- Dec 13, 2018
- 7,748
- 19,533
No, adding up all the votes in favour of one particular group of answers is exactly how multiple choice voting can work, at least in terms of determining a general consensus out of all the answers. It's similar to when you do a survey of individual customers and one of the answers breaks down like this:I'm not arguing for unavoidable NTR. I'm arguing most people are fine with whatever content/genre so long as its 100% avoidable. Also that's not how multiple choice works when you can answer multiple times buddy. Essentially you could have voted on every single female character option and your counting that as 5 votes instead of 1. Doesn't make sense.
No one ever started sharing content would be unavoidable. MrDots team have said multiple times anything involving D and a male character will be 100% blatantly avoidable. Your again manipulating the numbers to push your narrative, It is actually 555 votes for and 235 against.
Exactly, you just disproved your own argument for adding them together lol. Doesn't make any sense and yes it does matter lol
- Always satisfied = 378
- Often satisfied = 267
- Sometimes satisfied = 98
- Rarely satisfied = 121
- Never satisfied = 427
At the end of day, it's not about the inclusion of the content that's the issue, but that some people seem to think that it should be unduly given more focus when it is content desired by a clear minority.