I'm going to pin you down on that comment a bit; Weren't you the one, that was adamant on the stance, that the choice of becoming a full-time slave should be between the Sub and Domme and anything is fair game when it is handled, understood and agreed upon by both sides beforehand?
Where's that sudden shift coming from? When your mistress wants you to get banged by another guy you suddenly forget your place? Whatever your mistress says, goes, does it not?
Back to topic:
I feel both your and the more open perspective of dominance are valid. Though, I have to confess I'm also far more leaning towards the idea that a female in power itself is an act of dominance, regardless whether that involves a third, fourth or fifth participant of any gender.
My Gretchenfrage thus:
If a game, which by all accounts you find truly worthy of the title femdom according to your definition for a certain percentage of its entirety, but the rest of it is that despicable forced-bi you detest, that in some form removes the impeccable feminine symbol from its pedestal of pure human perfection in form, mind and beauty, where do you draw the line that this game is no longer deemed acceptable for this list? 75 to 25? 50 to 50? 25 to 75?
A findom example:
Is your mistress training you to become a source of money too much? Is it too much when she actively takes so much from you, that you're forced to go into male prostitution? Does she have to actively force you to become the bottom for other males that makes this scenario no longer femdom according to your definition?
If any of these fail to meet your accepted standard; what sort of money income is permissive for this findom to still be accepted by your definition? Or is findom in itself not an allowed form of femdom according to your perspective?
I primarily ask these things since I can live with the list sticking to your explicit definition just fine. But I would like its rules to be applied consistently to all entries that may be allowed to adorn it.