- Jul 12, 2019
- 54
- 74
Java Lilith's Throne [v0.4.9.9] [Innoxia]
- Thread starter Waaifu
- Start date
-
- Tags
- adventure anal sex character creation corruption fantasy female protagonist footjob furry futa/trans futa/trans protagonist gay group sex handjob lesbian male protagonist monster girl oral sex pregnancy prostitution rpg spanking text based titfuck transformation trap turn based combat vaginal sex
Hey guys, does anybody know if there are some mods on the current build, like mods for age limit, or maybe a mod to kill people in encounters? Tried to search for some of it and the most of the links are just dead, 8chan kidpussy edition from github doesn't appear to work either (or maybe i'm doing it wrong)
there are in discord (well mods any way) but as for the content the modders are willing to add i would not call it a true modding comunity as they will not add anything that dev would not put in the game so killing people is a no go in less you right the mod your self (i for one when the game comes out plan to make a mod that give more grim dark fantsy to this game along with some more rp macanics and fetishes i will spoiler content not yet in the game if i say all that i want to add so ill leave it there)
- Aug 25, 2017
- 1,731
- 3,817
The fuck?
If that is what it sounds like then this forum is definitely not the place to discuss it.
Nvmind, figured it out. For anyone who want's actual guns for their character, all you have to do is go into the exe game files, then into the "res" folder, then the "weapons" one, then "Innoxia", and then "gun". Once there, click on the XML document of the gun you want, which you can open in notepad if you have windows, and delete this line of code: <tag>CHEAT_ITEM</tag>. Save the changes, and if your game is open, close it out and then re-open it. Enter the "buggy" menu, go to weapons, and the new gun should be there.
- Sep 8, 2020
- 2
- 0
Is there a mod for portal panties, that would be so awesome. Leaving them at the brothel so people can use you even when your out and you sporadically drop in to collect your ernings.
- Apr 29, 2018
- 1,167
- 1,285
They're the stereotypical back-wing variety.
(And if you're ever bored, look up actual oldschool angels...)
- May 25, 2018
- 30
- 88
Cool, I like my angels to look like Wheels with a lot of eyes and more wings than a small airport.
Or do you just ignore the trippy Ezekiel stuff?
Or do you just ignore the trippy Ezekiel stuff?
that is not the bibbical bible in less its some messed up version of it the bibbical angels are humen in form with massive wings on there backs and a halo over there head othere then the wings and halo they are human in apreance anything elts is taking the angel mithoes to its own world at which point they are no longer bibical angels so the ones you like are not bibbical but if they are implamented in the fucher and are capcherable then transformations will make them to your likingCool, I like my angels to look like Wheels with a lot of eyes and more wings than a small airport.
Or do you just ignore the trippy Ezekiel stuff?
- Feb 20, 2019
- 215
- 221
A "Biblically accurate" angel would make a really good boss fight imo
They also should say "BE NOT AFRAID"
They also should say "BE NOT AFRAID"
Honestly, at best that's maybe half of a Dark Souls boss fight. It might beat Pinwheel or the Dragon Riders if you can find the rest of it.
Yeah, not enough wheels and faces:
You must be registered to see the links
Also,
You must be registered to see the links
At least the OG text had some creativity to it before the franchise went mass market. John got some high tripping in with Revelations stuff, but the rest... meh.
no more like too meny wings for one and two its an owl and Biblically accurate angels are humen with wings and 1 halo (asuming ur calling halos wheels)
Every one had four faces apiece, and every one four wings; and the likeness of the hands of a man was under their wings.
this is a chairabim not an angel and they guard eden
this is a chairabim not an angel and they guard eden
You're arguing with literal text of the Bible "not being Biblically accurate."
Kek.
Why are you even bothering to argue with a claim that is instantly verifiable as false?
You must be registered to see the links