Start your own blog or something. We don't care what you think. We told you each update is for only one character.
- Thread starter 7767
- Start date
Start your own blog or something. We don't care what you think. We told you each update is for only one character.
You're the one asking questions. You wanted to know if the update was only for Max, we told you it was. In fact, after telling you the game has always exclusively updated one character at a time, you said we were generalizing. How many fucking brain cells do you have...
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 929
You were generalizing when you said "All updates have always been extending only one route." That is simply not true. NOT ALL and NOT ALWAYS! And I mean "you" as SINGULAR.
- Jun 16, 2017
- 7,155
- 7,941
One route for one character each month. The same for the other character the following month.
0.36 Max, 0.37 Kate.
Sure, the update ratio was 2 Kate:1 Max at one point but it's not the case any more.
What's so hard to follow about this?
0.36 Max, 0.37 Kate.
Sure, the update ratio was 2 Kate:1 Max at one point but it's not the case any more.
What's so hard to follow about this?
- Apr 24, 2020
- 6,699
- 10,960
Ok, so which update(s) updated both paths? I personally don't know of any, at least since I've been following the game.
In case your question has been misunderstood, if you are asking if any of the Kate content has been updated in the route where you play Max, then the answer is no. If you are asking if the Kate content has been updated in the route where you play Kate, the answer is also no.
Technically, there was an early update where two routes were extended in one update, but that was when the male character was Alex. Since the second MC became Max, and Alex was abandoned as a character, the updates have always been focused on only one route. If you don't believe me, you can go through the change logs:
You must be registered to see the links
As for the question of how they could say this is the biggest update ever, that seems to be what they always say, so you should take it with a grain of salt.
- Nov 18, 2018
- 427
- 460
Are you really that dumb or are you pretending?
The developer releases the update for only one main character. If there is a game update for Kate, then there is no new content for Max. Conversely, if a game update has been released for Max, then there is no content for Kate. What do you still not understand?
If you don't trust the game developer, don't play Glamour
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 929
Guys, you make me crazy.. Now really, since, as you say, it WAS ALREADY something else than 1 Max 1 Kate before, can you guys not understand that, at least theoretically, that MAY be the case again now or in the future? These things are not set in stone! I just asked, to make sure that it is still 1/1 and to not lose time playing when there is no new content on that route.
Why the fuck is it so difficult to just answer: "no Kate in this update" instead of filing pages of comments according to which I'm an idiot and you are all supermen. And of course i must answer that and then it goes on and on.. Stop that shit, please!
And to ANGEL KATE: Till now I refrained from calling you names whenever you called me names, out of sympathy for Kate Beckinsale who's picture you feature. But should you do that one more time, I will answer accordingly. And FYI: my trust in this developer is not related to the game itself but to his previous "announcements". That's not a reason to stop playing this game, which I like. If anybody should stop anything, that would be you stopping to tell me what I should or should not do. You may be a Domina, but I'm no fuckin' sub!
Last edited:
You asked if there was anything new for Kate in 0.36. You were told no, because it was a Max update and that means no new Kate content. You made the assertion that despite the changelog never mentioning anything for Kate, that there must be because of DS's use of (again) "biggest update", which is nothing short of either stupidity on your part, or deliberate trolling.
You were also told that updates focus on one of them each time, never both, which you disagreed with. The ratio of updates between Kate and Max is an entirely separate thing from what you asked and what you disagreed with.
The closest you can get to make an assertion that both received updates at the same time, was the change of engine, which is an extreme technicality that's only of use as trolling. Not for pedantry, just for trolling.
Rather appropriately, the change of engine was kind of trolling in itself. It was the next version that came immediately after one that was dedicated to bugfixes when it was Unity.
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 929
OK .. you don't wanna stop.. we go on then ..
- you say: "You asked if there was anything new for Kate in 0.36. You were told no, because it was a Max update and that means no new Kate content."
That is exactly what I was NOT TOLD. If I was told "no" I would have had an answer and this whole discussion wouldn't be necessary. But I was NOT told "no" I was told to read the OP which I already did before and on the OP there is no sentence saying "there is no Kate content in this update". I could of course GUESS or "assume" that there is no Kate but I wanted to be sure in order to not lose time playing for content that doesn't exist. And that's why I asked.
- you say: "You made the assertion that despite the changelog never mentioning anything for Kate, that there must be because of DS's use of (again) "biggest update"
Not mentioning something, doesn't mean that that something doesn't exist. And I never said it MUST BE but it MAY BE , (because it WAS the case before and because something called "biggest update" could, or even should be a little bigger than what we can see on only the Max route in this update)
- you say: "which is nothing short of either stupidity on your part, or deliberate trolling"
My IQ is 130. What's yours?
- you say: "You were also told that updates focus on one of them each time, never both, which you disagreed with."
