Your views are based on your bias. There's no evidence to support your supposition, you simply claim it is so because you're absolutely sure you are the chosen one, capeable of seeing reality. That's common among ignorant people. They don't know anything, so they're really happy for any simplistic principle they can convince themselves is real. It makes the world easier to understand, less chaotic and scary. Though ultimately they're just kings of an anthill, proclaiming themselves conquerers of the greatest mountain because nothing around looks as great as theirs. It's the trick of distance. Things seem smaller the farther they are away, and so the great mountains of wisdom, small specks on the horizon, seem like insignificant things to the ignorant.
You're shaking your head. You're angry. Let me show you:
You make the distinction between men and women and who they are, and how to evaluate sexual promiscuity based on their sex (while ignoring how Genghis Khan was also a genocidal asshole, because that doesn't really factor into it, does it?), because you suggest you're understanding what you're talking about. You don't.
1. Why is there a difference between how men and women should be seen?
2. What are the biological reasons for that difference that are "founded in nature"?
3. You say it's important to preserve your "line", why?
4. Do women have a family line that needs to be preserved? If no, why?
5. Are there any possibilities for success beyond the narrow frame you've dictated?
6. How do we evaluate all the instances where people feel successful, are considered successful, but haven't lived life the way you're saying?
7. If we can determine that, via vote of majority consent, that a person is considered successful by most, but does not match with your standard of success, who is wrong? Everyone else? Or just you?
And for every answer you can give, I can ask a follow up question. And with every answer and every scenario I create, you'll look more and more silly.
There are great philosophers, thinkers, inventors, who didn't have children but whose heritage is etched into the very fabric of our reality.
And your evaluate of that is: They were losers, they should have impregnated more women. A spade is a spade, and only that would have made them successful in life!