Not a lot of time but thank you for your reply. I admit that I don't spend a lot of time reading porn comics, only skimming them for amusement, where and when I can, enjoying their stories and colourful art when I have five or ten minutes to waste and in the mood. I dropped Madness Together because a story involving an underage youth (Arron) being groomed by his pedophile mother (Sarah) and initiated by her into adult sexual activity, prematurely, to his detriment, wasn't to my taste. Now Daniel's rape of his unconscious mother is so utterly repellent to me I've no choice but to drop Immoral Desires, too, despite my huge fondness for the lovely Lana character. I imagine all of us have lines in the sand we simply cannot cross, and, for me, today, this is as far as I can go exploring Daval's world. No harm, no foul. All the best. Over and out.That's not quite what I asked. But if the question is too crass, consider it dropped.
And as I'm sure you know, the name of the complex wasn't named because the behavior exhibited was to a tee a mirror image of Oedipus. You're only arguing nomenclature, now.
Then he is not "sex-obsessed." He's obsessed with physical contact from his mother, and his mother only. That's a notable difference. Every female in the comic, with the exception of Rosa, seems to be attracted to Daniel. But Daniel has only ever expressed interest in Lana even in charged moments with other women, namely Sofia and Martha. Even when Kiara, Sharon's friend, expresses interest in him, he doesn't appear to give it much, if any, attention.
Yes, he's been willing to do anything to carry out his interests, but he's been forthcoming about those interests with Lana. So his lacking a "scrap of honesty" isn't based on anything.
Daniel never got Lana drunk. Lana got drunk on her own at the end of Chapter 9 because she was frustrated with Alex passing out.
Yes, he has done this.
He hasn't assaulted her.
Yes, he has done this, and I admit that's pretty messed up.
Why do you guys keep compelling me to recall this moment? What about the end of Chapter Eight when that stranger tried to "recruit" Lana, subsequently groping her, and Daniel rescued her, shoving that stranger without thinking twice? Seeing as the man was much larger in physique than Daniel was, would his putting himself in harms way be considered "selfless"?
Yes, that's the theme with which Daval proceeded following Chapter 4. I think he believes (I'm only guessing) that their willingness to do anytime or any place is a measure of how intense their love and lust is. The consequences of exposure is intended to provide stakes, and a fallback on which Lana can return when she's not fully invested. The culmination of everything that has gone on is intended to eventually have Lana fully commit.
The consequences are ultimately controlled by Daval. And given his V.I.P. comics, Lana and Daniel's public shenanigans are rather tame. If his V.I.P. characters haven't ended up in jail, I doubt Lana or Daniel will.
The two aren't mutually exclusive. And given this recent update, not to mention, the previous others, I would heavily disagree with Daniel's not feeling a compulsion to have sex with Lana.
Exactly. Because as I have stated before, it's not just the Oedipus complex Daval has broached with Daniel, it's also the male power fantasy. It isn't breaking news that Daniel is trying to dominate and bend Lana to his will. And Lana in her thought bubbles has expressed an attraction to this aspect of Daniel. If Daniel wasn't aggressive and assertive, Lana would probably have done less than 5% of what she has done. Daniel's character traits are necessary to push Lana out of her comfort zone and indulge her IMMORAL DESIRES. Otherwise, she'd have absolutely no incentive to cheat on Alex. (In all honesty, her reasons for cheating on Alex are silly.)
No offense, but I don't think you've assimilated the events of the previous 11 chapters to recount this entire story "in a nutshell." I think you're more focus on shitting on Daniel, for reasons known only to you. There are just a few people in whom I'm confident actually knows the nuances of Immoral Desires' plot. Nevertheless, I'm not here to change your mind, only rebuff the errors in descriptions that are far from accurate.
This is porn comics..about immoral acts horniness and sexual fantasy...i recommend you go and read Dostoevsky or Shakespeare for moral and neat acts..you came wrong firum..this comis are not for soft people..we enjoy these worksNot a lot of time but thank you for your reply. I admit that I don't spend a lot of time reading porn comics, only skimming them for amusement, where and when I can, enjoying their stories and colourful art when I have five or ten minutes to waste and in the mood. I dropped Madness Together because a story involving an underage youth (Arron) being groomed by his pedophile mother (Sarah) and initiated by her into adult sexual activity, prematurely, to his detriment, wasn't to my taste. Now Daniel's rape of his unconscious mother is so utterly repellent to me I've no choice but to drop Immoral Desires, too, despite my huge fondness for the lovely Lana character. I imagine all of us have lines in the sand we simply cannot cross, and, for me, today, this is as far as I can go exploring Daval's world. No harm, no foul. All the best. Over and out.![]()
I'm not a fan of this argument, either. That is, "because it's a comic..." I would assume most of us are invested in these comics for more than just the character designs. We're reading simulated sexual acts of human beings, albeit through 3D renders. And how these characters act influences a reader's ability to attach themselves to the narrative. That's how they stay engaged. Just because it's a comic, it doesn't mean one can't get offended by some of the themes broached in it. Heck, a few months back, I got upset because Daniel called Lana a bitch. So I can only imagine how upset one could get if a beloved character does something they consider heinous. That's the reason I stated that I wasn't trying to invalidate anyone's feelings. I'm more so trying to challenge the consistency of the positions on which they've expressed those feelings.Irony is reading incest comics and consider morality on a rape. It's a comic and both are wrong .You can't be ok with incest and condem rape.
This is truly an underrated comment. My hat's off to you, sir. Lana's stating this should speak to the issue of "consent." Here, I've compiled a few pages where Lana acknowledges that she told Daniel that he "owns" her body, and how she feels about it:Btw lana said daniel owns her body so he can use whenever he want.
