Yes, some know better, some don't, but they don't care, that is exactly my point. They only care about how it affects them in the here and now. Short term gain, outweighs any long term benefits. We see it all over the place. Their greed is killing us.
Again, this loss of longevity doesn't really affect them, as they will be dead long before that would matter. When talking about the common elves, Lin is about 300, which is the equivalent of 20ish of a human, meaning her natural lifespan would be 4-5 times that. Half of that for the half elf would still be 6-800 years.
You keep saying that the death rate is higher, but we have no evidence of that other than with the free elves, mostly due to being captured, and not being able to live that way. You can't raise a thriving society when you have to live in hiding and on the run. Unless I am forgetting something (very possible), I don't remember anything to show their population is declining.
Even if they are heading for extinction due to low birthrates, this is a long term problem, and we have shown that the people don't care about things that far into the future. Even if they shorten the elves' lives by 50-75% they still out live us by several generations.
--------------
As for Kali, from what I remember, his plan is to start giving her power once she finishes school, and that will increase as she shows that she can handle it. I also would say that the MC could, at least in theory, be a possible figurehead, to help make decisions, leaving her to do what she loves (she has stated that she hates the business part of it). Better to see her grow into it, but she always has him there for support.
That said, even if she leaves running the company to the board, and just focuses on making things, living off of her stocks and other earnings, she will have more than enough to help fund a political campaign, we have seen similar examples in real life. I could give a long list, but that would get us too far into real world politics.
Yes, and a death because the elf was treated so poorly she couldn't survive would be in the short term. Like I said, we aren't talking death from built up issues, we're talking things that can take only a few years, not a few hundred, at most to kill.
The loss of longevity is but a secondary issue that affects only the long term unless it is reduced below a certain threshold, a threshold which is what I am referring to. If conditions are bad enough, it won't take all that long to start losing elf slaves.
I'm not saying the death rate actually is higher, what I'm saying is that, if this poor treatment continues, it will be and it won't take that long to get there.
The birth rate decline, which is not confirmed, would normally be a long term issue much like it is in some real world countries. However, as conditions continue to take their toll and elves die of things other than completely unpreventable causes, things their masters could have fixed long ago before it was a problem and chose to ignore, the birth rate decline would accelerate to a point where it would shift to a short term problem. This would not even be possible with an infinite resource, but elves are not infinite.
Knowing Kali, I'm sure she has a shot at a great deal of power coming from her father. She is pretty intelligent and seems to have some sense of how things would work in his position. I could definitely see the MC as a figurehead considering his connection to her, maybe even coming on as some sort of actual position with some authority. No way he would get something big, but I could maybe see him as some sort of consultant or regional head for Syl'anar operations while she focuses on overall operations. This would let her be more focused on the big picture while he focuses entirely on his little part of it so she doesn't have to keep her attention there. She could also have other similar positions for other outlying areas that could become more of a funding operation to be funneled into the political battle ahead. I would still consider the figurehead idea as more likely considering her feelings on the business.
The board might actually prove to be an issue if it happens, but it depends who is on it, whether they support her or the opposition. If they support Cornwall or another pro-slave candidate, I could very easily see her getting ousted by the board if she lets them know her position since she would become a threat to them if they were pro-slave. That said, you're right, she should still have enough personal funding even if it would be harder to fight a political battle against slavery.
Apparently, I wasn't clear. I knew you were refering to elven extinction; my question was intended to make you realise they're in absolutely no danger of being driven to extinction through their mistreatment. I thought that was clear, but here we are...
It doesn't need to be infnite, nor did I ever say it was; it simply needs to be sustainable, and we've seen no evidence that it isn't. On the contrary, we've been told that their population has grown tremendously while they've been enslaved (even during the period when they had fewer rights, and their mistreatment was far more acute), which is the exact opposite of your claim. It is a demonstrable fact of the setting that, while being terribly mistreated, the elven population gre from tens of millins to over a billion. That fact is incompatible with your assertion that their mistreatment is driving them to extinction.
