It's mostly negative reaction... if that's your cup of tea then good job.Also, I can't comment back about the future more than saying "you have to wait and see," obviously, because any more would spoil what you'll see in game. I do like the discussions about the personality of these girls I'm writing, I don't see this level of discussion on some games here, so at the very least I think I'm doing something right if it's getting everyone talking this much.
I have always been a serial defender of the creative freedom of the game developers and writers, even when I personally don't happen to like some parts of their creations. Even when no one else dared to be the first to step up for them and their freedom in their game threads.
Not in my experience.
Assuming Alice is your important stuff, then you are wrong, as it stands at the moment Leah is your direct competitor for her, more than that even, she is an obstacle to be overcome.
It seems to me, as with all things in life, everyone's experience is different. My view of what it's like seems to be very different to yours yet mine is very real and unless I was to disrespect you I have to assume that you are not lying and your experience is real.
i hope this will be the new norm for your game moving forward. if you have the player choosing between a pacifist/sub route and a pervert/dom route, it is already expected to have 2 completely different path to play with the MC showing different behavior and having different dialogues with the other characters.
You edited your post and change it bravo
You want more ? I can do this all day. Do you have to insult while you're defending(!)?
Thank you for listening to fans
Glad to hear that you take seriously what I believe has been constructive criticism with regards to the last update. While I'm not a fan of NTR content in games I understand that sometimes there is a place for it. All we ask is to be given the choice to shape our playing experience and avoid such content. I will admit I do still have my concerns going forward that your writer may not fully consider what sort of content they are putting into the game and how it will effect peoples experiences playing it. Obviously we will see what the future holds. Believe me when I say this, we are only getting so annoyed by this because we enjoy the game and care about what happens in it. So you are definitely doing something right
good luck with this. i personally think you should just tell the story you're trying to tell - let the game speak for itself once it is done. There will be people that like it and people that don't, but you can't write something for everyone. You write what you think is going to be great and let the people decide once they have seen it all.
Thank you both. As I have stated before I think both you and V.A. are great at what you do. I believe by doing this you will take a good game and make it truly great. I once again want to say thank you for your concern and for listening to the opinions of your players.
$ pacifism =+ 1Thanks for discovering a bug and notifying me. However it is not due to "=+" since it can be inverse and it'll still work. Doing "=+" is just a matter of preference. Most programmer use "+=", and I usually do it, but sometimes I'm a bit inconsistent and use "=+" instead.
It works, but they're not the same thing.
No. "+= 1" will add 1 to the actual value, but "=+ 1" will assign the positive value 1. So in one way you'll increase "pacifist", and on the other you'll reset it's value.
Welp my bad, I rarely use "=+" (since most of the time it's just a typo) and I only really use it to go from 0 to 1 so it has always worked for me haha. Thanks for correcting me (Y).
