No. You are wrong. If you read the message, it says "some of the most important foundational elements of the merge is delayed". If some is delayed than some other elements are being worked on. Development has not stopped. Crucial for the merge or not is irrelevant, because some other work for the project is being done. You interpret it wrong and try to sell your wrong interpretation of Blues statement as "obvious fact".'With the obligatory caveat that I'm only a Patron/member of the Discord server and have no affiliation with the project or team, I can confirm that work on elements of the game is occurring on a daily basis, however due to the illness of one of the most senior team members, work some of the most important foundational elements of the merge is delayed.'
So basically, you can word it as 'delayed' and admit that it can't be completed, but you think because blue didn't say the words 'on hold' because he'd lose revenue, that you can argue with anyone who can see the obvious fact that it is on hold. It was delayed, which was ongoing, and is still ongoing
Of course everybody can say anything they want, but if anybodies opinion, or point of view is in direct contradiction to the rules which are written down, it could be argued that those individuals do not care, maybe don't understand, or can't accept the definitions of said rules, policy, etc. Obvious to them or not doesn't make an opinion a fact.And here's a spoiler alert, nobody cares about the textbook definition of on hold. They're entitled to say the obvious. Which it is
Any rule, policy, regulation, law follows its own textbook definition, otherwise it would only be a suggestion. That is logical. The definition for the tag On Hold is written down. You can argue the definition in the rules thread, but as it stands right now the game does not fall under the definition of being On Hold.
And - Don't say "nobody cares", you speak only for yourself.
Release of a game update is not mandatory for the developing process to proceed. Never was, never will be. A release is only mandatory to finish a project. Whatever that might be. Book, Movie, Song, or in this case a game. Promises made, Promises broken (for whatever reason) and still has no influence receive the on hold tag. Skummy said on hold, but he is not the dev.And then this:
'Release is currently on hold due to staff illness, this dev team member is irreplaceable, so until they're back to 100% we're gonna stay frozen on everything. I will be sure to let you all know whatever is going on, until then its just a bit of a fuzzy timeline.'
This was from Skummy back in February 4 months ago, the game was on hold, it remains on hold. Otherwise, where the feck is it?
There is no hiding behind definitions. There is understanding of the definitions, which I and others communicate to users who don't know them. The delusion is on you as you don't want to accept it. And the longer you keep on telling that the game is on hold when it is not, you are the liar and you are the troll. I don't tell lies or the truth, I am telling you the game is not on hold as it doesn't fall in the category - Dev said it's on hold - which is the basis for this tag.You can manipulate the wording to 'delayed' in later posts so it doesn't gat tagged, but it couldn't be clearer what other perfectly, impeccably, flawlessly defined term the game falls under 'on hold'
And I don't really care if you want to delude yourselves by hiding behind definitions. But when you tell those lies as if they are the truth to other people and make out they are the ones lying and simply deciding to troll, it's no good. A definition should not drain someone of logic
If he wants to lie to his patrons, so be it. That doesn't impact me anymore
Last edited: