I wouldn't hold my breath since afaik there won't be much (if any) new contentdoes anyone know when next update is out? 0.52
I wouldn't hold my breath since afaik there won't be much (if any) new contentdoes anyone know when next update is out? 0.52
I will have to review what was done in mod to resolve this as it was an issue in 49.9, unassigned jobs was causing all kinds of integration issues.So, everything I've read says this is a bit of a dirty "fix", but I tried it and it appears to work. I didn't get the crash, Gabby's job changed to "Stripper", and when I opened console and typedprint strip_club_no_of_strippers
after the dialog ended it returned 5, which is what it should theoretically be if it incremented properly
I added two lines to role_cousin.rpy, one at line 124 and another at what will be line 129 after the first line is added. So the block between lines 123-131 should look like
Remember to space, not tab, while editingCode:def special_stripper_hire(the_person): global strip_club_no_of_strippers #defining the global keyword to prevent crash bug? ~dalzomo strip_club_no_of_strippers += 1 #Increase the list target to account for Gabrielle stripper_hire(the_person) #Add her to the stripper list def special_stripper_leave(the_person): global strip_club_no_of_strippers #defining the global keyword to prevent crash bug? ~dalzomo strip_club_no_of_strippers -= 1 #Decrease the list target to account for Gabrielle leaving stripper_replace(the_person) #Remove her from the pool and generate a replacement if necessary
I didn't call you an idiot. I question your negativity and cognitive dissonance because I think you are intelligent but wrong.My original post, the one in which you called me an idiot for, is that he can't code.
I've been following the codebase off an on for more than one year. They typically stub out a lot of features and return to flesh it out later. You didn't find an example of the developer doing minimum effort you found work in progress.As for why I say it's less than minimum effort, well that's because it is. If there was broken code or even commented out code that doesn't work or even just a statement "This actually doesn't work" then it shows Vren tried/failed/moved on respectively. Instead the model event tells the player "You get +40% value for serums next week" and this doesn't actually happen as at no point does it check for this information or show it would have checked for this information.
That's disingenuous. There is a free full version. Typically reliably released with new features every single month. Tell me you're not one of those people who believe that developers should make something people enjoy, use, and value and want to support but developers don't deserve any financial help. Not even your money (you never paid) but you're upset that other people want to support their work with their hard earned money. This sounds like rank jealousy. Essentially trying to cancel their project? Is that you? Is that who you want to be?It's not free if he's making a little under $3,000 a month while working on it.
The making it clear it's WIP is a valid criticism and suggestion, in my opinion. Making that suggestion in a positive way could improve the game you care about. A while ago, I suggested unit tests to catch some frequent bugs. To their credit, they added some test coverage. Doesn't fit your narrative about their "minimum effort", does it?I'm actually not angry, you are the one lashing out at my criticisms, which are still valid criticisms whether you choose to agree with them or not. I posted about it, because I was shocked at just how much of the game I had to "fill in the blanks" for which is a rarity even in the porn game community. Usually you're just told up front "This feature is not supported" or "WIP(Work In Progress)".
Yes, you seem perfectly reasonable. I think you have a negatively hot take worthy of introspection. If I saw someone shitting on your efforts and work I would react same.I'll also note I haven't personally attacked you, but you sure went pretty far to come after me, with an adorable chart and everything. I think some retrospection is merited here if you believe me to be the angry one.
Unethical human experimentation often produces results at an astounding rate.hi
Is that a planned function or a bug. When i let someone test a serum i can use all my stamina with talk/complimet or flirt to repeat the growing 0,2 mastery points for the tested serum. That is in my eyes much to much becauce i jump in one month to advanced serums and i am looking to get the futuristic serums soon.
Everything in this game is both to some extend.hi
Is that a planned function or a bug. When i let someone test a serum i can use all my stamina with talk/complimet or flirt to repeat the growing 0,2 mastery points for the tested serum. That is in my eyes much to much becauce i jump in one month to advanced serums and i am looking to get the futuristic serums soon.
Works as designed as far as I know, but who knows if it will change. It does seem pretty quick to the point that extra research into a trait is almost entirely pointless.hi
Is that a planned function or a bug. When i let someone test a serum i can use all my stamina with talk/complimet or flirt to repeat the growing 0,2 mastery points for the tested serum. That is in my eyes much to much becauce i jump in one month to advanced serums and i am looking to get the futuristic serums soon.
Observing via talk actions to raise mastery has been the most efficient way for a while because that's how we're supposed to do it. Vren only recently changed Nora's experimental traits so they can technically be researched the slow way in the lab because so many players don't pay attention to Steph when she tutorials us how to observe for masteryWorks as designed as far as I know, but who knows if it will change. It does seem pretty quick to the point that extra research into a trait is almost entirely pointless.
My point is that it is an odd game design choice to have option a) spend 20 person-turns of work for 1.0 mastery increase for ONE trait or b) spend 1 turn of 30 energy getting 0.4 mastery (or more likely 1 turn of 195 energy getting 1.3 mastery) for 5+ traits.Observing via talk actions to raise mastery has been the most efficient way for a while because that's how we're supposed to do it. Vren only recently changed Nora's experimental traits so they can technically be researched the slow way in the lab because so many players don't pay attention to Steph when she tutorials us how to observe for mastery
I would say that had he explained certain things don't do anything it would have definitely prevented any statement from me. It's more likely I would of offered to help get some things working as I just can't help myself when it comes to working on code. I bring up the income, because it's not charity. In my own patreon I consistently give clear communication of what is current, in development, or currently frozen. It's not that I'm bothered people want to pay him, it's that it makes me feel stupid that I go through that much effort when I could possibly get away with doing none of that.I didn't call you an idiot. I question your negativity and cognitive dissonance because I think you are intelligent but wrong.
You keep stating Vren can't code but clearly they have created a successful game because people play, enjoy, and support it.
My objection is that you are shitting on a developer working on their project.
I've been following the codebase off an on for more than one year. They typically stub out a lot of features and return to flesh it out later. You didn't find an example of the developer doing minimum effort you found work in progress.
That's disingenuous. There is a free full version. Typically reliably released with new features every single month. Tell me you're not one of those people who believe that developers should make something people enjoy, use, and value and want to support but developers don't deserve any financial help. Not even your money (you never paid) but you're upset that other people want to support their work with their hard earned money. This sounds like rank jealousy. Essentially trying to cancel their project? Is that you? Is that who you want to be?
The making it clear it's WIP is a valid criticism and suggestion, in my opinion. Making that suggestion in a positive way could improve the game you care about. A while ago, I suggested unit tests to catch some frequent bugs. To their credit, they added some test coverage. Doesn't fit your narrative about their "minimum effort", does it?
Yes, you seem perfectly reasonable. I think you have a negatively hot take worthy of introspection. If I saw someone shitting on your efforts and work I would react same.
I think that's been asked and answered a lot. It should be your name.Can you tell me the mom's compuer password?my game is stuck.thanks.
Thank you very muchI think that's been asked and answered a lot. It should be your name.
Not yet, but it has been suggested to Vren so maybe someday?cant i make sleeping pill ?