- Apr 25, 2022
- 1,965
- 6,723
Please quote my full sentence as the context can be understood by full context. Highlighted full sentence separately so that you can understand what I was talking about:
NTR is referred to Netorare, netorase and netori collectively and also individually too and I used it collectively including 3 of them. That Antagonist will be teacher in this case IF
I than mentioned that (se highlighted)
- Auntie is involved with MMC of lust of pain
- and dev includes Maeve in Lesson of loyalty as teacher's li's OR Dev involves teacher with Maeve when Maeve is already involved with MMC of lust of pain.
Why did I mentioned that? bcz it will make their(MMC, Maeve and Teacher) relationship more complex whether that is casual or romantic. Why bring characters from your other games and make it more than cameos just to make story more complicating and confusing for audience and why not keep it simple. That's why I than mentioned the solution.
What is it, that I said that was complex in my whole conversation?
Dude, I understand exactly what you are saying and I'm telling you that you are critically misunderstanding the trope. Merely "being involved" is a gross misinterpretation commonly deployed by the anti-NTR brigade. The characters have to be romantically involved with the MC. As of now, Maeve is not romantically involved with either MC and neither of the MCs are rivals. That fundamentally rules out all three categories. All three categories require some form of cheating or cuckolding. Netorare and Netori require an antagonistic relationship between rivals and Netorase is a willing cuck protag with either a willing or unwilling partner.
*sigh* this is devolving into another NTR debate so I'm not going further with this. I would recommend actually educating yourself on NTR (any of the three subcategories) before you start branding VNs with it.
My point still stands. Maeve could fuck both MCs in certain contexts and cheating/cucking/sharing/NTR could be left out of the equation.
Last edited: