the chopping block in favor of "primary characterization".
He also keeps doomsaying whether or not he'll ever get to spend the time fleshing out the dryads like he really wants to.


So when it comes to trying to expand a character's appeal outside of that character's original scope...I would simply rather them spend time and effort working with that character expanding on the material that's already there.

 

[sugouxxx]

Brienne pander MC = Good
Evelyn not pander MC = Bad

I treat Evelyn same as Quintilius, ignore their existence
>BUT YOU MISS OUT CONTENT, A DRAGON POWER UP
The dragon power up are not given to me so i don't give a shit

 

[Wrynn13]

Oh no wait I got it. Um well there is only so much chocolate to go around so for every almond joy they make for you fuckers I get less mounds so screw you guys. If only Hersheys took all this money they made selling candy every month and oh I don't know hire some more fucking chocolatiers.

 

[Daken9]

I, for one, also want Garth and his useless kid to be turned into wolfmamas

 

[Wrynn13]

Brienne pander MC = Good
Evelyn not pander MC = Bad

I treat Evelyn same as Quintilius, ignore their existence
>BUT YOU MISS OUT CONTENT, A DRAGON POWER UP
The dragon power up are not given to me so i don't give a shit
View attachment 2913056

I'm still irked my royal scion can't take the Dragon power, but power fantasy bad or something.

 

[Wrynn13]

I, for one, also want Garth and his useless kid to be turned into wolfmamas View attachment 2913062

I can't help feeling Garret would just grab his(her) tits and say "niiiice"

 

[claralover]

bro I just wanna see my pc suck Evelyn's cock, what more is there to it

 

[hu lover]

bro I just wanna see my pc suck Evelyn's cock, what more is there to it

couldn't agree more.