You might as well say "once the sun rises in the north and sets in the batman symbol". Again, they'd have to be getting murdered at the rate of tens of thousands every single day to even slow the population growth, let alone reverse it. There is no evidence the elven population is shrinking. Since the burden of proof is on the person making the positive claim (i.e. you) you're the one who needs to present some evidence that their population is declining. Thus far, you've failed to do so, outside repetiton, which isn't particularly compelling evidence.
First off, there doesn't actually need to be; you're the one making the claim that their extinction is imminent, so you're the one who needs to present evdence to that effect. I don't have to present evidence refuting your position; you need to present evidence supporting it.
Secondly, yes, there is. They've been mistreated since they were conquered, according to Lin they were treated far worse than they are being treated now, and yet their population has grown tremendously, from tens of millions to over a billion in only three centuries. If their mistreatment was having a negative affect on their ability to live, there'd be a whole lot less of them.
Nope. That'd only be true if the deaths caused by their mistreatment outstripped their ability to breed, and you've provided no evidence that's the case. If it were, then their population would have consistently declined over the centuries they were mistreated. The reverse happened, which means they must be procreating at a faster rate than they're being killed. It's pretty simple math. A - B = C; if C is a positive number, then A must be greater than B.
Not quite; it's assuming an annual birthrate of 18.5 million (based on the human average of 18.5 per 1,000), which works out at roughly 50,500 per day. It's worth noting that was me erring on the side of caution, since it's more likely their birthrate is higher than the human average, because they're being breed like livestock; because they literally ARE livestock (as in, they're classed as "animals breed to produce labour").
They're also clearly not that difficult to impregnate, otherwise there wouldn't be over a billion of them. Elves in other fictional settings are often depicted as far less fertile than humans, but so what? This isn't the Silmarillion, they aren't Asur or Eldar, they're Harem Hotels elves, and only their traits mattter, not the traits of other settings. Given the number of them in this fictional setting, they cannot have a low birthrate. Again, it's pretty simple math. To grow from tens of millions to over a billion in 300 years, their birthrate simply cannot be lower than the human norm; it must, in fact, be noticeably higher.
You don't seem to have understood what I was saying. I wasn't suggesting "breeding" 50,000 elves. I was pointing out that a billion elves would produce over 50,000 viable births per day, if they have the same birthrate as humans. If it's higher (which is likely, given how quickly their population grew to its current level) then they'd produce more.
It's also worth noting your math was way off; assuming an average procreation rate (18.5 per 1,000), then breeding 50,000 hypothetical elves would produce an average of 925 viable offspring in a year (the succesful procreation rate already accounts for non-viable pregnancies). You were off by nearly a full order of magnitude.
Which is still vastly longer than their owner will live, and who gives a damn what happens to them after that? Owner X will only get labour out of their slaves until they (Owner X) dies; any labour past that point, be it a day or 500 years, is completely irrelevant to Owner X, since they never see any of the benefit of that labour (on account of the whole "being dead" situation). The hypothetical half elf might die at 250, instead of 500, but so what? Why should Owner X give a damn about those 250 years of lost labour that only becomes relevant two centuries after Owner X is dead and buried?
So? Did their owner make more money out of working them to death than the cost of a new slave? If the answer is yes, then no harm, no foul. By working them to death, you make $5000 in a year. A new slave cost $1000. If you treated them well, you'd have made $3000 in that same year. Therefore, working them to death and then buying a new slave is more profitable that treating a slave well. The only cost is one dead elf, and who cares? There are always more elves.
I'm not sure why you're having such difficulty with the concept that people don't treat their slaves very well; it's a documented historical fact that people abused and mistreated slaves in the real-world, that many of them were worked to death in deplorable conditions, so why do you think the people in this fictional setting would do otherwise?