Your above statement (apart from not being an answer to my original question but a comment to a comment made by me later) is NOT TRUE! Ever heard of NEVER SAY NEVER? There WERE cases when both routes were in the same update. "Never" means something else.. Not the case in the last 2 updates but there were others before with both routes inside! And something that has been, can be again. Which is why forums exist, to ask questions and to get answers on them not to be called names for asking.
- you say: "The ratio of updates between Kate and Max is an entirely separate thing from what you asked and what you disagreed with."
If it's a "separate thing", how comes that thing should answer my question?
And what i "disagreed with" (not inside my question but later, as a comment to a comment) was the ratio of 1/1 because as I explained above, that was NOT ALWAYS SO! And claiming that it was NEVER different is NOT TRUE!
- you say: "The closest you can get to make an assertion that both received updates at the same time, was the change of engine, which is an extreme technicality that's only of use as trolling. Not for pedantry, just for trolling."
Again WRONG: the "closest I can get" is the FACTS (there were NOT ALWAYS either 1 Kate or 1 Max but sometimes also mixed), not the change of engine, of which I have no idea and about which I never asked. But about which you seem to be "trolling", probably trying to show again how "knowledgeable" you are.
Short said: as long as somebody keeps trying to switch my words or to accuse me of things that I didn't do, i will HAVE TO keep answering. Because I do not accept that!
In fact what you accuse me of is "not assuming" that this update should be 1 route only, based on the fact that other (BUT NOT ALL) updates were 1 route only. Sorry but i do not like to assume or to guess.. I want to KNOW FOR SURE. And when i don't know for sure, I ask!
But with people like you it makes no sense to ask because what you answer is: "hey you idiot, can't you just assume what we assume?" My answer is: NOPE!
Yeah, sure... Couldn't figure out how to save the game and had to come here to ask how. Might want to remove one of those numbers if your reasoning/problem solving is still that bad.
Yes, I remember your "problem" with the FAQ not catering to the special brand of troll that you are.
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 929
The question was "What's your IQ" whereby "I" does not stand for "imagination".
Yeah, sure... Couldn't figure out how to save the game and had to come here to ask how. Might want to remove one of those numbers if your reasoning/problem solving is still that bad.
Yes, I remember your "problem" with the FAQ not catering to the special brand of troll that you are.
0. waitasec... is there actual sex content with fem mc? (like penetrations of any sort)
i any mod (for time +|- tweaks? and energy/food/arousal all that)
for now it looks im fine without it. but i assume it wouldnt hurt.
ii where do saves go? so that i could tweak other thingies (cash,relationships etc)
iii. 'main' dialogues size is alright (when 2 npc figures and the text is inbetween)
...but in POVish shots the text is rather small. i tried to expand in options (100->130%) but didnot seem to work . how to enlarge it then?
* i thought mc gial is the bb one... but bb-gial is a classmate of mc ...and mc is a look-alike o_o
i any mod (for time +|- tweaks? and energy/food/arousal all that)
for now it looks im fine without it. but i assume it wouldnt hurt.
ii where do saves go? so that i could tweak other thingies (cash,relationships etc)
iii. 'main' dialogues size is alright (when 2 npc figures and the text is inbetween)
...but in POVish shots the text is rather small. i tried to expand in options (100->130%) but didnot seem to work . how to enlarge it then?
*
i thought mc gial is the bb one... but bb-gial is a classmate of mc ...and mc is a look-alike o_o
Last edited:
- Nov 18, 2018
- 427
- 460
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Jan 16, 2019
- 1,476
- 929
At the beginning of the game there were no icons to click and to save or load or options or anything, no interface! It was a (long) "scene", the "prologue" probably.. and during "scenes" you CAN NOT SAVE (in this engine, other than in other engines). But I had no way to know at that time that this game starts with a "scene" in which right click does nothing and that the interface elements appear only later. This is not normal or usual as also this particular engine is unusual (for me). There may be a short introduction without interface but this was very long. As far as i could tell, it could have even been a bug, so I had to ask. After all there WAS such a bug in a certain version (later) when the interface was not showing..
After a while the icons appeared and of course I know what to click when there IS something to click. But there was NOTHING to click as I asked. Sorry for using this board for help.. as far as I know, that may be even the main reason of such boards.
Last edited:
Hi, I'm playing Kate's story...I have to unlock the story "A new tradition" and I don't know how to unlock college punishments at home...if I watch the walkthrough I have to unlock "Homework step 4" but the prerequisite to start " Homework "story is Punishment rule: Principal's office without panties...but how do I activate the punishment without panties in the principal's office?
Pls help me!! thank you!!
Pls help me!! thank you!!
Did you purchase the laptop? Show us a screen shot of your college committee quest as well as the laptop college site to see how far you've unlocked the punishment rules.