Brannon

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
1,202
1,607
we don't know at the moment :rolleyes:
Correct.
We do know Dragomira is a woman, we know she is a vampire and we know she is a teacher.

The dev did reveal that there are LIs in the game, but neither who they are nor what they bring to the table.
A few are relatively obvious (but not confirmed) like Rachel and Nina.
Others are a total mystery if they are LI or Sidechick like Grace or Maxine.
With some we don't even know whether sex is in the cards, like Dragomira, Olga, Sharpe or Essentia.
Likely yes but no confirmation whatsoever and the dev is not even budging claiming he wants to avoid spoiling the story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: H2R

H2R

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2020
1,231
364
Correct.
We do know Dragomira is a woman, we know she is a vampire and we know she is a teacher.

The dev did reveal that there are LIs in the game, but neither who they are nor what they bring to the table.
A few are relatively obvious (but not confirmed) like Rachel and Nina.
Others are a total mystery if they are LI or Sidechick like Grace or Maxine.
With some we don't even know whether sex is in the cards, like Dragomira, Olga, Sharpe or Essentia.
Likely yes but no confirmation whatsoever and the dev is not even budging claiming he wants to avoid spoiling the story.
I'm sad that it's not confirmed yet, makes me nervous about her being untouchable for the entire game
 

Brannon

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
1,202
1,607
I think that any woman that the MC can score relationship points with is a potential LI. Am I wrong?
Sadly yes you are.

Reason:
It is established through other games that you gain "relationship points" with side chicks as well.
Meaning those points don't mean shit for the determination about who is (Main) LI and who is not.
Just what character had the most possible interactions set by the dev up until that point.
Whether a character is on that list or not does not mean shit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: H2R

Jack Townsend

Active Member
Sep 4, 2020
557
507
Sadly yes you are.

Reason:
It is established through other games that you gain "relationship points" with side chicks as well.
Meaning those points don't mean shit for the determination about who is (Main) LI and who is not.
Just what character had the most possible interactions set by the dev up until that point.
Whether a character is on that list or not does not mean shit.
That would suck. Why bother having a relationship points system, if you can't even have real relationships with them. It kinda contradicts and defeats the whole purpose of it.
 

Brannon

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
1,202
1,607
That would suck. Why bother having a relationship points system, if you can't even have real relationships with them. It kinda contradicts and defeats the whole purpose of it.
Yes and No.

The relationship points are a ...well ... basic point system.
You unlock "better" events later if you have a certain amounts of points.
If you don't you don't. Simple as that.

Whether those better events are sexual or not is a completely different issue.
For instance you could get relationship points with Sharpe but never even see her tits as her "better" events are centered on the stone and/or an underlining conspiracy.

In an AVN better events mostly are sexual events, but that is not guaranteed and the dev refuses to elaborate.


All in all:
Just because a girl has "relationship points" it does not automatically mean she is an LI.
 

Samuel Hidayat

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2019
1,837
2,438
That would suck. Why bother having a relationship points system, if you can't even have real relationships with them. It kinda contradicts and defeats the whole purpose of it.
Relationship =/= being a couple or intimate. Being friends or mere acquaintance are also forms of relationship.
 

Jack Townsend

Active Member
Sep 4, 2020
557
507
Relationship =/= being a couple or intimate. Being friends or mere acquaintance are also forms of relationship.
That's true. But I don't think people play these games looking for friends or mere acquaintances. The developers of these sort of games know (or should know) what the players are looking for in their "relationships." :sneaky:
 

Brannon

Well-Known Member
Nov 2, 2017
1,202
1,607
You have very bad education. The meaning of "love" came into Europe in the period of Romanticism, in 19th century. Before this there wasn't the meaning of such thing as love. Romeo & Juliet, two teenagers, before this, thought in very different way. It's just our interpretation ourdays, that they "loved" each other in romantic way.
Wrong.
Love is a human emotion.
It is sparked by chemical reactions in the human brain.

Before romanticism that emotion was present, just not commonly used "love" as a name for it.


Can't decide of whether you are a troll or a stupid troll.
 

Jack Townsend

Active Member
Sep 4, 2020
557
507
You have very bad education. The meaning of "love" came into Europe in the period of Romanticism, in 19th century. Before this there wasn't the meaning of such thing as love. Romeo & Juliet, two teenagers, before this, thought in very different way. It's just our interpretation ourdays, that they "loved" each other in romantic way.
Actually, the concept of love dates back to ancient BC times. The ancient Greeks, for example, divided it into several categories: Agape, which translates to "love of the soul." Eros, which translates to "love of the body." Philia, which translates to "love of the mind." They even had concepts such as Storge, which describes the love of parents for their children, and Xenia, which is the love of hosts for their guests.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: lepinetraunkaspars
4.50 star(s) 77 Votes