- Mar 18, 2018
- 88
- 117
DeletedIt was already posted and also maybe you should put a spoiler tag on this pictures? YW
DeletedIt was already posted and also maybe you should put a spoiler tag on this pictures? YW
Don't you have anything better to do than harassing someone who has been more successful in life than you?So to leak a game without getting caught, you need to be smart? Didn't expect this from you actually.
Your words means nothing on f95 or any other pirate site actually, the first to leak a game is always a hero. I don't get it myself but it is what it is and your effort will be fruitless to the point that even your game's hardcore fans will enjoy it in a hiding or openly.
Crazy people tends to say that others are crazy, for a hard working Dev, you sure waste too much of your time saying that "I am a hardworking dev", while most hardworking people tends to be humble.
Also it's been 9 months since the previous release what are you "hard" working on?
Thanks, btw who are you?
Lol you presume too much, and those weren't harrassments rather facts, if you think it's harrassment, it's on you.Don't you have anything better to do than harassing someone who has been more successful in life than you?
Turns out Dev is also a blackmailer but she backed out from it as soon as I called her out for it.Why did the developer stop visiting here with her official account? I think she just used this site to popularize her game. She now earns in excess of 5,000 dollars a month. It all seems so unfair, just look at the membership levels on her Patreon page. People are ready to literally throw money at her for nothing, and she still shows petty behavior like taking down the links to the test version. Why not just let us poor people enjoy the game? What a money-grubbing bitch!
I've taken the unusual step of signing back in -- I can't stop leaks and have been generally ok with them but I just want to be sure that people understand ahead of time that if I shift to Anais' game very soon in the future and let this go -- who specifically was most responsible for this decision. I hope all are doing well!
I'm confused now, as well. I thought it was Yvette saying that the slaves were deaf and she was in the know. But as Miles pointed out, it was Elena who stated that fact. So there's 3 possibilities here: (1) Veronica & Yvette are playing a long con to make Elena believe that what she knows is true (2) Veronica has even kept Yvette in the dark to ensure that everyone believes that the slaves are deaf (3) The cleaners are indeed deaf and V is a monster.Did the "hearing loss" situation become clearer to you after Tess' response?
For me, no..I think it's gotten more confusing, hehe. And now the question of why Vi lied to her mother has really come up (as MilesEdgeworth rightly pointed out.). And if in regards to Elena you explained the possible logic of what's going on, now we have Yvette as well. At least, if Veronica really would have deafened all her servants, there would be no point in giving such an ornate answer to such a simple question, right?) Uff..We need Sherlock Holmes, or better yet, TessSadist, back from the office.
![]()
Why is it Alessandra? That doesn't make sense to me at all.
When White-Tips and The Gambit Queen are talking they say things like:
How does Alessandra have board votes? From what I understand it's Julliette and Dominique that have three votes each, right? And Veronica is the one that refuses to help either of them.
(Also, this conversation takes place well before Dominique and Juliette decide to 'team up' during the boat scene when they realize Olivia has a real shot at taking over the company. So it's not like they're talking about 3 votes for the Dominique + Julliette alliance and 3 votes for Olivia)
White-Tips, during that conversation with Gambit Queen also says:
Alessandra is actually pushing for Olivia to take over the company, so why would the White-Tips (Ms. Grym Gudinna) be concerned about Elena not supporting them over Olivia if White-Tips actually is Alessandra?
Alessandra's support for Olivia is shown later on the boat scene:
I thought it was Yvette saying that the slaves were deaf and she was in the know. But as Miles pointed out, it was Elena who stated that fact. So there's 3 possibilities here: (1) Veronica & Yvette are playing a long con to make Elena believe that what she knows is true (2) Veronica has even kept Yvette in the dark to ensure that everyone believes that the slaves are deaf (3) The cleaners are indeed deaf and V is a monster.
