- Aug 31, 2021
- 79
- 266
I honestly doubt anybody would be able to do that. If you were thinking of something like an infographic video or something in that vein.Sounds a-okay to me, in a sense, because this is how I see it: that "average joe" paid for a game - not "development time", not "a nice developer" - "a game". Plus, some haters consider it their mission to drag people like that into the whole mess, with rabid fanaticism and a "if you are not with us - you are against us" mindset. The poor fellow simply wants to play the game and just get whatever from doing so, be it enjoying a platformer or waxing his carrot.
At some point, the thought actually did cross my mind, about the likelihood of somebody gone through the, shall we say, "development process" of FF being capable of reviewing it fairly, i.e., "as a game in isolation", as the post you quoted put it. Fingers crossed.
HW has gotten so much information scrubbed over the years, that trying to make any sort of in-depth dive from an outside view is next to impossible. The entire original ULMF thread being deleted, comments, reviews, statements, all scrubbed by HW's pestering of mod teams. Though I don't know if he did the same things on ULMF as he did on f95 when it came to comments and reviews, somebody more informed would have to clarify on that.
And that creates a catch 22. Because the only people who'd be able to know about the scrubbed information would've had to have been there from the start, 10 years ago, when HW first showed FF to the world. And the only people who'd fit that criteria are either going to be rabid fanatics of FF and HW, or disillusioned critics. So a "truly" objective view after witnessing the entire development process would be impossible, since the only people who know everything are either willing to completely dismiss any errors made on HW's part, or people who've grown a personal dislike for him because of his conduct.
The closest we have to "true" objective reviews of the game are from the critics, since the fanatics are 5 star reviewing the game with asinine reasons. I remember the first reviews coming out just after the game launched, and a lot of them were way more in-depth than I could've imagined, but I can't seem to find them anymore. And those reviews covered almost every part of the game and cross-examined those parts with other comparable platformers.
I couldn't make an objective review, and I've only been keeping up with the game for a few months lmao.