I understand, but don't get frustrated, I've learned to accept that a moderator will always be right, no matter how much you argue. In fact, Fried responded to this when I told him that there were people who only knew how to debate a discussion by reporting posts they didn't like / didn't know how to refute.
Hello chopolander,
Thanks for your correction.
Badgering the Dev and going overboard on milking, perceived bad intentions, etc. about the effort is entirely off-topic per
our rules. Game threads are for discussion of the game content and related points - while some side-conversation about Dev activity is reasonable and relevant, what is happening in that thread could see pages of repetitive accusations and whinings wiped clear, with absolutely nothing of value missed. Meanwhile, anyone who desires to discuss the actual game, its history or plans has little air left in the room with which to get a fair response.
Hope that helps.
- fried
It was when the 3D version, which in the end turned out not to be as good as they said it was, the funny thing is that those people who bragged about it have not apologised to this day to those of us who supposedly weren't right about it. Well, I'm sure some of them don't even appear out of shame.
So don't worry, I will continue to say what I like and what I don't like. If that helps, fine, if it doesn't, then nothing. They never liked me for saying things clearly according to their conformations and actions, time has proved me right in some of them.