That isn't a contradiction? In fact with their characterisation that makes total sense.
Believe it or not, but that's... normal? Some people just want to have kids, and aren't interested in anyone who doesn't. Others think there's something wrong with you if you don't like them. But telling a kindergarten teacher you don't like the little shits seems like a surefire way to get on her bad side.
I predict 0 sex scenes with Jamie. Well 0 sex scenes with the MC, to be clear.
You're not baiting me into "liking" that post.
yeah totally, I can see the BBC gangbang incoming
I know you're upset but I wanted to ask you if you would consider removing your spoiler comment
I know pressing skip with one hand can be taxing while holding something else in the other hand, but anyone who actually cares to READ the dialogues would understand:
Why does conflict need to arise before anything can happen?
Honestly, that's like saying Jamie and Rockford should've simply fucked their repressed desires out of each other during their first office meet early in Ch 1. But that's not how good story-telling works, and neither are your suggestions considering the AVN is only at the halfway stage. If the two were already in a relationship, then the choice would simply be does Rockford move across the country to be with Jamie? Where's the drama and tension in that? Also, Jamie's sudden decision plays directly into the story arc surrounding the MC's abandonment issues. Regarding your point 6, that's EXACTLY what Rockford did in that scene.Why does conflict need to arise before anything can happen?
There are other options/paths too:
1. Jamie could've chosen love, especially after the basically confession by mc.
2. Jamie could've chosen love, and her career. One does not exclude the other, it makes it more difficult for sure. But not impossible.
3. Rockford could've chosen love, especially after the request to run for office. He could've revealed this to her, instead of immediately going with the playing it off as 'love for my sister'. Granted that could have an entirely different meaning with the other reveal
4. They could've actually talked, trying to work it out in a meaningful way. Instead of dodging the issue.
5. Jamie went full Rockford with her reaction, which is really hypocritical after the amount of justified shit she gave him for it.
6. They could've talked and decided to not pursue each other romantically. Due to their 'careers' or put it on hold.
7. Jamie's brother and Rockford could've absconded. Leaving them all behind.
I appreciate the story here but I just wanna say that there are some multi-season series that I wish ended with the first episode.I hope you don't write for TV. A potential multi-season series would be concluded after the first episode.
True! No one should expect LeavingDNA to ever approach the "jumping the shark" stage, though.I appreciate the story here but I just wanna say that there are some multi-season series that I wish ended with the first episode.
Boehser Onkel That post was deleted before I had a chance to study it. Did you change your mind about the code?
That's from earlier in the episode at the bar I believe, not the cliff-hanger ending. It did end up having a double meaning though huh?
