- Sep 5, 2020
- 2,826
- 6,051
If Chika facilitates this, we can elevate her to godhood.
- Aug 20, 2022
- 202
- 1,198
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
In any case, it won't happen this year at least anyway.
I wonder if barglenarglezous will be right and there will be some interesting changes in dynamics within the different timelines, for example Yumi being with Akira, Rin with Chika, Tsuneyo with Takoyaki Son, Son of Takoyaki Man.
- Sep 5, 2020
- 2,826
- 6,051
I think you're attributing someone else's theory to me.
I don't think we're in different timelines. I think they're witnessing a memory of past parties within the reset itself, and they need to navigate to the school rooftop to finish the journey.
Because of this, they might witness things they didn't during the actual party -- for example, Maya might walk in on Akira and Molly, but they're not actually travelling through time. This is all just reset fuckery.
- Jun 28, 2019
- 233
- 1,639
You know what door she's standing right outside.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Well that's blindingly obvious in retrospect.
Even if we ignore the Noriko thing, the timeline doesn't work. In "Kyoto" Niki says that Akira has been turning down sex for over a year.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
But Niki and Akira only dated for five years before the accident.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Also, check out Akira's shadow here. That's his adult hair, though maybe it's supposed to be an older teen model that we haven't seen yet.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Sekai is literally driving past the Windows XP wallpaper
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
So this could all be a Selebus slip-up, but until he acknowledges it or fixes it in a future update I'm going to assume that it's intentional. Here are the possible explanations I see:
- It's a second pregnancy. I agree this one is unlikely because Sekai would have brought Ami or at least explained why she wasn't there.
- "Kyoto" is fake or from an alternate timeline. I think I lean toward this one because of the other weird stuff.
- Akira's history with the Nakayamas is fake.
- Ami is fake.
Niki was born in March 1991 (she's 29) and Ami was born in August 2005 (she was seven when the accident happened). Niki would have been 13 when Ami was conceived and 14 when she was born.
- Nov 23, 2023
- 819
- 1,602
I don't think anyone has talked about it yet, and if they have, I apologize for not having seen it, but anyway, Akira is currently in the timeline of the first Halloween where many bad things haven't happened yet, and he also has Maya Prime there in that moment in time, will he really want to return to the main timeline if he gets the chance?
Of the 4 people who traveled to the alternative/past timelines he is the only one who could have done well with it if he thinks about it because a lot of bad things didn't happen, so he has a high chance of wanting to stay there.
Of the 4 people who traveled to the alternative/past timelines he is the only one who could have done well with it if he thinks about it because a lot of bad things didn't happen, so he has a high chance of wanting to stay there.
- Aug 20, 2022
- 202
- 1,198
You're right, I misread one of your previous posts, apologies.
I am not yet convinced though that those are merely memories. And I also don't necessarily think they are time traveling per se. Just slipping to different planes.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited:
- May 27, 2020
- 1,305
- 9,567
Something I should mention is Sel is purposely naming the "0.45" spoilers "0.44 ." Whether he is treating 0.45 as 0.44 Part 2 is beyond me. But its interesting nonetheless.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Sorry for the word salad that become more incoherent as I went on, my head hurts too much and I can't really make sense of what happened and what is going to happen.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Aug 23, 2023
- 1,821
- 8,912
at the end of infinity house, this appears:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Would it be too absurd for them to still be in the reset? More importantly, why does it become dangerous to save beyond so early in the build? Before everything of note happens? Now, on both my posts about the update I totally ignored this, but given the Selebus evidence maybe it really means something?
Edit: btw this is hidden on replay because what a great artistic vision, Selebus.
Last edited:
- Sep 5, 2020
- 2,826
- 6,051
I can't put any real stock in the timeline being wholly different because people were standing in different spots or Ayane told a joke she didn't tell in the original scene. People move around at parties, and there are moments during the party where we don't see what's going on in the main room -- and there are multiple conversations happening at the same time iwthin that room and we're only being shown the relevant ones. We aren't shown every waking moment of Sensei's day, either, so just because we didn't see Ayane rehearsing her routine doesn't mean it didn't happen, and it doesn't even mean Akira wasn't present for it.
Further -- we've gotten no real confirmation that the reset has ended. Which means it is most likely that none of this is real.
- Aug 23, 2023
- 1,821
- 8,912
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
If I catch Nao-chan alone it won't be so wholesome consensual anymore
- Apr 22, 2020
- 12
- 31
I think all the timeline if messed up with the Nakayama sisters
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Pdst: Hi, first time commenting here sorry for my bad english
Last edited:
- Apr 24, 2021
- 1,074
- 4,413
OK, I've made a timeline draft due to the recent mass confusion regarding Noriko's presence in Kyoto.
Some disclaimers are:
1. This timeline is constructed under the assumption that there is no time fuckery or developer oversight or any other shenanigan. I.e., assuming everything shown is from a linear timeline and Selly did not fuck up at all.
