- Jun 28, 2019
- 163
- 928
For one thing, it's what Pareidolia and Sekai are directly telling us to do and I doubt that anything they want is actually in the best interests of Sensei or the girls. But it's not impossible that they're saying the correct thing for the wrong reasons, and your interpretation could be valid.How do we know that breaking the girls, isn't the right thing?
Or I guess from a "play" perspective, in order to see the good endings, we have to break them right? They (we) don't get to experience the good until we push through and take part in the bad.
As we are all playing an "h-game" we should be wanting to break them (we read the tags) and as, we, the players start sympathizing with everybody more we root for Akira to not do the bad thing. We stop caring about wanting to fuck Maya, and now we all want to save Maya prime, for example.
I'm just not sure the text supports them being wrong yet, even if they feel bad.
Maybe, if Tsubasa is the second narrator, in order to save everybody you do have to turn yourself into a god (which in the modern context sounds bad, but was the whole point of a lot of ancient spiritual traditions).
This is all speculation built on speculation built on scanty evidence, but to me it seems like Maya Prime and the first narrator had a plan that didn't involve breaking anyone. Instead they were trying to fix Akira so that he could then somehow fix the world. That might also involve him becoming a god, but in a slower fashion with a lot less suffering. And the plan seemed to be working; Sensei is slowly getting his memories back and improving as a person. Albeit in large part due to the sinkhole bringing Noriko and Niki into his life, which Maya was opposed to. My reading is that, in addition to her selfish reasons, she was worried about things accelerating too quickly and breaking him again. She has a lot of trial and error experience with what breaks Sensei, and apparently the Nakayamas are able to do things that she couldn't.
As for the second narrator, if my interpretation is correct, she doesn't actually want to fix the world. If the world is fixed, the gods dissappear and Akira loses whatever powers he is able to gain. Instead she wants to take control of the world as a kind of benevolent ruler while still allowing the cycles to continue.
I do think this is all moot from a narrative perspective; whether or not the first plan would have worked, it's not the path that things are going to go down any longer. So in that sense it will be necessary for us to see the girls get broken in order to get to the good endings on the other side. It's just possible that there was a better alternative that we won't get to see. And I think that's in line with Sel's narrative strategy; we need to feel that there was a more moral alternative in order for the dark route to have its full impact.
Again, though, these are just my personal ideas and I could be completely wrong about everything.