Because it is all the same question. How do you define actualy happens/exists?
So you mean that everything actualy happend in the game is "real"? Isn't it same as "what you see on-screen is real"? I told you, it is a useful one.
It is
not simple. Actualy, you haven't constructed a definition which would say that Sensei actualy exists yet.
Also, definitions of reality IRL are complex AF and require lots of ad-hoc axioms to the point when question "is something real" looses both its meaning and possibility of answer, so it would be strange if it would became simple when applied to denpa fiction.
The realy simple way is to use stupid definition and correct it from time to time
I am not focusing. I am suggesting the only thing I find reasonable.
You know, there is no reason to discuss reality of something at all. Theory might be true despite it's hypotesis might be not real and vice versa, because theory is true when it predicts the future (i.e. what we would
see), but not when it says what is real and what is not.
But if you are going to discuss reality, you should be able to explain what do you mean by "real", because otherwise the simple answer is "nope, this is fuction, it is obviously not real". You can mean by "real" litterally everything, from "It is real if it could be IRL" to "It is real because it was said by narrator" and I can mean by "real" exact opposite thing so there is basicaly notthing to discuss unless you state what did you actualy mean by "real"
Last part is always the worst
![Frown :( :(]()
Good news no discussion would survive 0.36
Is that penis
realy big or it is just Sensei's dellusion?