I appreciate the honesty.Not a lot of time but thank you for your reply. I admit that I don't spend a lot of time reading porn comics, only skimming them for amusement, where and when I can, enjoying their stories and colourful art when I have five or ten minutes to waste and in the mood.
Aaron doesn't look much younger than David does. All the characters are technically 18 and over, but I suspect this disclaimer is just legal protection from portraying "near-shota" content. But again, I'd have to disagree with your descriptions. Sarah groomed Aaron no more than she groomed David, and she really went after David. If you weren't offended by the first three chapters, then it's beyond me to understand why these last two chapters were the straw that broke the camel's back.I dropped Madness Together because a story involving an underage youth (Arron) being groomed by his pedophile mother (Sarah) and initiated by her into adult sexual activity, prematurely, to his detriment, wasn't to my taste.
Is there no room for nuance? Especially since we have yet to determine Lana's reaction?Now Daniel's rape of his unconscious mother is so utterly repellent to me I've no choice but to drop Immoral Desires, too, despite my huge fondness for the lovely Lana character.
I can respect this. (And I agree with the principle, even though I disagree where it's being applied.) Sorry to see you go.I imagine all of us have lines in the sand we simply cannot cross, and, for me, today, this is as far as I can go exploring Daval's world. No harm, no foul. All the best. Over and out.![]()
After this out of nowhere unwanted retarded ass fiasco Daval should focus on those females you mentioned (Rose too shame everyone forgets about her even you lol) with spinoffs not involving Daniel or Lana.All disagreements aside, we all have our likes and dislikes or complete no-nos with Daval's porn comics, ID and MT, specifically, cuz of our personal tastes and pereferences, fact is, nobody can deny the man knows his stuff and does a fantASStic job with those female characters of his, all of them. Just look at Lana's majesticYou must be registered to see the linksin this render. Hoooly shiiieett, girl.
Can't say I blame D for not ever wanting to pull his dick out of her pussy, except for the occasional necessary 'breaks'... that thing is the definition of perfection.Lucky ass motherfucker. It'd be nice if Sofia, Sharon, Kiara and Martha got a piece of his magical MC dick too for a change tho. Kinda feels like they're in the story just for comic relief and some extra eye candy after so many chapters with no action with the MC.
I agree with you should condem both, My point is just I disagree with the concept that having sex with someone unconscious is not rape. Of course is just a comic I respect all opinions. You can read about BDSM and condemn that practice or whatsoever.Irony is reading incest comics and consider morality on a rape. It's a comic and both are wrong .You can't be ok with incest and condem rape. Btw lana said daniel owns her body so he can use whenever he want.
Virtually every modern legal system defines sexual activity with an unconscious person as rape, regardless of the relationship between the individuals involved. Consent must be conscious, informed, and ongoing. The last one means that even if someone gives prior authorization, they can revoke it at any time. None of this is possible when a person is asleep or otherwise unconscious. Even within a marriage, such an act is legally considered rape. Therefore, regardless of your opinion, the facts define the act as what it is: rape.I agree with you should condem both, My point is just I disagree with the concept that having sex with someone unconscious is not rape. Of course is just a comic I respect all opinions. You can read about BDSM and condemn that practice or whatsoever.
Hence the term must be qualified using the modifier, "legally." It adds nothing more to an argument than a statement like, "The Emir of Qatar has declared that my touching a female's hand is considered sexual assault." Can we really state as a people that arbitrary statutes should take precedence over the preferences of the involved parties? There's no context in which this can be considered other than opinion. And the only opinions that matter are Daval's, expressed through his characters. That is, if Lana has allowed her son to impose on her personal space and has affirmed his discretion to do this at will, then that's all that matters. If you want to state, "in my country, that's considered rape..." you're more than welcome to. That however is not even as remotely as important as what Lana, and by proxy Daval, considers it.Virtually every modern legal system defines sexual activity with an unconscious person as rape, regardless of the relationship between the individuals involved. Consent must be conscious, informed, and ongoing. The last one means that even if someone gives prior authorization, they can revoke it at any time. None of this is possible when a person is asleep or otherwise unconscious. Even within a marriage, such an act is legally considered rape. Therefore, regardless of your opinion, the facts define the act as what it is: rape.
But then again, as far as we know, he is possibly underage (hinted) and her son (obvious), which implies multiple forms of rape already, including statutory rape, incestuous rape, and rape of a minor. All charges to be served to his mother.
NODoes anyone have Immoral Desire 11 in Spanish please?
Can you please upload the ID 11 alone, I have the rest and it feels like a waste to download 3Gb for just one chapter.EDIT:ID 1 - 11 (Original resolution, English) new link:You must be registered to see the links
EDIT (5:48PM EST): Realized I forgot to add chapter 9. Uploading fixed version now.
EDIT (6:50PM EST): Sorry it took so long. Gofile was weird and a sweaty Jin ki charged me.
Final update, all chapters, original resolution (3200 x 2200), all in English. They're all in one folder, and all in order (obviously) to make it easier to read. If there's a problem, let me know.You must be registered to see the links
I agree the scene is not looking appealing and necessary and it's not the first time he did that without her consent. If you look closely all incest comics will have same trait. It will be without consent as its Taboo and mom will not willingly participate in sex in the beginning in all the incest comics as they will show some restraint. Finaly the comic name is IMmoral desire and looking for morality in it is pointless. It's like we are searching diamonds in a sewage.I agree with you should condem both, My point is just I disagree with the concept that having sex with someone unconscious is not rape. Of course is just a comic I respect all opinions. You can read about BDSM and condemn that practice or whatsoever.