You mean that drinking more breer, being stronger, more sexually agressive and endowed, crass and rude... These are not all feminine traits?
No hate tho, I'm okay with it. I'm also okay with someone doing something more grounded in reality too.
Recommending FUTA ON MALE content collection(list)
- Thread starter Choo-choo
- Start date
No hate tho, I'm okay with it. I'm also okay with someone doing something more grounded in reality too.
- Aug 8, 2017
- 783
- 1,892
- Dec 24, 2020
- 488
- 1,248
You're sort of right. What I'm talking about is more of their role in the dynamic. It's all hammer and nail stuff without any real variation of how the futa and MC get together. A little seduction goes a long way, and does a sort of feminine flirtiness that is absent in quite a bit of futa stuff.
I get you. Tho I was being over the top sarcastic to amplify your point. I suppose it really doesn't translate in text.
Anyway, yeah I totally agree. I guess it is just easier to draw a boner than it is to write a compelling story.
- Dec 24, 2020
- 488
- 1,248
I got the sarcasm, but it was also right unironically.A lot of typical "masculine" behavior gets swapped onto futas to make them fufil a sort of dominant one dimensional role (similar to an Amazon). Even if the story isn't super compelling, its nice if the characters have some variance.
- Sep 25, 2020
- 244
- 720
I am actually triggered. As if there has ever been any piece of porn produced in which the woman wasn't depicted as overly feminine. What is happening here???
- Dec 24, 2020
- 488
- 1,248
Nuance. Being feminine means more than just having honkadonkas and masculinity means more than just having a doodle. I simply feel futa leans super hard into the masculine tropes for futa characters.
- Jun 19, 2019
- 9,074
- 33,977
(C) Trapitalism 2023
- Jul 19, 2017
- 392
- 285
I think Inner Growth is a decent example. The MC futa acts just like a typical male mc imo. They basically wrote a male character and made them futa just because. It's the reason I don't like that game.
- Sep 25, 2020
- 244
- 720
I don't have the self-restraint for this. It is too ironic to see dudes who like girldick bemoan the lack of gender conformity.
Well my advice to you is to not to be triggered.
Trapitalism101 is only expressing what they would like to see. It's not an attack on you or your tastes.
I dislike girl dicks. To me all dicks are male. That way you don't have to bunch me up with whatever label you have on your head that disavows people who like "girldick" from having additional tastes.
Anyway tho, you're getting upset because we're taking about how much sugar we like on our tea because tea is mostly water or something... The analogy gets away from me, but the point remains.
Nobody isn't forcing it on you. Chill out. Have a chat. Maybe tell us why you find this so triggering?
- Jul 19, 2017
- 392
- 285
So just because someone likes a certain thing that you don't like, it's okay for the least amount of effort to be put into that thing?
So no one is allowed to complain about anything according to you?
Such a shallow view.
- Jun 19, 2019
- 9,074
- 33,977
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Jan 26, 2021
- 6,889
- 21,599
That's not even a meme...
Vegeta 100% had proper education. He is a prince after all.
- Jul 9, 2020
- 835
- 794
Doesn't really bother me. Although, I suppose some variety would have been nice in this regard.
- May 4, 2020
- 1,075
- 1,447
Well, it is true that some people would consider more assertive or dominant traits as "masculine", while viewing more docile or submissive behavior as "feminine". I do not adhere to such views, however; those ideas are essentially social constructs created by patriarchal society and have very little basis in biology, IMHO. Personally, I have always been attracted to assertive/dominant women (whether cis females, trans women or futanari), while docile/submissive women never held any sexual appeal to me.
Last edited:
- May 4, 2020
- 1,075
- 1,447
This may be true for many species of mammals (although there are quite a few exceptions, including our close relatives – the bonobos). But if we look at the animal kingdom beyond mammalian species, there is by no means any specific pattern; we shall observe that dominance of either sex or egalitarian relations are more or less equally common.
- May 4, 2020
- 1,075
- 1,447
Lions and wolves are pretty much irrelevant for this discussion (besides, both are actually much less "patriarchal" than generally perceived). I would argue that humans are more closely related to bonobos than to common chimps (regarding the latter, while they might indeed be considered "patriarchal", describing them as "strongly patriarchal" would probably be a bit of an overstatement), but citing all the facts to support my theory would probably go way beyond the topic of this thread. I could also cite some archeological, anthropological and ethnographic evidence proving that humans are not inherently patriarchal and that matriarchal and egalitarian societies have existed in the past (and still exist in some isolated populations), but that would probably be, again, TDLR and way off-topic.But we are talking about mammals here though. My point still stands with bonobos though, they're a matriarchal society (one sex is still more 'dominant' than the other), hyenas are also matriarchal (the females literally have a pseudo penis, and are bigger and stronger, but they give birth out of them, ouch!). Other than that, humans, chimps, lions, wolves etc. all strongly patriarchal. With the males possessing the markers of dominance in nature (physical strength and size).
Last edited:
- May 4, 2020
- 1,075
- 1,447
Well, there were certainly objective reasons why patriarchal societies have become more successful at some point in human history: since men are, in general, physically stronger than women, they tend to be naturally better at crude warfare and metalworking, which became the most lucrative occupations from the late Bronze Age well into the 20th century. But, this no longer stands true, and recent studies show that women are generally better than men in virtually all professions where raw physical strength is not a crucial factor. So, again, there is a pretty objective reason why the tables should be turning now.Yeah there have been isolated pockets of matriarchies that have existed throughout human history. If we try to visualize it on like a timeline of humanity, they would appear like occassional blips that appear and quickly disappear, surrounded by the ever present, all conquering, patriarchy
Last edited: