For some reason I'm not allowed write reviews yet but I would love to write one for this game it's a great game with a great dev and it's massively underrated.
Unless this has changed since 2017 or you have been reported for violating review guidelines, you should be able to review without any post, if I remember correctly.
Ah, forgot this part, thanks.
It looks like best playable character needs to be reminded of how fucked up mankind is in the first place...
But that doesn't mean I forgive Mary. I'd still happily drain away all of her darkness as Llavanya, then turn her into a dog and have her dog hump her in her realm forever while I take care of all of my former female partners.
Most of the reviews are 4 stars. A couple lower a few higher. Obviously unlike a video I watched on scoring the BTS Meal, math doesn't average a 5 star and a 1 star as a 4 star. I do think rating systems should take the mode as opposed to the mean, but here we are.
Ratings are subjective and mostly meaningless on just about every site.
As for reviews, they have to be objective, constructive and remain
consistent with development updates for ongoing or unfinished projects. Some reviews are updated by the reviewer themselves to prevent player confusion, but don't count on it. The date is here as a hint if the version was omitted. A proper review from 2 years ago may no longer be relevant for games in active development if developers completely lost track of their initial roadmap if they had any to begin with.
Review guidelines specifically explain why being objective and reminding of the version you are reviewing is important. The star rating is useless for non-complete projects as the visible star rating does not properly reflect the game evolution or regression, but this is something you can keep for the site feedback section if you want to add another thread to the heap.