That's a rather interesting take, even if the update comes in 5 years (hey even I am optimistic sometimes), he could always say: "only a few days late, sorry guys!".It's 2 years late. Stop posting this "few days late" bullshit that he wants you to parrot here.
I did not realize that just like his patrons BlueCat was also a gold level mental gymnast. He must be getting high on his followers supply of copium or something, there is no other way to justify this. I mean even looking at his terms it is "weeks" away because 3-20 days includes a time range greater than two weeks. I gave up on this game a while ago and am just here for the shitposting
To be fair, plural literally just means more than one.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
But he said it's a matter of days not weeks not months.To be fair, plural literally just means more than one.
Bluecat was pretty on the nose here.
So if it takes 10 weeks, that's still weeks.
technically, 33 days is still days.But he said it's a matter of days not weeks not months.
Which, if you're being a hardass means that anything over 7 days is going over his own deadline.
Even if you were super lenient and relaxed about it(because why wouldn't you be after one and a half years of missed deadlines), anything over two weeks is breaking your word.
Lol Sounds like if Bluecat came to a sudden stop, your nose would go halfway up his ass.....technically, 33 days is still days.
When someone says days away that means it is close, not weeks, and certainly not months that is why one can also state something is weeks away or months away from happening. If you use the term days people expect it in that context. Not in weeks and definitely not in months.technically, 33 days is still days.
Only if there's no further qualifiers, such as "not weeks, not months". Adding said qualifiers means that the timeline is no longer open-ended.technically, 33 days is still days.
To be fair, plural literally just means more than one.
Bluecat was pretty on the nose here.
So if it takes 10 weeks, that's still weeks.
Did you miss the full context? First BC saidtechnically, 33 days is still days.
You can't say that and reasonably expect people to interpret it as "any conceivable number of days". If I were to put numbers to that, I'd say 13 days or less (ie. less than 2 weeks). Of course, this is BC so I know better than to try to get anything concrete from an ambiguous statement.next update will be released as soon as possible
we're talking about days, not weeks, not months, just days.
So apparently two weeks is not weeks."weeks" means more than two weeks.
So apparently two weeks + 6 days (ie 20 days) is not more than two weeks!so the time range is about 3 days to 20 days.
exactly if he would not come off as so arrogant he would probably be less criticized or in the very least people would not jump at any opportunity to criticize him or laugh at his "logic"Did you miss the full context? First BC said
You can't say that and reasonably expect people to interpret it as "any conceivable number of days". If I were to put numbers to that, I'd say 13 days or less (ie. less than 2 weeks). Of course, this is BC so I know better than to try to get anything concrete from an ambiguous statement.
And naturally BC went somewhere no-one could have predicted, and said that:
So apparently two weeks is not weeks.
So apparently two weeks + 6 days (ie 20 days) is not more than two weeks!
And it's not even really his tortured logic that gets me, but rather the arrogance of acting like it should be universally accepted and understood.
You just can't make this shit up.
You're correct, but that's literally just semantics. On the other hand we would say '0.1 week' and 'a half week' but 'two quarter weeks' (if those quantities made any sense).I'm not a native speaker ... but technically, 1 day is 0.14 weeks, right?
Well, given BC doesn't use "our" timezones (and uses catzone) maybe he is using his cat math to come up with his 3-20 days? Plus, maybe it's his cat MTL translating his posts in the attempt to convey what he means.Did you miss the full context? First BC said
You can't say that and reasonably expect people to interpret it as "any conceivable number of days". If I were to put numbers to that, I'd say 13 days or less (ie. less than 2 weeks). Of course, this is BC so I know better than to try to get anything concrete from an ambiguous statement.
And naturally BC went somewhere no-one could have predicted, and said that:
So apparently two weeks is not weeks.
So apparently two weeks + 6 days (ie 20 days) is not more than two weeks!
And it's not even really his tortured logic that gets me, but rather the arrogance of acting like it should be universally accepted and understood.
You just can't make this shit up.