ramvivat
Engaged Member
- Jun 28, 2022
- 3,565
- 2,101
- 396
I wonder if the author gave Rachel a chance to at least see her daughter, or did he act like she did? in general hypocrisy on the part of the Father is this game of hide and seek. in all honesty, he's no different from Rachel when it comes to hypocrisy. with whom to be - with mother or father - it is up to the daughter to decide, but not to the father. Yes, he has paternal feelings, but his mother also has maternal ones. it is inhumane to deprive both father and mother of communication with their own child. especially if they understand something and are eager to communicate. I think so.
I will ask a question to the general public, who does not consider it possible to forgive someone - and you yourself are still pissing in diapers? So you are the same as you were when you were a child? Or have you changed? so why do you think that Rachel from the endured shock of separation was not able to realize something and draw conclusions?
no, Rachel needs to be given a chance. let them if not live together, then, at least, see the Daughter in the presence of the Father.
By the way, what is the purpose of punishment? not in the correction of vices? mother is punished.
need to see if she made any conclusions.
I will ask a question to the general public, who does not consider it possible to forgive someone - and you yourself are still pissing in diapers? So you are the same as you were when you were a child? Or have you changed? so why do you think that Rachel from the endured shock of separation was not able to realize something and draw conclusions?
no, Rachel needs to be given a chance. let them if not live together, then, at least, see the Daughter in the presence of the Father.
By the way, what is the purpose of punishment? not in the correction of vices? mother is punished.
need to see if she made any conclusions.