The writing in the encyclopedia is hyperbole most of the time.
That obviously applies to the writing and the scenarios in this game too. If both are hyperbolic, they are not hyperbolic in relation to each other.
Incubi's bodies and minds are designed for pleasure, especially with their wives. Incubi are somehow more sensitive to pleasure with their wives, yet have no problems keeping up with them.
i've never really had the opportunity to ask anyone in the community this kinda thing, but how does KC get away with putting stuff like this in the MGE books? they're fairly well-known books being published for profit, and the balrog is just a creature from LotR. it's not the first monster girl like this by any means, so are they just flying under the radar or what? i can't imagine they're getting the copyright holders to sign off on it.
What other monsters are copyrighted? I was under the assumption that the vast majority of KC's monster girls are based off public domain monster concepts.
He includes it cause it's his fetish but he wants people of all sexual proclivities to enjoy his works so he makes the setting super flexible. That means though that it's not defined so nothing's consistent.
The same reason Lego can get away with making Lego versions of popular IP.
lego does get permission from those big IPs. i guess it's not exactly the same and it's too small to be worth the effort of suing.
Really?
He'll need to be made aware it's a problem first, which he might not know. KC also ignores all messages sent to him in english so... it might be difficult to make him aware.
Bear in mind, intellectual property law is a complex field, but it generally centers around recognizable archetype/characters, and their uniqueness. The dev would likely run afoul of DC's legal department if he tried to make a "Superman" or "Batman" monster girl, even if they looked nothing like the DC characters, but common monster names like "werewolf" or "mummy" or even "kaiju" are fair game. I doubt anyone "owns" Krampus or the Boogeyman, although some dips**ts might try to make those claims (based on movies with these characters in them, for example), and most of Kenkou's monster girls are general types (succubi, imps, nekomata, etc). He should be fine as long as he watches out for specific names / images.
Ha ha, yeah, I remember that s**t. Tolkein's people somehow thought he owned all mythological creatures. But hobbit at least WAS a name he invented, and therefore they had a good argument on that one.
That's great to hear, fuck Wizards of the Coast.
Sadly, this was long before Hasbro / WotC, 'cuz yeah, screw them. As for an IP owner suing... well, some of them are notorious for that. But again, probably not an issue for Kenkou unless he wants to delve into things that ARE owned (I heard someone say "balrog" earlier, that would be a mistake).
