I suggest using average standard rather then extreme possibility. Can 18 year look like that ? Sure can because the genetic variance is huge. There is the whole fucking barely legal baby face shit after all. But they are not popular because they look like adult woman, they are popular because they are adults that look underage.
Doubling down on your original statement only confirms what the others replied.
Not the point in discussion.
And what exactly makes you think that the target market for this product is the average western person that actually goes outside?
She isn’t meant to look like an average 18, oh boy no surprise my “is she of age” sensor based on “average 18 look” is triggered. My standard only limits what I’m comfortable looking at. Even if you show me ID proving someones adult age, if they look underage I will not be comfortable looking at them having sex.
This is the standard of age I have, saying it is not made for such people doesn’t help your argument about being adult looking. And harms the one were you accused me of having skewed perception, self inspection time for you ?And what exactly makes you think that the target market for this product is the average western person that actually goes outside?
Again, if explicit content of non-voluptuous adult females makes you uncomfortable, that's an inner issue of you.
I didn't even discuss her face since that's the most widely faked feature since ancient times. Surely you are familiar with cosplayers applying tons of makeup to appear younger and with big eyes. Asians are exceptionally good at it. And why would she have some famous people's face just so one or two people aren't triggered? They will find something else to complain about. As a matter of fact, that would bring another set of issues. Absolute nonsense.
Nobody's trying to convince you of anything other than the new Gelato being able to pass as a young adult, something your inner issues don't let you accept. We aren't playing devil's advocate here, she is meant to look young. The whole Steam thing might as well be completely made up, but suppossing they did greenlit the current model, that backs up our point as well.
Your standards are your prerrogative, just don't try to bring them as universally valid because they clearly aren't. Had you said that Gelato was not to your liking would have been perfectly understandable; trying to put you as morally above people that like her because of some absolutely subjective considerations is where you failed. At this point I can safely assume Marie Rose makes you vomit?
If you can't tell a difference between non-voluptuous and underage looking what there is to say.
Oh that is totally what i said, that i want her to have famous people face. gtfo
I'm bored of this weaseling out. I really don't care how you defend her or if you think I'm trying to be morally above people. I will repeat from my first post : "I feel uncomfortable looking at her and I don't want to be forced into lobby where she is undressed let alone having sex."Nobody's trying to convince you of anything other than the new Gelato being able to pass as a young adult, something your inner issues don't let you accept. We aren't playing devil's advocate here, she is meant to look young. The whole Steam thing might as well be completely made up, but suppossing they did greenlit the current model, that backs up our point as well.
For real, tho; look again at the preview... She's got that waist to hip ratio, long legs, and meat where a sexually mature female usually has. Except it's not exaggerated like every other model.
Your standards are your prerrogative, just don't try to bring them as universally valid because they clearly aren't. Had you said that Gelato was not to your liking would have been perfectly understandable; trying to put you as morally above people that like her because of some absolutely subjective considerations is where you failed. At this point I can safely assume Marie Rose makes you vomit?
Tripling down on your fuss because of some petite female cries for real self inspection. Surely I also have matters where I need to improve myself, but other people's preferences and paraphillias certainly are not of my concern. As long as they keep to themselves and do no harm, it's perfectly inconsequential for me.
Even if a new version of the "game" somehow gets cracked, the "game" itself is still an animation viewer.
You did try to be morally above people when you made that toddler comparison.
If I can help you, lad don't waste your money on this game.
I even went out of my way explaining why and how she can pass as a young adult. I study art so I'm well aware of body types, ages, proportions, canons etc.
Your words, I went with this hypotetical case, and how it would create even more issues.
Apparently, providing sound arguments that you can't counter with anything else than a "no" is weaseling out?
Yeah, we already know other people's preferences bother you. We simply pointed how it's a completely subjective issue, to which your better arguments have been "no" "no u" "gtfo" "weaseling" "it's my opinion". Throwing a fit (at me of all people) won't help your case at all.
Things like people automatically expecting an updated, cracked version and not using the search bar are what make it hilarious indeed.
I've a better offer for you : interested in buying Meth ? Higher return on investment ngl
It's is funny how you cut out context out my quotes to fit your needs.
I'm still looking where in my sentence I'm bothered by other's people preferences.
Sound arguments? You mean misrepresentation of my arguments and then claiming "It's you issue"?
I've been stating from my first reply that other people's preferred tags don't concern me. You're so mad you aren't even reading properly.
I have presented reasoning why I made my statement - game forces us into shared space. I did not stumble on kink that I'm uncomfortable with, it is being brought in into product i enjoyed. Sure i could give up on the game but I've invested in it so I will try at least to have influence on it when it matters for me. Call it being triggered, mad , taking high moral ground whatever you like.I've been stating from my first reply that other people's preferred tags don't concern me. You're so mad you aren't even reading properly.
And we aren't trying to convince you since you got your reasons, rational or not. We merely presented a counter-argument and backed it with a pinch of logical reasoning.
Does it bother you? your problem, but hardly a valid critique against Scamlius.
So far, since you couldn't rebuke the counter argument, you've moved into framing me as the one with issues, when two other guys before me told you to go touch grass lol.
You know, I had a friend just like you. They simply can't accept they were wrong. But it's ok, please allow me to properly step up the moral pedestal this time and let you know that we are forgiving and understanding
When I said "You can't convince me" it was good place to stop if you had no issue with my pov.
Nice try, but the game has a mechanic for hiding specific players (or all) in the lobby
