I'm sure you can afford 8$ to support the developer as you own a computer that is able to run this game, right? But the question is, do you want to spend 8$ to support the developer? I think not, but that's why we are both here right?
You can run this game with a 400$ PC or less. The VR headset alone is over 1000$ plus it required a high end PC to use VR. My point is if a person can afford all that then they should have just pay a few buck to support the developer. I'm here because I'm poor and broke at the time. I will gladly to support this game if I have the money.
speak for yourself, i spent 3 years where i cut food expenses so that i could afford all that, doesn't mean that i have more money to throw away willy nilly...
Can any kind soul provide a pic of her with muscle volume at 10, I'm too lazy to change the value right now.
I do not believe it's an unspoken rule or anything though, so calling it a "mistake" is pretty asinine
Could you tell us how to access the content via CE?Hope the rebuild is going well funog1, sucks to hear that
Tested the cracked 0.24 version. The scene they removed from Erika x Hound is still not back in the game, and now one of the Dreamer x Alet scenes is also removed. You can still access them with cheat engine but the moaning is broken (Probably because it's a different voice set for Alet in that scene).
Heck, a lot of the girl's moaning/climax sounds are broken or the timings are off. And Erika's model has seam issues... no wonder the devs released this on April first instead of a day earlier
Not a rule in the sense that everyone has to do it, even if they have the knowledge to crack the game, but it's done out of respect for the dev ever since Bupo cracked the game before Funog.
Honestly I agree with seagoat on the word usage. It kind of sounds like you're shaming JAGE for not thinking the same way as you do. Even if it's not intentional, it does pressure him to agree with you. Same goes for implying that he should with the "has". (This applies to all of the other similar responses from others.)
If that's the way you choose to interpret my post... I'm in no way shaming someone for sharing the crack here. I was just explaining to seagoat why the cracks have not been released asap since they've been a thing. And didn't I precisely say that he does not have to follow that "rule" in my post? Strange that you think I said the exact opposite with that sentence.
You didn't emphasise the right word then. Read it with only "has" being highlighted then with only "not" being highlighted, it has different connotations.
Sure, but I recommend getting version 0.23 instead.
Guess it got lost in translation then. Putting emphasis on "has" makes sense to me, and I don't see how doing that changes the meaning of the sentence into the opposite. But that's what you get with purely written communication.
This is quite disappointing. I wish it was like in Fallen Doll, where there is a clear difference between 0 and 1.