(not that I don't think it's impossible. It's just those two possibilities are the absolute trump cards that overrule literally every argument without needing much reasoning. If there is a way to fit things into one flawless linear path then it'd be my go-to until it can no longer be done)
2. I try using ONLY "what's written in the textbox" as the sole determinant, avoiding judging ages based off character models (unless a vastly different model is used), or using conjectures from the conversation no matter how logical they might be.
As in, ONLY using "what is stated here".
3. Following up, "what is stated here" is regarded as absolutely factual without considering the chances of the characters lying unless it is VERY overt.
(this is to avoid rabbit holes like "your evidences are lying while mine are not!")
4. Other events not within the window between Noriko's birth year and the year of The Accident are omitted, with the exception of Present that serves as a reference point.
For me, the confusion that I got is probably due to the fact that there exist only two character models in the game, and the teen version only represents "time during the past" as a broad stroke and will not reflect on "when exactly". For example, if you are willing to believe this timeline draft, that means Niki was in her 20 during Kyoto and she looked almost identical to the Niki when she was 14.
In addition, if one depends too much on character models to place a scene on the timeline, the following scene will make absolutely no sense whether you agree with this timeline or not.
Again the purpose is not meant for defending Selly. This is to, if it's at all possible, fit everything together in the simplest way. Let me know if I screw up somewhere.
Some disclaimers are:
1. This timeline is constructed under the assumption that there is no time fuckery or developer oversight or any other shenanigan. I.e., assuming everything shown is from a linear timeline and Selly did not fuck up at all.
(not that I don't think it's impossible. It's just those two possibilities are the absolute trump cards that overrule literally every argument without needing much reasoning. If there is a way to fit things into one flawless linear path then it'd be my go-to until it can no longer be done)
2. I try using ONLY "what's written in the textbox" as the sole determinant, avoiding judging ages based off character models (unless a vastly different model is used), or using conjectures from the conversation no matter how logical they might be.
As in, ONLY using "what is stated here".
3. Following up, "what is stated here" is regarded as absolutely factual without considering the chances of the characters lying unless it is VERY overt.
(this is to avoid rabbit holes like "your evidences are lying while mine are not!")
4. Other events not within the window between Noriko's birth year and the year of The Accident are omitted, with the exception of Present that serves as a reference point.
For me, the confusion that I got is probably due to the fact that there exist only two character models in the game, and the teen version only represents "time during the past" as a broad stroke and will not reflect on "when exactly". For example, if you are willing to believe this timeline draft, that means Niki was in her 20 during Kyoto and she looked almost identical to the Niki when she was 14.
In addition, if one depends too much on character models to place a scene on the timeline, the following scene will make absolutely no sense whether you agree with this timeline or not.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Again the purpose is not meant for defending Selly. This is to, if it's at all possible, fit everything together in the simplest way. Let me know if I screw up somewhere.
- Aug 23, 2023
- 1,821
- 8,912
Welcome. And yes, it's an interesting theory.
Mind you, Noriko is responsible, alonside Wires, for recovering Akira's first memory. There is a shot of her being under the influence of the moon while walking through the city alone (although it could just be for artistic sake). And she does mention alternate timelines.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Apr 22, 2020
- 12
- 31
Okey so here i suppouse the date of "Noriko old enough to sit in lap" is the date of the "Spotless mind"(i think is the event name) Edit:It is, i didn't see it in the time line lol
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited:
- Aug 23, 2023
- 1,821
- 8,912
I mean, this works, but only if you forego Kyoto. Here are the problems:
1. If Kyoto exists, then Ami must not have been born in its timeline. It's completely absurd that Akira or Sekai would conduct Kyoto the way they do if Ami is 6 years old, and it's Sekai's second pregnancy. Sekai loved Ami more than Akira. Or even that Ami'd think Nozomu was normal when he beat Sekai so much that she'd run away.
2. Also, if Kyoto exists then it can't have been in 2011 because Akira and Niki were not dating in Kyoto. Rather, Kyoto has to take place before they start dating. And the countdown of 5 years dating has to take place after it.
It had already been said, but this is very helpful in getting a clear picture of simply why Kyoto can't have existed in our timeline. By all means it should be in 2005, which makes everything else out of place (Noriko would be -1 during Kyoto, and at least -2 on Spotless Mind). Kyoto is in 2005 (assuming the pregnancy is Ami's, which it has to be - if it is in our timeline), Spotless Mind is even before it.
Edit: I don't understand why Kyoto has to take place within a year of the accident either. Is it because Sekai's supposed second child would have died in the accident?
Last edited:
- Aug 20, 2021
- 784
- 4,317
Well done, Kitty Hawk, for flipping the entire Lessons in Love F95 forum on its head with your astute observation.
Now none of us know what to believe anymore!
Now none of us know what to believe anymore!
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
- Aug 23, 2023
- 1,821
- 8,912
Kitty Hawk has perfected their game, and now doesn't even need a futanari horse cock to fuck with our minds.Well done, Kitty Hawk, for flipping the entire Lessons in Love F95 forum on its head with your astute observation.
Now none of us know what to believe anymore!
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
- Sep 5, 2020
- 2,826
- 6,051
Additionally, Sekai's line about how much Akira's starting look like a man instead of a boy implies that he's still in puberty, not 22 years old.