I think Loser's riot made a valid criticism. Have yet to find the time to play it, but if the tags and possibly narration are from the female's perspective (female protagonist tag), it could conceivably also be female POV, which judging by the images and who it's geared towards, isn't.
Okay let's see then.
Female protagonist but male eyes view... FACEPALM !
How is that valid ? How a third person view without any narrator even a "male eyes view" ?
You HAVE ALL millions male games in this site. Your life vill be end early then you play 1% local male games
The first part is hyperbole so I wouldn't count it as "valid" since it is not supposed to be true.
The second part is non-sensical but let's not be petty here, if you punch thought to scrape a modicum of sense they probably meant something akin to "it wouldn't hurt you if 1% more of those millions of games were female protagonist", so indeed that's true, but it is kind of implying that there is less than 1/100 ratio of female pov game than male pov games while it is actually around 2/10.
Given how much I had to reach to understand the sentence at first I don't give them a "valid" here for a half-truth.
I complain that the game is for a woman, and the view from the eyes of a man. The narrative would not have gone anywhere if the view was from the eyes of a girl and not a guy.
So here is an interesting piece.
There is the base assumption that a third person view is by default a male view. I don't find that to be true. It is a biais if I ever saw one.
But if we want to get more psychoanalytic about it, okay, sure it is overlooking the action so in a sense it could be closer to the view of the male character.
There is also some views that are indeed quite close to the point of view of the male character.
Yet I think that a staple of the PoV genre is to see the body of the main character which is the host of the PoV, otherwise that's just a close view.
We also have to take into consideration that there is a camera during the scene, and that there is some views directly from it as well as a good number views very close to it.
So I admit there is some few second person view going on (second since the male character is not the first person here) but we can clearly see that the girl is not looking at the point of view in the majority of the rest of the view that are close to the male one so clearly not second person view and squarely third person view.
Something that actors purposefully do or not (looking at the camera).
I would say that the camera work here is clearly there to support the story. And I would argue that it would be totally pointless to have a PoV view here :
The girls has a spotlight aimed at her, in a dark room, there is nothing much to see other than the dude just being there.
So the point that the story wouldn't be hurt is actually false. It would have been better to have a textual game being narrated by the girl and the scenes described by her rather than some either completely dark or completely bright images with a silhouette and sometime a bit of her body shown (she is curling up from pleasure and thus looking at the ceiling a lot.
I would finish that it is quite hypocritical to complain about game being "male PoV" while they are in extreme majority third person while erotic books are overwhelmingly female protagonist and PoV.
And that's how you translate a female PoV text to the screen by the way. You show her reactions and focus entirely on her body.