Deleted member 396172
Engaged Member
- Jan 23, 2018
- 2,575
- 5,594
Roughly 700 renders in so far. Not rushing ch2 by any means, but if all goes well... Maybe the end of the month on Steam. Maybe.Any news guys for the coming update?
Not trying to be an ass constantly asking about an update but...update when? You were hopeful about getting the update done over a month ago now so I'm just wondering where you are with it.Roughly 700 renders in so far. Not rushing ch2 by any means, but if all goes well... Maybe the end of the month on Steam. Maybe.
prove itIt's not
Easy, go be part of his Patreon and you'll get updates. Instead of freeloading here and making statements based on your own stats, that you probably pulled out your own anus.prove it
Either or, comes down to simple fact it's someone who doesn't support the person, thus has 0 access to any information and just pulls shit out their ass and claim that it's facts. Typical humans these days.Except on his Patreon there has been no post since this summer. You meant his Discord, maybe?
someone who doesn't support the person, thus has 0 access to any information and just pulls shit out their ass and claim that it's facts. Typical humans these days.
[/QUOTI'l
l'm going to trust your word on this, then, as you seem an expert on the topic![]()
I don't have to prove anything. If you want to know if a dev is active or what the status of his game(s) are, just check his discord. And for the record, yes I am a patron of his, and have access to his discord where he frequently posts about his progress with his games, including this one.prove it
He is correct. As many of you who have followed the progress of CH2 closely (on discord) know, I don't work on this alone. Arima (above) and I, work with another coder who had end-of-the-year exams, and the planned December release of CH2 was pushed until we are done with it. So, January is "update when". Also, I personally work only on FOM while overseeing THE SHRiNK. This allows me to focus on FOM. However, creating scenes from scratch with so many characters involved does take a lot of time.It's not
If there's one thing we can rely on you for, it's hot redheads, isn't it? Though IMO this one would be better if it were not quite so dark.He is correct. As many of you who have followed the progress of CH2 closely (on discord) know, I don't work on this alone. Arima (above) and I, work with another coder who had end-of-the-year exams, and the planned December release of CH2 was pushed until we are done with it. So, January is "update when". Also, I personally work only on FOM while overseeing THE SHRiNK. This allows me to focus on FOM. However, creating scenes from scratch with so many characters involved does take a lot of time.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Brighter indeed. But those fires look a little pale. There is a reason I stick to a certain brightness limit.If there's one thing we can rely on you for, it's hot redheads, isn't it? Though IMO this one would be better if it were not quite so dark.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
It's called "overexposure". As you increase the exposure of an image, the highlights tend towards white regardless of the chroma of the image. Having the exposure set for the highlight outliers rather than the main subject of the image is the problem. That makes the rest of the image underexposed and it is not making a good image. We can see the same in picture from The Shrink:Brighter indeed. But those fires look a little pale. There is a reason I stick to a certain brightness limit.
My image was not edited at all. I was just saying that brighter, is not always better. Especially when it is meant to be nighttime. I am going to edit them when the time comes as much as they do not lose their intended purpose.It's called "overexposure". As you increase the exposure of an image, the highlights tend towards white regardless of the chroma of the image. Having the exposure set for the highlight outliers rather than the main subject of the image is the problem. That makes the rest of the image underexposed and it is not making a good image. We can see the same in the picture from The Shrink:
View attachment 2274320 View attachment 2274321
The exposure is set for the bright lights, leaving the rest of the image underexposed. Making dark images too dark is a real weakness of yours and I wish you could see that.