3.80 star(s) 5 Votes

HardcoreCuddler

Engaged Member
Aug 4, 2020
2,396
3,076
Man, AI art just does nothing for me. You can't help feeling something's off whenever you look at it, and they all look very samey. It's difficult to describe, but characters generated in this style look "dead".
it's because in the current way AI is trained today, it just gets the common factor out of a bunch of learning material.
I.E. it destroys every single element of uniqueness that may have existed in the original learning dataset. It's fucking baffling that people think AI art will ever be actual art considering this single thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AtomicR and Jexpor

SAM s-300

Active Member
Aug 4, 2017
812
339
it's because in the current way AI is trained today, it just gets the common factor out of a bunch of learning material.
I.E. it destroys every single element of uniqueness that may have existed in the original learning dataset. It's fucking baffling that people think AI art will ever be actual art considering this single thing.
We live in a age where duct taping a banana to a wall or stacking red buckets with sand and watching them fall over is now called art.
 

Innocent Chloe

Active Member
Jul 23, 2017
507
819
AIs are capable of imitating any artist they've been trained on, and not only are they getting better every month we're also getting better tools to work with AIs. If people make generic looking images with it it says more about them than about the capabilities of AIs. Just look at Artbreeder, sort the portrait category by "recent" and any day of the week it's filled with pages after pages of photorealistic pretty people with neutral or smiling expressions when you can make paintings of unhinged goobers who live in a society.
AI art can evolve as much as it wants, it never can replace that human touch

I've seen better plates of just blue paint in modern art galleries than I've seen anything AI art has produced and I know for a fact better than anything AI art ever will be able to produce

And before people reply that oh modern art sucks, well a lot of modern art sucks for the same reason all AI art sucks (namely a lot of modern artists doing the same generic things that are dumb). But there are exceptions in modern art where you still find really amazing art. With AI there is and never will be exception as by its very nature it can't be unique as it is an amalgamation of all art it is trained on. By definition it is thus generic art

There are no words in any language humans have made to express every single human emotion on the full range of human emotions. Humans can express emotions with simple changes in body language. AI will never be able to understand this as it has to put everything into categories, where do you put an emotion in a category that fits in 10 different categories all at once? AI by its very nature can't do that

On a side note, curious to see how fast mods sweep in here as I can tell already this entire thread is going to become a discussion about AI art lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Daame

rafkin

Newbie
Dec 13, 2019
78
80
It's not that I don't like AI art, but the next logical step (kinda really near-future) is AI programming, meaning anyone with a few ideas is going to be able to make a game. That might sound good but it's already difficult to find good games buried under a pile of garbage (this site is a perfect example), how many shite games are we going to get when everyone can make one?
 

PornSlut32

Newbie
Nov 28, 2021
42
6
Yeah, at first it was impressive but after the sheer amount that is made you actually start to recognise the pattern. The shading, lighting, proportions, coloring and poses are too uniform. Like, sure they look good in the frame but they dont have that "je ne sais quoi" that makes them feel alive... like the difference betwen an anotomically correct picture in a biology document and a hand made sketch with a live model.
I would agree but there are people training it on different art styles lately. I have been fooled a few times. But it does feel kinda awkward to look at compared to something you know was made by a person.
 

Norker

New Member
Nov 29, 2020
12
20
It's not that I don't like AI art, but the next logical step (kinda really near-future) is AI programming, meaning anyone with a few ideas is going to be able to make a game. That might sound good but it's already difficult to find good games buried under a pile of garbage (this site is a perfect example), how many shite games are we going to get when everyone can make one?
We just hope someone develops an AI that is good at finding good games
 

Qianke

Active Member
Apr 27, 2019
714
1,240
it's because in the current way AI is trained today, it just gets the common factor out of a bunch of learning material.
I.E. it destroys every single element of uniqueness that may have existed in the original learning dataset. It's fucking baffling that people think AI art will ever be actual art considering this single thing.
Money wants AI to be the thing so that productivity can be raised. It's capitalism. We live in an era where quality doesn't matter, it's all about soulless productivity. But it can go only for so long.
 

ThatGuy82

Member
Jan 20, 2021
166
119
which since i cant move the game window without even option to put game into windowed mode is a real pain in the arse.
Btw, control + enter is the universal toggle between windowed and fullscreen modes. I have a similar annoyance with the lack of settings menu, and certain Unity games will launch to monitor 1 even if my primary is monitor 0 (also, this is something the game designer can change in the Unity project settings, so there's plenty of Unity games out there which don't behave this way).


As for my thoughts on the demo...the camera needs a lot of work, as it is very jarring the way it moves when you dash, attack, get attacked, or when it's doing the "enemy about to cum" quick zooming in and out. The voice lines seem very out of place at times, and the lack of an in-game audio mixer (or settings menu in general) doesn't help that fact. The game appears to run at vsync, and the ingame time is one minute per 60 frames, so you can very easily get a popup twice in a second and it will be over a minute apart at higher refresh rates. The lack of transparency or any kind of visual indicator when mobs are obscured behind trees isn't very fun either. The art isn't too bad all things considered, though the side display when sexing the two available enemies in the game seems to only have one available design, which is the "already full of cum" display. That, and when the slug things cum you get a cut-in of a human doing it lol.

That said; the premise of the game seems straight-forward enough. If there are post-release updates to expand a bit of the content and adding in the much needed QOL devices, it might be worth considering watching it.
 

MrNTR

Active Member
Jan 23, 2019
865
771
Man, AI art just does nothing for me. You can't help feeling something's off whenever you look at it, and they all look very samey. It's difficult to describe, but characters generated in this style look "dead".
As for me, I have no issues with the AI art itself, they're actually very beautiful, but they all do feel "samey" and "dead" simply cuz there's not much variation or creativity within the scenes themselves. Basically, it's more of the context the AI art depicts rather than the AI art itself.

I imagine this is just a limitation within the programs themselves that doesn't really give much freedom in the variation of what you can create. I imagine this will get better over time.
 

FlamesOfVengeance

Well-Known Member
Jul 16, 2019
1,443
1,598
Sometimes I feel like I'm the only one who doesn't mind AI art. In fact, I actually like it even. Sure, it has that samey look but I like that style. The only thing that I don't like are the often messed up fingers that you get with AI art. AI art is still perfectly "fappable" and that's all that matters to me to be honest.
 
3.80 star(s) 5 Votes