Only if more die in a year than are being born, and again, we've seen no evidence supporting such a supposition. Repeating a fallacious position doesn't make it less fallacious, no matter how often you repeat it.
They aren't? How are you so sure? Where are the stats that prove elves aren't already dying from the conditions they are kept in? If conditions are bad enough, yes, they will start dying off, and if breeding can't keep up, they go extinct. Eventually, breeding won't be enough unless ALL elves are diverted to breeding, which then means no elves are working their normal economy supporting duties. That would grind the economy to a halt with no extinction necessary.
In order for something to not be expended eventually, yes, it does need to be infinite. The elves are not and they are living under conditions that pose a threat to them. They will all die off eventually whether the humans like it or not. What the humans are doing is making the 'when' of that event sooner by exposing the elves to the potential for death by effect of the conditions they live in, which isn't long term, that could happen in a decade or less if the humans aren't careful. That's the furthest thing from sustainable, sustainable would be keeping the elves in at least the minimal conditions required to keep them alive throughout their natural lives. The elves are going through population growth now, but that may change depending on if things continue to deteriorate or not. I never said it was now driving them to extinction, I said it would if things continue as they have.
Which it very well could outstrip said ability, keep in mind that all of these arguments are future tense, not distant future, but not the present. This is something that hasn't happened, but easily could.
As for the difficulty in impregnation, is there any indication how long it took to get that population level? It certainly wasn't overnight, not saying you said that. The fact that there are billions doesn't speak for ease of impregnation unless it happened over a short period and that means they would be even easier than humans to impregnate if true. On the 'so what' part, I was using the common depiction due to a lack of HH specifc biological statistics on elf breeding. Without numbers specific to HH, the only thing I have to go on is how elves are normally portrayed IF something goes into that much detail. Humans just aren't a good stand in for a fantasy race in these things.
No, I understood you meant 50,000 offspring from a billion elves, what I said was using my own numbers. It is still entirely possible, and actually highly likely, you won't get a 1:1 birth rate off a specified number of bred elves and the ratio is actually more likely to be quite a bit lower. That was my point. This was accountiing for other issues that affect most, if not all beings in birthing including conditions that could result in the pregnancy not being viable either under normal parameters or the pregnancy going fine and the offspring not being viable for the labor force for some reason and also took into account that these are not humans we are talking about and, as far as anyone knows, they don't have the same birth capability.
Vastly longer if allowed to exist for that long, but conditions may take them out of the labor force before then either by disability or death, that's what I've been saying with each section about the end of life for any given elf, they could die from conditions in their enslavement that would prevent living anywhere near their full lifespan, as I said, they could last maybe a decade or less, maybe more before something ends them that could have been prevented if their oh so great master had given them the minimal level of treatment, at least, that would have kept that from happening.
And if the answer is no, the former owner has now taken the one thing they definitely wanted to avoid, a financial loss. What if they run iinto a situation where all the available slaves are basically Sylvia priced, you know, super high price that we, the player, had to grind out to get to? That's a pretty big loss to take and I'm pretty sure that isn't even considered viable in the short term. They are at the mercy of the market in that situation and the market can be brutal at times, especially if its a slave labor market.
We don't have evidence of it now, but remember, these are future tense arguments. They are not what is happening, they are what the future holds if things keep going downhill. I just hope the MC and his harem can stop it before that happens. As much as I would love to see the slave market coming crashing down in a chaotic inferno, figurative inferno even though I am fully in support of backing Nia's approach to the situation, I would rather not have that happen at the expense of elven lives.
*blatant hint to drop the arguement*
So, on a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate each characters breasts?
Lin and Ashley are 10s, the rest are 1s except android, who is a special case because of her size changing ability. If you can't tell by that, I prefer smaller ones and always take the android's small option in applicable scenes for size change. If this was a rating of a different sort, there would be much more variation in numbers.
Kali's are the breast and I will accept no alternatives in this matter.
Pun intended.
I see what you did there.