But then why would Tess give an answer that allowed for different interpretations?From the scene to me it seems Yvette is just a good woman, unlike her daughter. And she is shocked by her daughter's actions. Personally, I see no reason for any of them lying about the slaves being deaf, it serves no purpose. If Veronica wanted to leak the conversation to 3rd party, there are easier ways to do that - bugs, cameras etc. Not some random slave that is supposedly deaf, but in reality is listening in on the convo, and whom we never see again. I think Occam's Razor is the way to go here - it's just the nature of the world they live in and Veronica is so past caring about human life and dignity that she (and everyone else for that matter) would deafen a person just because she can.
After all, if Veronica really did deaf all of her servants, it would make much more sense to give a one-word answer like "She did it." Wouldn't it?Err got a sec on my way out to office now so not able to respond again but it might be relevant who said who was deaf and who else was in the room. (I hope I am remembering this correctly heh I was being very precise with it from memory but it's been a while)
Yeah, I wish I hadn't asked Tess about that. Now we're even more confused.I'm confused now, as well. I thought it was Yvette saying that the slaves were deaf and she was in the know. But as Miles pointed out, it was Elena who stated that fact. So there's 3 possibilities here: (1) Veronica & Yvette are playing a long con to make Elena believe that what she knows is true (2) Veronica has even kept Yvette in the dark to ensure that everyone believes that the slaves are deaf (3) The cleaners are indeed deaf and V is a monster.
Keeping aside that little interaction I have highlighted before, any of these can be true. Only Tess can answer this since only she knows what the characters have or have not done off-screen.
Well that's easy to answer - to mess with us and watch us squirm, that's what I would do if I were in her place. You know, watching neckbeards on a porn forum exhaust themselves with all sorts of theories might be something Miss Tess would do. Or, as she said, she was in a hurry and perhaps misremembered or didn't phrase the response correctly.But then why would Tess give an answer that allowed for different interpretations?
Hmm, at least, Tess has never done that before and either understated (if it's a spoiler), or answered quite directly and specifically (if the information in her opinion could already be revealed)..So, I'm inclined to your 2nd option. Well, I can try asking about it on her Discord when Tess has time to chat there.Well that's easy to answer - to mess with us and watch us squirm, that's what I would do if I were in her place. You know, watching neckbeards on a porn forum exhaust themselves with all sorts of theories might be something Miss Tess would do. Or, as she said, she was in a hurry and perhaps misremembered or didn't phrase the response correctly.
I found this after going through some very early chapters. The "right now" feels like the deafness was temporary. So either Elena didn't understand it properly (or I didn't). This could have given Elena the impression that V's slaves are permanently deaf while they're only temporarily devoid of hearing. Otherwise, how does Elena know of this, but Yvette doesn't? Making dozens of slaves deaf would be a big operation. Yvette was surprised since she had not heard any of this and just learned from Elena's (erroneous) interpretation. English is not my first language so it could be me misunderstanding here.From the scene to me it seems Yvette is just a good woman, unlike her daughter. And she is shocked by her daughter's actions. Personally, I see no reason for any of them lying about the slaves being deaf, it serves no purpose. If Veronica wanted to leak the conversation to 3rd party, there are easier ways to do that - bugs, cameras etc. Not some random slave that is supposedly deaf, but in reality is listening in on the convo, and whom we never see again. I think Occam's Razor is the way to go here - it's just the nature of the world they live in and Veronica is so past caring about human life and dignity that she (and everyone else for that matter) would deafen a person just because she can.
Unless she gives a clear answer or this is cleared later in the game, I doubt we will be able to close thisYeah, I wish I hadn't asked Tess about that. Now we're even more confused
That's a very interesting observation, I missed this on my recent playthrough.I found this after going through some very early chapters. The "right now" feels like the deafness was temporary. So either Elena didn't understand it properly (or I didn't).
I found this after going through some very early chapters. The "right now" feels like the deafness was temporary. So either Elena didn't understand it properly (or I didn't). This could have given Elena the impression that V's slaves are permanently deaf while they're only temporarily devoid of hearing. Otherwise, how does Elena know of this, but Yvette doesn't? Making dozens of slaves deaf would be a big operation. Yvette was surprised since she had not heard any of this and just learned from Elena's (erroneous) interpretation. English is not my first language so it could be me misunderstanding here.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
And getting information via bugs against Veronica will be far-fetched. Why would Veronica have bugs in her own room and leak that? Wouldn't it immediately alarm Dominique or Juliette about who bugged Veronica if it was neither of them? And why they are leaking that, and whether they could trust info from such sources? Using a slave to start a rumor is much more subtle than electronic evidence.
While the simplest solution looks to be the most straight-forward one, this isn't necessarily true in KG. There's a lot of layers to what characters do or say
Unless she gives a clear answer or this is cleared later in the game, I doubt we will be able to close this
Right now...in English, would definitely mean...'for' now...temporary.That's a very interesting observation, I missed this on my recent playthrough.
English is not my 1st language either, and I believe it's true for Miss Tess as well. So, even though the writing is excellent (both narrative and grammar), mistakes may happen on occasion. No work of art is infallible (and yes, I do consider games to be an artform).
To sum up my position on the whole deaf slaves business - I think we are ultimately looking for details that are simply not there. I believe the scene serves as an exposition for some plot points as well as a characterisation of the women in the room. Veronica doesn't see slaves as human beings, but only as tools for her wants and experiments, Yvette clearly didn't expect such actions from her daughter (which leads me to believe that her alignment is Good), and Elena simply admits that that's the state of the world they are in.
It's very possible that it's Astrid. Cole being the 7th board member isn't just far-fetched, it's impossible because when Olivia is told that Elena will be giving her board seat to her, she is also told that there are a few others who have multiple parents that were founders. None of the girls besides Veronica fits this category. Astrid would too though.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Tess tells us who grym gunida is. Even if the second meeting with pat could be explained away. The fact that Pat is meeting with her in secret can't.
As for the votes, I assume it's for the gambit. If it was just for the person, the queen wouldn't be talking about Elena possibly getting what she wants since what Elena wants wouldn't be any of the sisters not named olivia winning it.
Alessandra's not supporting Olivia, the only person currently supporting Olivia other than Elena is Veronica and I believe that's only because she's supporting Kane and what he wants.
Well let's do a simple table:It's very possible that it's Astrid. Cole being the 7th board member isn't just far-fetched, it's impossible because when Olivia is told that Elena will be giving her board seat to her, she is also told that there are a few others who have multiple parents that were founders. None of the girls besides Veronica fits this category. Astrid would too though.
As for 'imbalance of power' multiple people tell Veronica on different occasions that she could easily take control of the company if she wanted.
Last msg for a while, but I wanted to recognize that I hoped someone would catch specific dialogue (I thought Cynthia grabbing Nadia's arm was way more obvious about something else) about multiple parents.It's very possible that it's Astrid. Cole being the 7th board member isn't just far-fetched, it's impossible because when Olivia is told that Elena will be giving her board seat to her, she is also told that there are a few others who have multiple parents that were founders. None of the girls besides Veronica fits this category. Astrid would too though.
As for 'imbalance of power' multiple people tell Veronica on different occasions that she could easily take control of the company if she wanted.
Oh, we did notice that, as well as how Nadia behaved in the Red Room and in her suite (with computers and a slave girl). Food for thought.Last msg for a while, but I wanted to recognize that I hoped someone would catch specific dialogue (I thought Cynthia grabbing Nadia's arm was way more obvious about something else) about multiple parents.![]()
Man... i´m so confused here, what is the problem with Dover? I don´t know him in real life and my interactions with him here are a few, but what has he done?I will be clear about the piracy issue once and for all -- it's fine to do what you want, I wanted to make clear that a specific poster named Dover is a bad actor that has nothing to do with leaks. He is not a hero because of his character, not because of any leaks he has done or will do. I will not consider any third party leaker a bad actor in that sense.