- Thread starter Pepé Le Pew
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg anal sex animated bdsm big ass big tits cheating corruption cosplay creampie dating sim exhibitionism female domination footjob groping group sex handjob humiliation lesbian male domination male protagonist masturbation milf oral sex point & click romance sandbox sex toys spanking teasing titfuck vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
Oh boy I so wish it wasn't in RPGM, I cannot fucking stand playing another RPGM game but I really want to play Icstors previous ones :/
- Aug 7, 2016
- 1,918
- 2,613
Milf's Control actually has gameplay, so I really didnt mind that one and I would argue its actually one of the better one of his.
However, Milf's Villa I couldnt force myself to play it. I cant stand walking simulators with scenes so far apart in RPGM.
Mostly because the % is completely meaningless.
I'll check Milf's Control out, although I mostly play his games for the amazing scenes/renders and milf's villa have them while milf's conrol looks...eh
- Dec 11, 2017
- 15
- 26
I can't wait for action with the therapist. After Caroline, she is the best asset of the game, milfly speaking 
- May 26, 2018
- 22
- 22
- Sep 22, 2017
- 124
- 391
Whatever the testing period is he should include it in the 100% and not deceive newcomers. The dev can take all the time needed but why have the deceiving progress bar.
If 0.3 is Sara>Relationship lvl 3, and 0.2 was Linda and Caroline > lvl 3, then at minimum 0.4 should bring Celia to level 3 as well. And at some point these other teased characters need to be developed--Lily, Judy, the Aunt, the neighbors, Violet, the girl at the swimming pool, the one other girl in school. From a player standpoint, going forward, I'd prefer that all 4 of the main romantic NPCs--Linda, Caroline, Sara and Celia--be developed to the same level per upgrade, so 0.5 would bring them to level 4 and 0.6 would bring them to level 5. If there's a 0.7 that should be the "complete" version, perhaps with bonus content. IMHO, YMMV, etc.
- Apr 27, 2017
- 1,925
- 3,892
It's not deceiving, it's common sense that testing isn't part of the progress bar. When a version reaches 100%, the game is done. The content has been fully implemented and the code is ready.
You'll obviously need some play-testing with it though to check for bugs, but since nothing will be added during those tests, it is correct to remain at 100%. Think of it as a content bar and not a release schedule.
- May 24, 2017
- 149
- 128
That makes no sense at all. If the game is done then the next step is release. Having to test for bugs means that the coding process has not been completed lmao
- Apr 27, 2017
- 1,925
- 3,892
As per definition a bug is defined as a part of the code which results in an error and thus malfunctioning of the game.
Noticed how I said part of the code? This directly implies that said part is already implemented. It may or may work due to missing commands, some syntax errors or a mere typo from the dev but it's there, it's already written.
So ... a game can be done, i.e. CGIs all rendered + code fully written and thus reaching 100% on the progress bar you don't seem to understand and still not be functioning properly. Even to such an extent that it would be wise to play-test it which ICSTOR does for instance.
As said above, testing is part of the release schedule but not part of the progress bar, as it does not add anything new to the game.
if you check the dev's website (link in OP) its showing as 90%, so hopefully in a week or so.
- Sep 23, 2017
- 38
- 31