I am not honestly sure. What I did the first time around was screw up to see what the bad ending was and when I saw did it happened. However the author mentioned you can only get that ending once so if you keep getting the ultimate bad end the game already registered the soft bad end happened.
I would say no. You already got NTRed by the guy you are psychoanalyzing in the past so the ink is dry, so to speak. But there are multiple playthroughs where you can steal his woman. So you are the NTR guy. So it is still NTR. So still no.
You missed the one shot Bad ending light where Mark remembers you but instead of getting three women for himself he instead sends you a pic of naked pick of Samantha with a dog leash on her neck and a pregnant Clara while giving you the middle finger.
Quite a lot, actually. You can try to take revenge and fuck it up. That is a bleak ending.
The best revenge is living well. But yes. You can get him thrown in prison and impregnate his wife while keeping your other patient and secretary as side pieces. Also, on the second playthrough, you got revenge on him years ago anyway when you locked him and your girlfriend in the basement.
I have to admit it is easy to do. This game has a weird concept that you have fewer options and less content the first time you play through. At the end of that first playthrough, your secretary will express disappointment and bewilderment at your decisions and the second time you play through you will have more options and more content. I am not certain, but I think that subsequent playthroughs are better suited to the revenge route while the first playthrough should be either the "good" route (forgiveness) or the failure route (NTR).
Used to be more common in the 90s. Most of my experience in regards to visual novels comes from that time.
I find that very interesting. I'm a bit of a newcomer to the genre and only really began to be interested in them a few years ago when a friend insisted I play the Doki Doki Literature Club game. It also required replays and other metatextual interactions. I then played a few of the games that it was a parody of and got sucked down the rabbit hole that eventually led me to this board. So it is very interesting to find that this used to be a more common convention.
I'm glad you wanted to continue with this game, it has a lot of potential.
Thank you for your kind words.
